接受MitraClip的功能性MR患者的计算机断层扫描特征

G. Hashimoto, B. Lopes, M. Fukui, M. Sarano, S. Garcia, Mario Goessl, P. Sorajja, J. Lesser, J. Cavalcante
{"title":"接受MitraClip的功能性MR患者的计算机断层扫描特征","authors":"G. Hashimoto, B. Lopes, M. Fukui, M. Sarano, S. Garcia, Mario Goessl, P. Sorajja, J. Lesser, J. Cavalcante","doi":"10.1093/EHJCI/JEAA356.248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Type of funding sources: None.\n \n \n \n Percutaneous leaflet repair with the MitraClip device (Abbott Vascular, Menlo Park, CA) is safe and effective in patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Residual or recurrent MR may occur in up to 40% of patients and is associated with persistent symptoms and impaired survival. The anatomical characteristics associated with residual or recurrent MR after MitraClip are not well defined by computed tomography angiography (CTA) in FMR population.\n \n \n \n A retrospective analysis of patients with significant FMR, who underwent retrospective-gated CTA at Minneapolis Heart Institute between July 2015 to January 2020, identified those who underwent percutaneous leaflet repair with MitraClip. Anatomical and functional parameters were assessed by pre-procedure CTA and compared between those with and without residual (≥2) MR.\n \n \n \n   A total of 25 patients were included (median[Q1, Q3]; age, 80[75, 85]; 44% men) and classified into ventricular FMR (V-FMR, n = 12) and atrial FMR (A-FMR, n = 13) according to anatomical and functional characteristics by CTA. 50% of V-FMR and 38% of A-FMR had residual/worsening MR. Among V-FMR patients with residual/worsening MR, shorter coaptation length was observed (2.2[2, 2.3] mm vs. 3.5[3, 4], p = 0.006) (Figure). No differences in anatomical or functional characteristics were seen in A-FMR patients.\n \n \n \n Longer coaptation length in V-FMR is predictive of successful MitraClip procedure, whereas mitral annulus size and cardiac volumes are not.\n <Ventricular FMR> Total (N = 12) No residual/no worsening MR (N = 6) Residual/worsening MR (N = 6) P value Septal-lateral diameter, mm 31.9 (30.5, 37.9) 32.2 (30.1, 39.8) 31.9 (29.5, 35) 0.749 Annulus area, cm² 11.2 (10.4, 13.6) 11.3 (10.1, 14.6) 11.1 (9.6, 12.6) 0.631 Tenting area, cm² 1.6 (1.3, 2.1) 1.6 (1.2, 2.2) 1.7 (1.2, 2.3) 0.873 Tenting height, mm 8.5 (6.5, 9.7) 8.5 (6.6, 9.3) 8.3 (6.3, 10.1) 0.749 Coaptation length, mm 2.6 (2.1, 3.5) 3.5 (3.0, 4.0) 2.2 (2.0, 2.3) 0.006 <Atrial FMR> Total (N = 13) No residual/no worsening MR (N = 8) Residual/worsening MR (N = 5) P value Septal-lateral diameter, mm 32.3 (29.5, 39.0) 32.0 (29.2, 39.9) 34.3 (30.8, 39.02) 0.464 Annulus area, cm² 10.3 (9.2, 14.7) 10.2 (9.0, 14.6) 12.4 (9.4, 14.7) 0.661 Tenting area, cm² 1.2 (0.8, 1.8) 1.1 (0.7, 2.2) 1.3 (0.7, 1.8) 0.884 Tenting height, mm 5.5 (4.1, 6.9) 6.3 (4.1, 8.7) 4.6 (3.7, 5.8) 0.213 Coaptation length, mm 2.3 (1.5, 2.8) 2.5 (1.4, 3.5) 1.9 (1.5, 2.6) 0.464 Comparison of baseline CT parameters between no residual/ no worsening MR and residual/ worsening MR Abstract Figure.\n","PeriodicalId":11963,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Echocardiography","volume":"20 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computed tomography characteristics of patients with functional MR receiving MitraClip\",\"authors\":\"G. Hashimoto, B. Lopes, M. Fukui, M. Sarano, S. Garcia, Mario Goessl, P. Sorajja, J. Lesser, J. Cavalcante\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/EHJCI/JEAA356.248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Type of funding sources: None.