小母牛发育系统对2个繁殖季节后续生长繁殖的影响

S.A. Springman, H.R. Nielson, R.N. Funston
{"title":"小母牛发育系统对2个繁殖季节后续生长繁殖的影响","authors":"S.A. Springman,&nbsp;H.R. Nielson,&nbsp;R.N. Funston","doi":"10.15232/pas.2017-01697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>A 4-yr study evaluated the effects of heifer development system on growth and reproductive performance in 2 breeding seasons. March- and May-born, crossbred heifers were stratified by BW and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments from mid-January to mid-April: (1) ad libitum meadow hay (7.3% CP; 54.3% TDN) and 1.64 kg/d of a 32% CP supplement (HY) or (2) meadow grazing (10.3% CP; 61.7% TDN) and 0.41 kg/d supplement (MDW). In the March-born heifers, ADG during treatment was greater (</span><em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) for HY than MDW heifers (0.78 vs. 0.51<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.03 kg; HY, MDW), with similar pregnancy rates (<em>P</em><span> = 0.92). Calving rate and the proportion of heifers that calved in the first 21 d was also similar (</span><em>P</em> ≥ 0.33). Similarly, May-born heifers on HY treatment had greater ADG (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01; 0.59 vs. 0.35<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.05 kg; HY, MDW) during the treatment period, with similar (<em>P</em> = 0.69) pregnancy rates. Calving rate did not differ (<em>P</em> = 0.88) between treatments, although the proportion of heifers that calved in the first 21 d was greater (<em>P</em> = 0.02) for MDW compared with HY. Overall, heifer development system did not affect pregnancy rate in March or May replacement heifers; however, pregnancy rate of March-born heifers was greater (<em>P</em><span> &lt; 0.01) than May-born (87 vs. 70 ± 3%). The reduced pregnancy rate in May heifers may be due to declining forage quality during the late-summer breeding season and may require additional inputs to equal pregnancy rates of the March-born heifers.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":22841,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Animal Scientist","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 177-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2017-01697","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of heifer development system on subsequent growth and reproduction in 2 breeding seasons\",\"authors\":\"S.A. Springman,&nbsp;H.R. Nielson,&nbsp;R.N. Funston\",\"doi\":\"10.15232/pas.2017-01697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>A 4-yr study evaluated the effects of heifer development system on growth and reproductive performance in 2 breeding seasons. March- and May-born, crossbred heifers were stratified by BW and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments from mid-January to mid-April: (1) ad libitum meadow hay (7.3% CP; 54.3% TDN) and 1.64 kg/d of a 32% CP supplement (HY) or (2) meadow grazing (10.3% CP; 61.7% TDN) and 0.41 kg/d supplement (MDW). In the March-born heifers, ADG during treatment was greater (</span><em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) for HY than MDW heifers (0.78 vs. 0.51<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.03 kg; HY, MDW), with similar pregnancy rates (<em>P</em><span> = 0.92). Calving rate and the proportion of heifers that calved in the first 21 d was also similar (</span><em>P</em> ≥ 0.33). Similarly, May-born heifers on HY treatment had greater ADG (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01; 0.59 vs. 0.35<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.05 kg; HY, MDW) during the treatment period, with similar (<em>P</em> = 0.69) pregnancy rates. Calving rate did not differ (<em>P</em> = 0.88) between treatments, although the proportion of heifers that calved in the first 21 d was greater (<em>P</em> = 0.02) for MDW compared with HY. Overall, heifer development system did not affect pregnancy rate in March or May replacement heifers; however, pregnancy rate of March-born heifers was greater (<em>P</em><span> &lt; 0.01) than May-born (87 vs. 70 ± 3%). The reduced pregnancy rate in May heifers may be due to declining forage quality during the late-summer breeding season and may require additional inputs to equal pregnancy rates of the March-born heifers.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Professional Animal Scientist\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 177-182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2017-01697\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Professional Animal Scientist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618300305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Animal Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618300305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一项为期4年的研究评估了两个繁殖季节小母牛发育系统对生长和繁殖性能的影响。3月和5月出生的杂交小母牛按体重分层,从1月中旬到4月中旬随机分为2个处理:(1)随意饲喂草甸干草(7.3% CP;32%粗蛋白质补充(HY)和(2)草甸放牧(10.3%粗蛋白质;61.7% TDN)和0.41 kg/d添加量(MDW)。在三月出生的小母牛中,治疗期间的平均日增重更大(P <0.01) (0.78 vs. 0.51±0.03 kg;HY, MDW),妊娠率相似(P = 0.92)。犊牛产犊率和犊牛前21 d产犊比例差异无统计学意义(P≥0.33)。同样,5月出生的小母牛在HY治疗下具有更高的平均日增重(P <0.01;0.59 vs. 0.35±0.05 kg;治疗期间妊娠率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.69)。不同处理的犊牛产仔率差异不显著(P = 0.88),但MDW组犊牛头21 d产仔率高于HY组(P = 0.02)。总体而言,3月和5月犊牛的发育系统对犊牛妊娠率没有影响;然而,三月出生的小母牛的怀孕率更高(P <5月出生者(87∶70±3%)高于5月出生者(0.01)。5月出生的小母牛怀孕率下降可能是由于夏末繁殖季节饲料质量下降,可能需要额外的投入来达到3月出生的小母牛的怀孕率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of heifer development system on subsequent growth and reproduction in 2 breeding seasons

A 4-yr study evaluated the effects of heifer development system on growth and reproductive performance in 2 breeding seasons. March- and May-born, crossbred heifers were stratified by BW and randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments from mid-January to mid-April: (1) ad libitum meadow hay (7.3% CP; 54.3% TDN) and 1.64 kg/d of a 32% CP supplement (HY) or (2) meadow grazing (10.3% CP; 61.7% TDN) and 0.41 kg/d supplement (MDW). In the March-born heifers, ADG during treatment was greater (P < 0.01) for HY than MDW heifers (0.78 vs. 0.51 ± 0.03 kg; HY, MDW), with similar pregnancy rates (P = 0.92). Calving rate and the proportion of heifers that calved in the first 21 d was also similar (P ≥ 0.33). Similarly, May-born heifers on HY treatment had greater ADG (P < 0.01; 0.59 vs. 0.35 ± 0.05 kg; HY, MDW) during the treatment period, with similar (P = 0.69) pregnancy rates. Calving rate did not differ (P = 0.88) between treatments, although the proportion of heifers that calved in the first 21 d was greater (P = 0.02) for MDW compared with HY. Overall, heifer development system did not affect pregnancy rate in March or May replacement heifers; however, pregnancy rate of March-born heifers was greater (P < 0.01) than May-born (87 vs. 70 ± 3%). The reduced pregnancy rate in May heifers may be due to declining forage quality during the late-summer breeding season and may require additional inputs to equal pregnancy rates of the March-born heifers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信