Mala Vicinanza: 16世纪佛罗伦萨女性户主与性工作的关系

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Catherine Kerton-Johnson, Brandon Whitsit, J. DeSilva
{"title":"Mala Vicinanza: 16世纪佛罗伦萨女性户主与性工作的关系","authors":"Catherine Kerton-Johnson, Brandon Whitsit, J. DeSilva","doi":"10.33137/rr.v45i4.41380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In mid-sixteenth-century Florence the need to fund Santa Elisabetta delle Convertite, the convent sheltering retired sex workers, prompted the introduction of a higher tax on sex workers that offered freedom from identifying signs, geographic restrictions, and the title of meretrice. The result was precisely the diffusion of sex workers across the city that previous legislation has sought to avoid. While legislation identified sex workers’ mala vicinanza (evil proximity) as the justification for creating buffer zones around convents, conversely it also allowed sex workers to live within those buffer zones if they exhibited modestia e bontà (modesty and goodness). This unlikely loophole privileged Santa Elisabetta’s needs while allowing the segregation policy to fail. Using the 1561 decima census, this article tracks the residence of sex workers near to unenclosed female household-heads in an effort to explore the effect of Florentine magistrates’ ambivalence towards poor working women and the segregation policy’s failure.","PeriodicalId":43520,"journal":{"name":"RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mala Vicinanza: Female Household-Heads and Proximity to Sex Work in Sixteenth-Century Florence\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Kerton-Johnson, Brandon Whitsit, J. DeSilva\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/rr.v45i4.41380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In mid-sixteenth-century Florence the need to fund Santa Elisabetta delle Convertite, the convent sheltering retired sex workers, prompted the introduction of a higher tax on sex workers that offered freedom from identifying signs, geographic restrictions, and the title of meretrice. The result was precisely the diffusion of sex workers across the city that previous legislation has sought to avoid. While legislation identified sex workers’ mala vicinanza (evil proximity) as the justification for creating buffer zones around convents, conversely it also allowed sex workers to live within those buffer zones if they exhibited modestia e bontà (modesty and goodness). This unlikely loophole privileged Santa Elisabetta’s needs while allowing the segregation policy to fail. Using the 1561 decima census, this article tracks the residence of sex workers near to unenclosed female household-heads in an effort to explore the effect of Florentine magistrates’ ambivalence towards poor working women and the segregation policy’s failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/rr.v45i4.41380\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/rr.v45i4.41380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在16世纪中期的佛罗伦萨,由于需要资助圣伊丽莎白·德勒·科维尔蒂修道院(Santa Elisabetta delle Convertite),这是一所庇护退休性工作者的修道院,促使人们对性工作者征收更高的税,从而使他们免受识别标志、地理限制和meretrice头衔的限制。其结果恰恰是性工作者在整个城市的扩散,这是之前的立法试图避免的。虽然立法认定性工作者的“邪恶接近”(mala vicinanza)是在修道院周围建立缓冲区的理由,但反过来,如果性工作者表现出谦虚和善良,也允许她们生活在这些缓冲区内。这个看似不可能的漏洞让圣伊丽莎白得到了特权,却让种族隔离政策失败了。本文利用1561年的人口普查数据,追踪性工作者在非封闭女性户主附近的居住情况,以探讨佛罗伦萨地方官员对贫困职业妇女的矛盾心理和隔离政策的失败所造成的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mala Vicinanza: Female Household-Heads and Proximity to Sex Work in Sixteenth-Century Florence
In mid-sixteenth-century Florence the need to fund Santa Elisabetta delle Convertite, the convent sheltering retired sex workers, prompted the introduction of a higher tax on sex workers that offered freedom from identifying signs, geographic restrictions, and the title of meretrice. The result was precisely the diffusion of sex workers across the city that previous legislation has sought to avoid. While legislation identified sex workers’ mala vicinanza (evil proximity) as the justification for creating buffer zones around convents, conversely it also allowed sex workers to live within those buffer zones if they exhibited modestia e bontà (modesty and goodness). This unlikely loophole privileged Santa Elisabetta’s needs while allowing the segregation policy to fail. Using the 1561 decima census, this article tracks the residence of sex workers near to unenclosed female household-heads in an effort to explore the effect of Florentine magistrates’ ambivalence towards poor working women and the segregation policy’s failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION
RENAISSANCE AND REFORMATION MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: The Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies (CRRS) is a research and teaching centre with a library devoted to the study of the period from approximately 1350 to 1700. The CRRS supervises an undergraduate program in Renaissance Studies, organizes lectures and seminars, and maintains an active series of publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信