与儿科重症监护病房镇静脱机方案相关的结果

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Kimberley Harper, Jessica Anderson, Julie S. Pingel, K. Boyle, Li Wang, C. Lindsell, A. Sweeney, Kristina A. Betters
{"title":"与儿科重症监护病房镇静脱机方案相关的结果","authors":"Kimberley Harper, Jessica Anderson, Julie S. Pingel, K. Boyle, Li Wang, C. Lindsell, A. Sweeney, Kristina A. Betters","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1769119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective  This article compares patient outcomes before and after implementation of a risk stratified pediatric sedation weaning protocol. Methods  This observational cohort study, in a 30-bed tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), included patients requiring opioid, benzodiazepine, and/or dexmedetomidine infusions. Outcomes (duration of wean, PICU length of stay [LOS], and Withdrawal Assessment Tool [WAT-1] scores) were collected by retrospective chart review for 12 months before and after protocol implementation. The influence of the protocol was assessed using an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis. Results  There were 49 patients before and 47 patients after protocol implementation. Median opioid wean duration preprotocol was 10.5 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.25, 20.75) versus 9.0 days (IQR: 5.0, 16.75) postprotocol ( p  = 0.66). Median benzodiazepine wean duration was 11.5 days (IQR: 3.0, 19.8) preprotocol versus 5.0 days (IQR: 2.0, 13.5) postprotocol ( p  = 0.31). Median alpha-agonist wean duration was 7.0 days (IQR: 3.5, 17.0) preprotocol versus 3 days (IQR: 1.0, 14.0) postprotocol ( p  = 0.03). The ITS indicated a reduction in opioid wean by 6.7 days ( p  = 0.35), a reduction in benzodiazepine wean by 13.4 days ( p  = 0.12), and a reduction in alpha-agonist wean by 12.9 days ( p  = 0.06). WAT-1 scores > 3 (12.6% preprotocol vs. 9.9% postprotocol, p  = 0.569) and PICU LOS (16.0 days [IQR: 11.0, 26.0] vs. 17.0 days [IQR: 11.0, 26.5], p  = 0.796) did not differ between groups. Conclusion  Implementation of a risk stratified sedation weaning protocol in the PICU was associated with a significant reduction in alpha-agonist wean duration without a significant increase in withdrawal symptoms.","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes Associated with a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Sedation Weaning Protocol\",\"authors\":\"Kimberley Harper, Jessica Anderson, Julie S. Pingel, K. Boyle, Li Wang, C. Lindsell, A. Sweeney, Kristina A. Betters\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1769119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective  This article compares patient outcomes before and after implementation of a risk stratified pediatric sedation weaning protocol. Methods  This observational cohort study, in a 30-bed tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), included patients requiring opioid, benzodiazepine, and/or dexmedetomidine infusions. Outcomes (duration of wean, PICU length of stay [LOS], and Withdrawal Assessment Tool [WAT-1] scores) were collected by retrospective chart review for 12 months before and after protocol implementation. The influence of the protocol was assessed using an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis. Results  There were 49 patients before and 47 patients after protocol implementation. Median opioid wean duration preprotocol was 10.5 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.25, 20.75) versus 9.0 days (IQR: 5.0, 16.75) postprotocol ( p  = 0.66). Median benzodiazepine wean duration was 11.5 days (IQR: 3.0, 19.8) preprotocol versus 5.0 days (IQR: 2.0, 