Pirngadi医生医院牙切断术患者丝缝线与线缝线细菌菌落粘附比较

Rahmi Syaflida, O. A. Hanafiah, Ahyar Riza, Muhammad R. Fauzie
{"title":"Pirngadi医生医院牙切断术患者丝缝线与线缝线细菌菌落粘附比较","authors":"Rahmi Syaflida, O. A. Hanafiah, Ahyar Riza, Muhammad R. Fauzie","doi":"10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare the different amount of bacterial colonies adhered on silk and catgut sutures in odontectomy patient at Dr. Pirngadi Hospital from May to July 2018. Material and Methods: This is laboratory experimental study with a “post-test only control group” design which means the threads that have been remove on 7th day postoperative and would be transferred to Microbiology Laboratory, Faculty of Mathematic and Science, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Bacterial colony counter were used to count the amount of bacteria colony on a petri dish containing PCA medium after the colonization was diluted to 10 mL. The number of patients studied were 26 people, therefore 13 people used silk sutures and 13 people used catgut sutures. was diluted to 10 mL. The number of patients studied were 26 people, therefore 13 people used silk sutures and 13 people used catgut sutures. Results: Statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney Test. There was no significant difference (p> 0.05) between the amount of bacterial colonies adherence on silk and catgut sutures. The mean bacterial colony on silk sutures are 207.38±173.605 x10 CFU/mL, meanwhile on catgut sutures are 115.15±158.905 x10 CFU/mL. Conclusion: Catgut suture could minimalize bacterial colonization better than silk suture. Keyword: Bacterial colonization, Odontectomy, Oral bacteria, Surgical suture materials Cite this Article: Syaflida R, Hanafiah OA, Riza A, Fauzie MR. 2021. Comparison of bacterial colonies adherence on silk and catgut sutures in odontectomy patient at Dr. Pirngadi Hospital. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 6(3): 175-179. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v6i3.842 Comparison of bacterial colonies adherence on silk and catgut sutures in odontectomy patient at Dr. Pirngadi Hospital Rahmi Syaflida,* Olivia A. Hanafiah, Ahyar Riza, M. Rifqi Fauzie*","PeriodicalId":31119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of bacterial colonies adherence on silk and catgut sutures in odontectomy patient at Dr. Pirngadi Hospital\",\"authors\":\"Rahmi Syaflida, O. A. Hanafiah, Ahyar Riza, Muhammad R. Fauzie\",\"doi\":\"10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare the different amount of bacterial colonies adhered on silk and catgut sutures in odontectomy patient at Dr. Pirngadi Hospital from May to July 2018. Material and Methods: This is laboratory experimental study with a “post-test only control group” design which means the threads that have been remove on 7th day postoperative and would be transferred to Microbiology Laboratory, Faculty of Mathematic and Science, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Bacterial colony counter were used to count the amount of bacteria colony on a petri dish containing PCA medium after the colonization was diluted to 10 mL. The number of patients studied were 26 people, therefore 13 people used silk sutures and 13 people used catgut sutures. was diluted to 10 mL. The number of patients studied were 26 people, therefore 13 people used silk sutures and 13 people used catgut sutures. Results: Statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney Test. There was no significant difference (p> 0.05) between the amount of bacterial colonies adherence on silk and catgut sutures. The mean bacterial colony on silk sutures are 207.38±173.605 x10 CFU/mL, meanwhile on catgut sutures are 115.15±158.905 x10 CFU/mL. Conclusion: Catgut suture could minimalize bacterial colonization better than silk suture. Keyword: Bacterial colonization, Odontectomy, Oral bacteria, Surgical suture materials Cite this Article: Syaflida R, Hanafiah OA, Riza A, Fauzie MR. 2021. Comparison of bacterial colonies adherence on silk and catgut sutures in odontectomy patient at Dr. Pirngadi Hospital. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 6(3): 175-179. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v6i3.842 Comparison of bacterial colonies adherence on silk and catgut sutures in odontectomy patient at Dr. Pirngadi Hospital Rahmi Syaflida,* Olivia A. Hanafiah, Ahyar Riza, M. Rifqi Fauzie*\",\"PeriodicalId\":31119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15562/jdmfs.v0i0.842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较2018年5月至7月在Pirngadi医生医院进行的牙切断术患者丝缝线和线缝线上的细菌菌落粘附量的差异。材料和方法:这是一项实验室实验研究,采用“仅限测试后对照组”设计,这意味着在术后第7天拆除的螺纹将转移到苏门答腊岛大学数学与科学学院微生物实验室。在含有PCA培养基的培养皿中,将定植稀释至10 mL后,用菌落计数器计数细菌的菌落数量。研究的患者人数为26人,因此有13人使用丝缝线,13人使用线缝线。稀释至10 mL。研究的患者人数为26人,因此13人使用丝缝合线,13人使用线缝合线。结果:采用Mann-Whitney检验进行统计学分析。丝线和线缝线上的细菌菌落粘附量无显著差异(p> 0.05)。丝线缝合线平均菌落为207.38±173.605 × 10 CFU/mL,线缝合线平均菌落为115.15±158.905 × 10 CFU/mL。结论:肠线缝合比丝线缝合更能减少细菌的定植。关键词:细菌定植,牙切开术,口腔细菌,手术缝合线材料Pirngadi医生医院牙切断术患者丝缝线与线缝线细菌菌落粘附比较。牙颌面科学杂志,6(3):175-179。Rahmi Syaflida,* Olivia A. Hanafiah, Ahyar Riza, M. Rifqi Fauzie* . DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v6i3.842
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of bacterial colonies adherence on silk and catgut sutures in odontectomy patient at Dr. Pirngadi Hospital
Objective: To compare the different amount of bacterial colonies adhered on silk and catgut sutures in odontectomy patient at Dr. Pirngadi Hospital from May to July 2018. Material and Methods: This is laboratory experimental study with a “post-test only control group” design which means the threads that have been remove on 7th day postoperative and would be transferred to Microbiology Laboratory, Faculty of Mathematic and Science, Universitas Sumatera Utara. Bacterial colony counter were used to count the amount of bacteria colony on a petri dish containing PCA medium after the colonization was diluted to 10 mL. The number of patients studied were 26 people, therefore 13 people used silk sutures and 13 people used catgut sutures. was diluted to 10 mL. The number of patients studied were 26 people, therefore 13 people used silk sutures and 13 people used catgut sutures. Results: Statistically analyzed using Mann-Whitney Test. There was no significant difference (p> 0.05) between the amount of bacterial colonies adherence on silk and catgut sutures. The mean bacterial colony on silk sutures are 207.38±173.605 x10 CFU/mL, meanwhile on catgut sutures are 115.15±158.905 x10 CFU/mL. Conclusion: Catgut suture could minimalize bacterial colonization better than silk suture. Keyword: Bacterial colonization, Odontectomy, Oral bacteria, Surgical suture materials Cite this Article: Syaflida R, Hanafiah OA, Riza A, Fauzie MR. 2021. Comparison of bacterial colonies adherence on silk and catgut sutures in odontectomy patient at Dr. Pirngadi Hospital. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science 6(3): 175-179. DOI: 10.15562/jdmfs.v6i3.842 Comparison of bacterial colonies adherence on silk and catgut sutures in odontectomy patient at Dr. Pirngadi Hospital Rahmi Syaflida,* Olivia A. Hanafiah, Ahyar Riza, M. Rifqi Fauzie*
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信