\\n \\n \\n \\n Percutaneous leaflet repair with the MitraClip device (Abbott Vascular, Menlo Park, CA) is safe and effective in patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Residual or recurrent MR may occur in up to 40% of patients and is associated with persistent symptoms and impaired survival. The anatomical characteristics associated with residual or recurrent MR after MitraClip are not well defined by computed tomography angiography (CTA) in FMR population.\\n \\n \\n \\n A retrospective analysis of patients with significant FMR, who underwent retrospective-gated CTA at Minneapolis Heart Institute between July 2015 to January 2020, identified those who underwent percutaneous leaflet repair with MitraClip. Anatomical and functional parameters were assessed by pre-procedure CTA and compared between those with and without residual (≥2) MR.\\n \\n \\n \\n   A total of 25 patients were included (median[Q1, Q3]; age, 80[75, 85]; 44% men) and classified into ventricular FMR (V-FMR, n = 12) and atrial FMR (A-FMR, n = 13) according to anatomical and functional characteristics by CTA. 50% of V-FMR and 38% of A-FMR had residual/worsening MR. Among V-FMR patients with residual/worsening MR, shorter coaptation length was observed (2.2[2, 2.3] mm vs. 3.5[3, 4], p = 0.006) (Figure). No differences in anatomical or functional characteristics were seen in A-FMR patients.\\n \\n \\n \\n Longer coaptation length in V-FMR is predictive of successful MitraClip procedure, whereas mitral annulus size and cardiac volumes are not.\\n <Ventricular FMR> Total (N = 12) No residual/no worsening MR (N = 6) Residual/worsening MR (N = 6) P value Septal-lateral diameter, mm 31.9 (30.5, 37.9) 32.2 (30.1, 39.8) 31.9 (29.5, 35) 0.749 Annulus area, cm² 11.2 (10.4, 13.6) 11.3 (10.1, 14.6) 11.1 (9.6, 12.6) 0.631 Tenting area, cm² 1.6 (1.3, 2.1) 1.6 (1.2, 2.2) 1.7 (1.2, 2.3) 0.873 Tenting height, mm 8.5 (6.5, 9.7) 8.5 (6.6, 9.3) 8.3 (6.3, 10.1) 0.749 Coaptation length, mm 2.6 (2.1, 3.5) 3.5 (3.0, 4.0) 2.2 (2.0, 2.3) 0.006 <Atrial FMR> Total (N = 13) No residual/no worsening MR (N = 8) Residual/worsening MR (N = 5) P value Septal-lateral diameter, mm 32.3 (29.5, 39.0) 32.0 (29.2, 39.9) 34.3 (30.8, 39.02) 0.464 Annulus area, cm² 10.3 (9.2, 14.7) 10.2 (9.0, 14.6) 12.4 (9.4, 14.7) 0.661 Tenting area, cm² 1.2 (0.8, 1.8) 1.1 (0.7, 2.2) 1.3 (0.7, 1.8) 0.884 Tenting height, mm 5.5 (4.1, 6.9) 6.3 (4.1, 8.7) 4.6 (3.7, 5.8) 0.213 Coaptation length, mm 2.3 (1.5, 2.8) 2.5 (1.4, 3.5) 1.9 (1.5, 2.6) 0.464 Comparison of baseline CT parameters between no residual/ no worsening MR and residual/ worsening MR Abstract Figure.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Echocardiography\",\"volume\":\"20 1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Echocardiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/EHJCI/JEAA356.248\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Echocardiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/EHJCI/JEAA356.248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

资金来源类型:无。使用MitraClip装置(Abbott Vascular, Menlo Park, CA)进行经皮小叶修复对于严重功能性二尖瓣反流(FMR)患者是安全有效的。高达40%的患者可能出现残留或复发性MR,并伴有持续症状和生存期受损。在FMR人群中,MitraClip术后残留或复发性MR的解剖学特征不能通过计算机断层血管造影(CTA)很好地定义。对2015年7月至2020年1月在明尼阿波利斯心脏研究所接受回顾性门通CTA的显著FMR患者进行回顾性分析,确定了使用MitraClip进行经皮小叶修复的患者。通过术前CTA评估解剖和功能参数,并比较有和没有残余mr(≥2)的患者。共纳入25例患者(中位数[Q1, Q3];年龄:80岁[75,85];44%男性),并根据CTA解剖和功能特征分为心室FMR (V-FMR, n = 12)和心房FMR (A-FMR, n = 13)。50%的V-FMR患者和38%的A-FMR患者存在MR残留/恶化,在MR残留/恶化的V-FMR患者中,观察到更短的适应长度(2.2[2,2.3]mm vs. 3.5[3,4], p = 0.006)(图)。在A-FMR患者中没有发现解剖或功能特征的差异。V-FMR中较长的适应长度预示着MitraClip手术的成功,而二尖瓣环的大小和心脏容量则不是。