13.5) postprotocol ( p  = 0.31). Median alpha-agonist wean duration was 7.0 days (IQR: 3.5, 17.0) preprotocol versus 3 days (IQR: 1.0, 14.0) postprotocol ( p  = 0.03). The ITS indicated a reduction in opioid wean by 6.7 days ( p  = 0.35), a reduction in benzodiazepine wean by 13.4 days ( p  = 0.12), and a reduction in alpha-agonist wean by 12.9 days ( p  = 0.06). WAT-1 scores > 3 (12.6% preprotocol vs. 9.9% postprotocol, p  = 0.569) and PICU LOS (16.0 days [IQR: 11.0, 26.0] vs. 17.0 days [IQR: 11.0, 26.5], p  = 0.796) did not differ between groups. Conclusion  Implementation of a risk stratified sedation weaning protocol in the PICU was associated with a significant reduction in alpha-agonist wean duration without a significant increase in withdrawal symptoms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1769119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1769119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的比较风险分层儿童镇静断奶方案实施前后的患者结果。方法:本观察性队列研究在30张床位的三级儿科重症监护病房(PICU)进行,包括需要阿片类药物、苯二氮卓类药物和/或右美托咪定输注的患者。通过实施方案前后12个月的回顾性图表回顾,收集结果(断奶时间、PICU住院时间[LOS]和戒断评估工具[watt -1]评分)。使用中断时间序列(ITS)分析评估该方案的影响。结果方案实施前49例,实施后47例。方案前阿片类药物断奶持续时间中位数为10.5天(四分位数间距[IQR]: 4.25, 20.75),方案后为9.0天(IQR: 5.0, 16.75) (p = 0.66)。苯二氮卓类药物断奶持续时间中位数为治疗前11.5天(IQR: 3.0, 19.8),治疗后5.0天(IQR: 2.0, 13.5) (p = 0.31)。治疗前α受体激动剂断奶持续时间中位数为7.0天(IQR: 3.5, 17.0),治疗后为3天(IQR: 1.0, 14.0) (p = 0.03)。ITS显示阿片类药物减少6.7天(p = 0.35),苯二氮卓类药物减少13.4天(p = 0.12), α激动剂减少12.9天(p = 0.06)。WAT-1评分> 3(方案前12.6%比方案后9.9%,p = 0.569)和PICU LOS(16.0天[IQR: 11.0, 26.0]比17.0天[IQR: 11.0, 26.5], p = 0.796)组间无差异。结论:在PICU中实施风险分层镇静断奶方案与α激动剂断奶持续时间的显著减少有关,而戒断症状没有显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes Associated with a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Sedation Weaning Protocol
Abstract Objective  This article compares patient outcomes before and after implementation of a risk stratified pediatric sedation weaning protocol. Methods  This observational cohort study, in a 30-bed tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), included patients requiring opioid, benzodiazepine, and/or dexmedetomidine infusions. Outcomes (duration of wean, PICU length of stay [LOS], and Withdrawal Assessment Tool [WAT-1] scores) were collected by retrospective chart review for 12 months before and after protocol implementation. The influence of the protocol was assessed using an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis. Results  There were 49 patients before and 47 patients after protocol implementation. Median opioid wean duration preprotocol was 10.5 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 4.25, 20.75) versus 9.0 days (IQR: 5.0, 16.75) postprotocol ( p  = 0.66). Median benzodiazepine wean duration was 11.5 days (IQR: 3.0, 19.8) preprotocol versus 5.0 days (IQR: 2.0, 13.5) postprotocol ( p  = 0.31). Median alpha-agonist wean duration was 7.0 days (IQR: 3.5, 17.0) preprotocol versus 3 days (IQR: 1.0, 14.0) postprotocol ( p  = 0.03). The ITS indicated a reduction in opioid wean by 6.7 days ( p  = 0.35), a reduction in benzodiazepine wean by 13.4 days ( p  = 0.12), and a reduction in alpha-agonist wean by 12.9 days ( p  = 0.06). WAT-1 scores > 3 (12.6% preprotocol vs. 9.9% postprotocol, p  = 0.569) and PICU LOS (16.0 days [IQR: 11.0, 26.0] vs. 17.0 days [IQR: 11.0, 26.5], p  = 0.796) did not differ between groups. Conclusion  Implementation of a risk stratified sedation weaning protocol in the PICU was associated with a significant reduction in alpha-agonist wean duration without a significant increase in withdrawal symptoms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
60
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信