{"title":"全球价值链与国际贸易动态","authors":"Deeparghya Mukherjee, R. Chanda","doi":"10.1177/00157325221106280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International trade through global value chains (GVCs) has helped the world split production of various goods and services across countries over time, providing a new dimension to globalisation (Gereffi et al., 2001). This has resulted in most products being ‘made in the world’. The story of comparative advantage in production of commodities stands modified as ‘comparative advantage in tasks’ (Blinder, 2006). Today, developing economies have the option of specialising in exportable tasks which could serve as the engine of trade-driven economic growth (Kummritz et al., 2017). Accordingly, trade agreements have proliferated to facilitate trade in parts and components. However, recent de-globalisation trends—including, the US–China trade war, the withdrawal of the USA and India from the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreements, respectively, the muted effectiveness of the WTO’s dispute settlement system and, most recently, the disruption of global trade and supply chains due to the COVID-19 crisis and the ongoing Ukraine crisis—raise questions about the future prospects of GVCs and more broadly about the future of globalisation (Amiti et al., 2019; Baldwin & Tomiura, 2020; Miroudot & Nordström, 2020). There are a number of academic questions that these developments generate, and this special issue entitled ‘Global Value Chains and International Trade Dynamics’ deals with a subset of these questions. We are grateful to the editor, Foreign Trade Review, and his/her team for giving us the opportunity to guest edit this special issue. The six articles included in this special issue may be broadly divided into three specific themes. The first two articles have a global canvas and address questions such as the effect of GVC participation on long-term growth and the effects of deglobalisation on Chinese involvement in GVCs and associated ramifications. The third and fourth articles concentrate on two specific sectors, namely the garment and wearing apparel sector and the automotive sector in India, and examine India’s participation in these sectoral GVCs. The last two articles address questions on the effect of GVC participation on genderbased wage gap and the problems faced by Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in participating in GVCs. Both the articles are based on experiences in India. The implications of GVC participation for long-term economic growth is a fundamental question. Camila do Carmo Hermida, Anderson Moreira Aristides Editorial","PeriodicalId":29933,"journal":{"name":"Foreign Trade Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Value Chains and International Trade Dynamics\",\"authors\":\"Deeparghya Mukherjee, R. Chanda\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00157325221106280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"International trade through global value chains (GVCs) has helped the world split production of various goods and services across countries over time, providing a new dimension to globalisation (Gereffi et al., 2001). This has resulted in most products being ‘made in the world’. The story of comparative advantage in production of commodities stands modified as ‘comparative advantage in tasks’ (Blinder, 2006). Today, developing economies have the option of specialising in exportable tasks which could serve as the engine of trade-driven economic growth (Kummritz et al., 2017). Accordingly, trade agreements have proliferated to facilitate trade in parts and components. However, recent de-globalisation trends—including, the US–China trade war, the withdrawal of the USA and India from the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreements, respectively, the muted effectiveness of the WTO’s dispute settlement system and, most recently, the disruption of global trade and supply chains due to the COVID-19 crisis and the ongoing Ukraine crisis—raise questions about the future prospects of GVCs and more broadly about the future of globalisation (Amiti et al., 2019; Baldwin & Tomiura, 2020; Miroudot & Nordström, 2020). There are a number of academic questions that these developments generate, and this special issue entitled ‘Global Value Chains and International Trade Dynamics’ deals with a subset of these questions. We are grateful to the editor, Foreign Trade Review, and his/her team for giving us the opportunity to guest edit this special issue. The six articles included in this special issue may be broadly divided into three specific themes. The first two