数码科技系统应用于文物保育来自约旦的启示

Q1 Arts and Humanities
C. Trillo, Rania Aburamadan, Shatha Mubaideen, Dana Salameen, Busisiwe Chikomborero Ncube Makore
{"title":"数码科技系统应用于文物保育来自约旦的启示","authors":"C. Trillo, Rania Aburamadan, Shatha Mubaideen, Dana Salameen, Busisiwe Chikomborero Ncube Makore","doi":"10.1515/pdtc-2020-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Consensus exists on the importance of heritage for ensuring sustainable futures, due to its impact on political aspects, ethical reflection and local economic development. Nowadays, using technology has become crucial in the construction industry, including heritage conservation. This paper aims to compare a selected sample of digital platforms, gathering data in support of heritage documentation, both for heritage and archeological sites. Despite the huge potential of digital technologies for contributing to heritage conservation, still there is a need for more clarity on what should be used to achieve different goals and what is the best approach under various circumstances. A team of five experts on digital technologies applied to different types of heritage worked collaboratively to gather the case studies in this paper and to analyse them comparatively. Jordan is a Middle East and North Africa country chosen as unit of analysis, because of the huge potential of digital technologies for heritage documentation. The findings from the comparative case review offers a reflection on what should best adopted for achieving different goals. Differences of approaches were revealed between the characteristics of heritage site and those of archaeological sites in Jordan’s conservation history. The findings called for a prioritization of using digital technology in both heritage and archeological sites. The discussion on digital platforms currently available in Jordan allows for highlighting strengths and limitations of different approaches and methodologies, thus drawing lessons for addressing the strategic choice of the most appropriate digital solution under different circumstances and in different contexts.","PeriodicalId":38353,"journal":{"name":"Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture","volume":"61 1","pages":"121 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a Systematic Approach to Digital Technologies for Heritage Conservation. Insights from Jordan\",\"authors\":\"C. Trillo, Rania Aburamadan, Shatha Mubaideen, Dana Salameen, Busisiwe Chikomborero Ncube Makore\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/pdtc-2020-0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Consensus exists on the importance of heritage for ensuring sustainable futures, due to its impact on political aspects, ethical reflection and local economic development. Nowadays, using technology has become crucial in the construction industry, including heritage conservation. This paper aims to compare a selected sample of digital platforms, gathering data in support of heritage documentation, both for heritage and archeological sites. Despite the huge potential of digital technologies for contributing to heritage conservation, still there is a need for more clarity on what should be used to achieve different goals and what is the best approach under various circumstances. A team of five experts on digital technologies applied to different types of heritage worked collaboratively to gather the case studies in this paper and to analyse them comparatively. Jordan is a Middle East and North Africa country chosen as unit of analysis, because of the huge potential of digital technologies for heritage documentation. The findings from the comparative case review offers a reflection on what should best adopted for achieving different goals. Differences of approaches were revealed between the characteristics of heritage site and those of archaeological sites in Jordan’s conservation history. The findings called for a prioritization of using digital technology in both heritage and archeological sites. The discussion on digital platforms currently available in Jordan allows for highlighting strengths and limitations of different approaches and methodologies, thus drawing lessons for addressing the strategic choice of the most appropriate digital solution under different circumstances and in different contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2020-0023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2020-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

由于遗产对政治方面、伦理反思和当地经济发展的影响,遗产对于确保可持续未来的重要性已经达成共识。如今,在建筑行业,包括遗产保护中,使用技术已经变得至关重要。本文旨在比较选定的数字平台样本,收集数据以支持遗产和考古遗址的遗产文献。虽然数码科技在文物保育方面有巨大的潜力,但我们仍需要更清楚地了解,在不同的情况下,应使用什么技术来达到不同的目标,以及什么是最佳的方法。一个由五位研究数字技术应用于不同类型遗产的专家组成的小组,共同收集了本文中的案例研究,并对其进行了比较分析。约旦是一个中东和北非国家,被选为分析单位,因为数字技术在遗产记录方面具有巨大潜力。比较案例审查的结果提供了对实现不同目标应采取的最佳措施的反思。在约旦的保护历史中,遗产遗址的特征与考古遗址的特征在方法上存在差异。调查结果呼吁在遗产和考古遗址中优先使用数字技术。关于约旦现有数字平台的讨论可以突出不同方法和方法的优势和局限性,从而为在不同情况和不同背景下战略性地选择最适当的数字解决方案吸取经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Towards a Systematic Approach to Digital Technologies for Heritage Conservation. Insights from Jordan
Abstract Consensus exists on the importance of heritage for ensuring sustainable futures, due to its impact on political aspects, ethical reflection and local economic development. Nowadays, using technology has become crucial in the construction industry, including heritage conservation. This paper aims to compare a selected sample of digital platforms, gathering data in support of heritage documentation, both for heritage and archeological sites. Despite the huge potential of digital technologies for contributing to heritage conservation, still there is a need for more clarity on what should be used to achieve different goals and what is the best approach under various circumstances. A team of five experts on digital technologies applied to different types of heritage worked collaboratively to gather the case studies in this paper and to analyse them comparatively. Jordan is a Middle East and North Africa country chosen as unit of analysis, because of the huge potential of digital technologies for heritage documentation. The findings from the comparative case review offers a reflection on what should best adopted for achieving different goals. Differences of approaches were revealed between the characteristics of heritage site and those of archaeological sites in Jordan’s conservation history. The findings called for a prioritization of using digital technology in both heritage and archeological sites. The discussion on digital platforms currently available in Jordan allows for highlighting strengths and limitations of different approaches and methodologies, thus drawing lessons for addressing the strategic choice of the most appropriate digital solution under different circumstances and in different contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture
Preservation, Digital Technology and Culture Arts and Humanities-Conservation
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信