静脉注射依达拉奉治疗肌萎缩性侧索硬化的疗效评价

Christopher Damlos
{"title":"静脉注射依达拉奉治疗肌萎缩性侧索硬化的疗效评价","authors":"Christopher Damlos","doi":"10.12788/fp.0373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Edaravone has been shown to slow functional degeneration of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The primary objective of this study was to assess ALS disease progression in veterans on IV edaravone compared with veterans who received standard of care. Methods: This retrospective case-control study was conducted at a large, academic US Department of Veteran Affairs medical center. The primary endpoint was the change in baseline Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) scores after 6 months of IV edaravone compared with standard-of-care ALS management. The secondary outcomes included change in ALSFRS-R scores, percent forced vital capacity (%FVC) and speech intelligibility stage (SIS) 3 to 24 months after initiation of therapy, duration of edaravone completed (months), time to death (months), and safety outcomes. Results: Twenty-one edaravone and 42 standard-of-care patients were evaluated. No difference was noted in ALSFRS-R at 6 months between the edaravone and standard-of-care groups ( P = .84). Additionally, no difference was noted in change from baseline %FVC, change from baseline SIS, and time to death between the 2 groups ( P > .05). No safety events were reported in either group. Conclusions: No difference was noted in the rate of ALS disease progression between patients who received IV edaravone vs standard of care.","PeriodicalId":94009,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of IV Edaravone Use in the Management of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Damlos\",\"doi\":\"10.12788/fp.0373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Edaravone has been shown to slow functional degeneration of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The primary objective of this study was to assess ALS disease progression in veterans on IV edaravone compared with veterans who received standard of care. Methods: This retrospective case-control study was conducted at a large, academic US Department of Veteran Affairs medical center. The primary endpoint was the change in baseline Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) scores after 6 months of IV edaravone compared with standard-of-care ALS management. The secondary outcomes included change in ALSFRS-R scores, percent forced vital capacity (%FVC) and speech intelligibility stage (SIS) 3 to 24 months after initiation of therapy, duration of edaravone completed (months), time to death (months), and safety outcomes. Results: Twenty-one edaravone and 42 standard-of-care patients were evaluated. No difference was noted in ALSFRS-R at 6 months between the edaravone and standard-of-care groups ( P = .84). Additionally, no difference was noted in change from baseline %FVC, change from baseline SIS, and time to death between the 2 groups ( P > .05). No safety events were reported in either group. Conclusions: No difference was noted in the rate of ALS disease progression between patients who received IV edaravone vs standard of care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:依达拉奉已被证明可以减缓肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)的功能退化。本研究的主要目的是评估静脉注射依达拉奉的退伍军人与接受标准治疗的退伍军人的ALS疾病进展情况。方法:本回顾性病例对照研究在美国退伍军人事务部医学中心进行。主要终点是与ALS标准治疗相比,静脉注射依达拉奉6个月后,基线修订肌萎缩侧索硬化症功能评定量表(ALSFRS-R)评分的变化。次要结果包括ALSFRS-R评分的变化,治疗开始后3至24个月的用力肺活量百分比(%FVC)和言语可理解阶段(SIS),依达拉丰完成时间(月),死亡时间(月)和安全性结果。结果:对21例依达拉奉患者和42例标准治疗患者进行了评估。依达拉奉组和标准治疗组6个月时ALSFRS-R无差异(P = 0.84)。此外,两组患者FVC的基线变化、SIS的基线变化和死亡时间无差异(P > 0.05)。两组均无安全事件报告。结论:接受静脉依达拉奉治疗的患者与接受标准治疗的患者在ALS疾病进展率方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of IV Edaravone Use in the Management of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Background: Edaravone has been shown to slow functional degeneration of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The primary objective of this study was to assess ALS disease progression in veterans on IV edaravone compared with veterans who received standard of care. Methods: This retrospective case-control study was conducted at a large, academic US Department of Veteran Affairs medical center. The primary endpoint was the change in baseline Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) scores after 6 months of IV edaravone compared with standard-of-care ALS management. The secondary outcomes included change in ALSFRS-R scores, percent forced vital capacity (%FVC) and speech intelligibility stage (SIS) 3 to 24 months after initiation of therapy, duration of edaravone completed (months), time to death (months), and safety outcomes. Results: Twenty-one edaravone and 42 standard-of-care patients were evaluated. No difference was noted in ALSFRS-R at 6 months between the edaravone and standard-of-care groups ( P = .84). Additionally, no difference was noted in change from baseline %FVC, change from baseline SIS, and time to death between the 2 groups ( P > .05). No safety events were reported in either group. Conclusions: No difference was noted in the rate of ALS disease progression between patients who received IV edaravone vs standard of care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信