articles have a global canvas and address questions such as the effect of GVC participation on long-term growth and the effects of deglobalisation on Chinese involvement in GVCs and associated ramifications. The third and fourth articles concentrate on two specific sectors, namely the garment and wearing apparel sector and the automotive sector in India, and examine India’s participation in these sectoral GVCs. The last two articles address questions on the effect of GVC participation on genderbased wage gap and the problems faced by Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in participating in GVCs. Both the articles are based on experiences in India. The implications of GVC participation for long-term economic growth is a fundamental question. Camila do Carmo Hermida, Anderson Moreira Aristides Editorial\",\"PeriodicalId\":29933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foreign Trade Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foreign Trade Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00157325221106280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foreign Trade Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00157325221106280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
随着时间的推移,通过全球价值链(GVCs)进行的国际贸易帮助世界各国分离了各种商品和服务的生产,为全球化提供了一个新的维度(Gereffi et al., 2001)。这导致了大多数产品都是“世界制造”。商品生产中的比较优势被修改为“任务中的比较优势”(Blinder, 2006)。今天,发展中经济体可以选择专门从事可出口的任务,这些任务可以作为贸易驱动型经济增长的引擎(Kummritz等人,2017)。因此,促进零部件贸易的贸易协定激增。然而,最近的去全球化趋势——包括中美贸易战、美国和印度分别退出《全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(CPTPP)和《区域全面经济伙伴关系协定》(RCEP)、世界贸易组织争端解决机制效力减弱,以及最近,由于COVID-19危机和正在进行的乌克兰危机导致的全球贸易和供应链中断,对全球价值链的未来前景提出了问题,更广泛地说,对全球化的未来提出了问题(Amiti等人,2019;Baldwin & Tomiura, 2020;Miroudot & Nordström, 2020)。这些发展产生了许多学术问题,本期题为《全球价值链与国际贸易动态》的特刊讨论了这些问题的一个子集。我们非常感谢《对外贸易评论》的编辑和他/她的团队给我们这个特刊的客座编辑机会。本期特刊的六篇文章大致可分为三个具体主题。前两篇文章以全球为背景,探讨了全球价值链参与对长期增长的影响、去全球化对中国参与全球价值链的影响及其相关后果等问题。第三篇和第四篇文章集中在两个特定行业,即印度的服装和穿戴服装行业和汽车行业,并研究了印度在这些行业全球价值链中的参与情况。最后两篇文章讨论了参与全球价值链对性别工资差距的影响以及微型中小企业(MSMEs)参与全球价值链所面临的问题。这两篇文章都是基于印度的经历。全球价值链参与对长期经济增长的影响是一个根本性问题。Camila do Carmo Hermida, Anderson Moreira Aristides社论
Global Value Chains and International Trade Dynamics
International trade through global value chains (GVCs) has helped the world split production of various goods and services across countries over time, providing a new dimension to globalisation (Gereffi et al., 2001). This has resulted in most products being ‘made in the world’. The story of comparative advantage in production of commodities stands modified as ‘comparative advantage in tasks’ (Blinder, 2006). Today, developing economies have the option of specialising in exportable tasks which could serve as the engine of trade-driven economic growth (Kummritz et al., 2017). Accordingly, trade agreements have proliferated to facilitate trade in parts and components. However, recent de-globalisation trends—including, the US–China trade war, the withdrawal of the USA and India from the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreements, respectively, the muted effectiveness of the WTO’s dispute settlement system and, most recently, the disruption of global trade and supply chains due to the COVID-19 crisis and the ongoing Ukraine crisis—raise questions about the future prospects of GVCs and more broadly about the future of globalisation (Amiti et al., 2019; Baldwin & Tomiura, 2020; Miroudot & Nordström, 2020). There are a number of academic questions that these developments generate, and this special issue entitled ‘Global Value Chains and International Trade Dynamics’ deals with a subset of these questions. We are grateful to the editor, Foreign Trade Review, and his/her team for giving us the opportunity to guest edit this special issue. The six articles included in this special issue may be broadly divided into three specific themes. The first two articles have a global canvas and address questions such as the effect of GVC participation on long-term growth and the effects of deglobalisation on Chinese involvement in GVCs and associated ramifications. The third and fourth articles concentrate on two specific sectors, namely the garment and wearing apparel sector and the automotive sector in India, and examine India’s participation in these sectoral GVCs. The last two articles address questions on the effect of GVC participation on genderbased wage gap and the problems faced by Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) in participating in GVCs. Both the articles are based on experiences in India. The implications of GVC participation for long-term economic growth is a fundamental question. Camila do Carmo Hermida, Anderson Moreira Aristides Editorial