{"title":"原发性腹膜后肉瘤比棒球还小时,积极切除是否有益?——倾向评分匹配分析","authors":"Aobo Zhuang , Qian Wu , Fuan Xie , Jialiang Zheng , Geng Zhang , Weiqi Lu , Yuhong Zhou , Hanxing Tong , Yong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cson.2022.100002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Multivisceral resection (MVR) is advocated by some high-volume sarcoma centers. The objective of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of MVR in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) with tumor burden less than 10 cm.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of patients with primary RPS who underwent radical surgical resection from 2009 to 2021 with lesions smaller than the size of a baseball (10 cm) was carried out. The incidence of postoperative morbidity and postoperative local recurrence-free survival rate of the MVR group and the non-MVR group were compared by propensity score-matching analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 319 patients with primary RPS underwent surgical resection, of which 95 patients (29.8%) had a tumor burden less than 10 cm, with 24 patients (25.3%) involved in the MVR group and 71 patients (74.7%) in the non-MVR group. After matching, the two groups showed no statistical difference at baseline, while the MVR group reported more postoperative complications (P = 0.008) and a longer median postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.002). In terms of local recurrence-free survival, there were no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.269).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Primary RPS patients with tumors smaller than baseball may not benefit from aggressive surgical strategy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100278,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","volume":"1 1","pages":"Article 100002"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X22000022/pdfft?md5=8f303aaa5be271d65dad3f2bf06050b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X22000022-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can primary retroperitoneal sarcoma benefit from aggressive resection when it is smaller than a baseball? ——A propensity score-matched analysis\",\"authors\":\"Aobo Zhuang , Qian Wu , Fuan Xie , Jialiang Zheng , Geng Zhang , Weiqi Lu , Yuhong Zhou , Hanxing Tong , Yong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cson.2022.100002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><p>Multivisceral resection (MVR) is advocated by some high-volume sarcoma centers. The objective of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of MVR in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) with tumor burden less than 10 cm.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of patients with primary RPS who underwent radical surgical resection from 2009 to 2021 with lesions smaller than the size of a baseball (10 cm) was carried out. The incidence of postoperative morbidity and postoperative local recurrence-free survival rate of the MVR group and the non-MVR group were compared by propensity score-matching analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 319 patients with primary RPS underwent surgical resection, of which 95 patients (29.8%) had a tumor burden less than 10 cm, with 24 patients (25.3%) involved in the MVR group and 71 patients (74.7%) in the non-MVR group. After matching, the two groups showed no statistical difference at baseline, while the MVR group reported more postoperative complications (P = 0.008) and a longer median postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.002). In terms of local recurrence-free survival, there were no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.269).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Primary RPS patients with tumors smaller than baseball may not benefit from aggressive surgical strategy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X22000022/pdfft?md5=8f303aaa5be271d65dad3f2bf06050b9&pid=1-s2.0-S2773160X22000022-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X22000022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773160X22000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can primary retroperitoneal sarcoma benefit from aggressive resection when it is smaller than a baseball? ——A propensity score-matched analysis
Background and objectives
Multivisceral resection (MVR) is advocated by some high-volume sarcoma centers. The objective of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of MVR in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) with tumor burden less than 10 cm.
Methods
A retrospective analysis of patients with primary RPS who underwent radical surgical resection from 2009 to 2021 with lesions smaller than the size of a baseball (10 cm) was carried out. The incidence of postoperative morbidity and postoperative local recurrence-free survival rate of the MVR group and the non-MVR group were compared by propensity score-matching analysis.
Results
A total of 319 patients with primary RPS underwent surgical resection, of which 95 patients (29.8%) had a tumor burden less than 10 cm, with 24 patients (25.3%) involved in the MVR group and 71 patients (74.7%) in the non-MVR group. After matching, the two groups showed no statistical difference at baseline, while the MVR group reported more postoperative complications (P = 0.008) and a longer median postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.002). In terms of local recurrence-free survival, there were no statistical difference between the two groups (P = 0.269).
Conclusions
Primary RPS patients with tumors smaller than baseball may not benefit from aggressive surgical strategy.