总(N = 12)没有残余/不恶化(N = 6)残余先生/恶化先生(N = 6) P值Septal-lateral直径31.9 mm(30.5, 37.9) 32.2(30.1, 39.8) 31.9(29.5, 35) 0.749环区域,厘米²11.2(10.4,13.6)11.3(10.1,14.6)11.1(9.6,12.6)0.631隆起区,厘米²1.6(1.3,2.1)1.6(1.2,2.2)1.7(1.2,2.3)0.873隆起高度,8.5 mm(6.5, 9.7) 8.5(6.6, 9.3) 8.3(6.3, 10.1) 0.749接合长度2.6毫米(2.1,3.5)3.5 (3.0,4.0)2.2 (2.0,2.3) 0.006 (N = 13)总没有残余/不恶化(N = 8)残余先生/恶化先生(N = 5) P值Septal-lateral直径,32.3 mm(29.5, 39.0) 32.0(29.2, 39.9) 34.3(30.8, 39.02) 0.464环区域,厘米²10.3(9.2,14.7)10.2(9.0,14.6)12.4(9.4,14.7)0.661隆起区,厘米²1.2(0.8,1.8)1.1(0.7,2.2)1.3(0.7,1.8)0.884隆起高度,5.5 mm(4.1, 6.9) 6.3(4.1, 8.7) 4.6(3.7, 5.8) 0.213接合长度2.3毫米(1.5,2.8)2.5 (1.4,3.5)1.9 (1.5,2.6) 0.464无残留/无恶化MR与残留/恶化MR基线CT参数比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Computed tomography characteristics of patients with functional MR receiving MitraClip
Type of funding sources: None. Percutaneous leaflet repair with the MitraClip device (Abbott Vascular, Menlo Park, CA) is safe and effective in patients with severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). Residual or recurrent MR may occur in up to 40% of patients and is associated with persistent symptoms and impaired survival. The anatomical characteristics associated with residual or recurrent MR after MitraClip are not well defined by computed tomography angiography (CTA) in FMR population. A retrospective analysis of patients with significant FMR, who underwent retrospective-gated CTA at Minneapolis Heart Institute between July 2015 to January 2020, identified those who underwent percutaneous leaflet repair with MitraClip. Anatomical and functional parameters were assessed by pre-procedure CTA and compared between those with and without residual (≥2) MR.   A total of 25 patients were included (median[Q1, Q3]; age, 80[75, 85]; 44% men) and classified into ventricular FMR (V-FMR, n = 12) and atrial FMR (A-FMR, n = 13) according to anatomical and functional characteristics by CTA. 50% of V-FMR and 38% of A-FMR had residual/worsening MR. Among V-FMR patients with residual/worsening MR, shorter coaptation length was observed (2.2[2, 2.3] mm vs. 3.5[3, 4], p = 0.006) (Figure). No differences in anatomical or functional characteristics were seen in A-FMR patients. Longer coaptation length in V-FMR is predictive of successful MitraClip procedure, whereas mitral annulus size and cardiac volumes are not. Total (N = 12) No residual/no worsening MR (N = 6) Residual/worsening MR (N = 6) P value Septal-lateral diameter, mm 31.9 (30.5, 37.9) 32.2 (30.1, 39.8) 31.9 (29.5, 35) 0.749 Annulus area, cm² 11.2 (10.4, 13.6) 11.3 (10.1, 14.6) 11.1 (9.6, 12.6) 0.631 Tenting area, cm² 1.6 (1.3, 2.1) 1.6 (1.2, 2.2) 1.7 (1.2, 2.3) 0.873 Tenting height, mm 8.5 (6.5, 9.7) 8.5 (6.6, 9.3) 8.3 (6.3, 10.1) 0.749 Coaptation length, mm 2.6 (2.1, 3.5) 3.5 (3.0, 4.0) 2.2 (2.0, 2.3) 0.006 Total (N = 13) No residual/no worsening MR (N = 8) Residual/worsening MR (N = 5) P value Septal-lateral diameter, mm 32.3 (29.5, 39.0) 32.0 (29.2, 39.9) 34.3 (30.8, 39.02) 0.464 Annulus area, cm² 10.3 (9.2, 14.7) 10.2 (9.0, 14.6) 12.4 (9.4, 14.7) 0.661 Tenting area, cm² 1.2 (0.8, 1.8) 1.1 (0.7, 2.2) 1.3 (0.7, 1.8) 0.884 Tenting height, mm 5.5 (4.1, 6.9) 6.3 (4.1, 8.7) 4.6 (3.7, 5.8) 0.213 Coaptation length, mm 2.3 (1.5, 2.8) 2.5 (1.4, 3.5) 1.9 (1.5, 2.6) 0.464 Comparison of baseline CT parameters between no residual/ no worsening MR and residual/ worsening MR Abstract Figure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Echocardiography
European Journal of Echocardiography 医学-心血管系统
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信