双弯迷宫入口捕获γ射线剂量当量蒙特卡罗模拟与分析方法与测量

Q3 Health Professions
Reza Eghdam-Zamiri, Hosein Ghiasi
{"title":"双弯迷宫入口捕获γ射线剂量当量蒙特卡罗模拟与分析方法与测量","authors":"Reza Eghdam-Zamiri, Hosein Ghiasi","doi":"10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The production of the secondary neutron in the high-energy megavoltage medical accelerator machines has been extensively studied. In this study, MCNP5 MC code and two analytical methods, the proposed method and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 47 proposed method were used to capture γ-ray dose equivalent calculation. \nMaterials and Methods: MCNP5 code of the MC simulation method was used for code calculation in this study. The main components of a Varian 2100Clinac were simulated as well as a 30×30×30 cm3 water phantom, in a Source to Surface Distance (SSD) of 100cm. Apparent neutron source strength (QN) was obtained using F1, *F8 tallies, and a small scoring cell at the isocenter with a mass equal to 0.625g. \nResults: QN was obtained as 1.25 n/Gy X for the simulated Linear Accelerators )linac( head and was used in the other calculations. In the simulated double-bend maze treatment room with first and second lengths of the maze as 7m and 3m, the proposed method calculated capture γ-ray dose with 6.2% and 60% differences compared with MC simulation and IAEA 47 methods, respectively. \nConclusion: We concluded that Ghiasi and Mesbahi's proposed method performed better in capturing γ-ray dose equivalent calculation compared to IAEA 47 report. The proposed method reduced the difference from 60% to 6.2%.","PeriodicalId":34203,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capture γ-Ray Dose Equivalent at Double-Bend Maze Entrance; Monte Carlo Simulation and Analytical Methods and Measurements\",\"authors\":\"Reza Eghdam-Zamiri, Hosein Ghiasi\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11508\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The production of the secondary neutron in the high-energy megavoltage medical accelerator machines has been extensively studied. In this study, MCNP5 MC code and two analytical methods, the proposed method and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 47 proposed method were used to capture γ-ray dose equivalent calculation. \\nMaterials and Methods: MCNP5 code of the MC simulation method was used for code calculation in this study. The main components of a Varian 2100Clinac were simulated as well as a 30×30×30 cm3 water phantom, in a Source to Surface Distance (SSD) of 100cm. Apparent neutron source strength (QN) was obtained using F1, *F8 tallies, and a small scoring cell at the isocenter with a mass equal to 0.625g. \\nResults: QN was obtained as 1.25 n/Gy X for the simulated Linear Accelerators )linac( head and was used in the other calculations. In the simulated double-bend maze treatment room with first and second lengths of the maze as 7m and 3m, the proposed method calculated capture γ-ray dose with 6.2% and 60% differences compared with MC simulation and IAEA 47 methods, respectively. \\nConclusion: We concluded that Ghiasi and Mesbahi's proposed method performed better in capturing γ-ray dose equivalent calculation compared to IAEA 47 report. The proposed method reduced the difference from 60% to 6.2%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11508\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v10i1.11508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对高能超高电压医用加速器中二次中子的产生进行了广泛的研究。在本研究中,MCNP5 MC代码和两种解析方法,即国际原子能机构(IAEA) 47提出的方法分别用于捕获γ射线剂量当量的计算。材料与方法:本研究采用MC模拟法的MCNP5代码进行代码计算。模拟了瓦里安2100Clinac的主要部件以及30×30×30 cm3水模体,源到表面距离(SSD)为100cm。利用F1, *F8计数和质量为0.625g的等中心小记分池获得中子源的表观强度(QN)。结果:模拟直线加速器直线头的QN为1.25 n/Gy X,并用于其他计算。在第一段和第二段迷宫长度分别为7m和3m的模拟双弯迷宫治疗室中,与MC模拟和IAEA 47方法相比,本文方法计算的捕获γ射线剂量分别相差6.2%和60%。结论:Ghiasi和Mesbahi提出的方法在捕获γ射线剂量当量计算方面优于IAEA 47报告。该方法将差异从60%减小到6.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Capture γ-Ray Dose Equivalent at Double-Bend Maze Entrance; Monte Carlo Simulation and Analytical Methods and Measurements
Purpose: The production of the secondary neutron in the high-energy megavoltage medical accelerator machines has been extensively studied. In this study, MCNP5 MC code and two analytical methods, the proposed method and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) 47 proposed method were used to capture γ-ray dose equivalent calculation. Materials and Methods: MCNP5 code of the MC simulation method was used for code calculation in this study. The main components of a Varian 2100Clinac were simulated as well as a 30×30×30 cm3 water phantom, in a Source to Surface Distance (SSD) of 100cm. Apparent neutron source strength (QN) was obtained using F1, *F8 tallies, and a small scoring cell at the isocenter with a mass equal to 0.625g. Results: QN was obtained as 1.25 n/Gy X for the simulated Linear Accelerators )linac( head and was used in the other calculations. In the simulated double-bend maze treatment room with first and second lengths of the maze as 7m and 3m, the proposed method calculated capture γ-ray dose with 6.2% and 60% differences compared with MC simulation and IAEA 47 methods, respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that Ghiasi and Mesbahi's proposed method performed better in capturing γ-ray dose equivalent calculation compared to IAEA 47 report. The proposed method reduced the difference from 60% to 6.2%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信