作为宏观审慎政策工具的贷款价值比限制:理论与实践的发展

IF 5.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
William Gatt
{"title":"作为宏观审慎政策工具的贷款价值比限制:理论与实践的发展","authors":"William Gatt","doi":"10.1111/joes.12548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>I analyze the development of the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio limit for households as a macroprudential policy tool in both theory and practice, by surveying theoretical and empirical literature. I argue that the practical implementation of LTV caps preceded theoretical studies, but research has caught up since the global financial crisis, including research on which indicators seem to work best in flagging a potential future crisis. In practice, LTV ratio limits tend to be effective tools in buffering credit and house price growth, although attributing casual effects in empirical studies is not always straightforward. The benefits of LTV policy seem to outweigh some potential side-effects, such as the output costs of tightening credit. I then survey the recent success with LTV policy in New Zealand and Ireland, particularly by targeting the riskier borrowers. Their experience reveals that learning and fine-tuning of LTV policies along the way are inevitable.</p>","PeriodicalId":51374,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Surveys","volume":"38 1","pages":"232-267"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joes.12548","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loan-to-value limits as a macroprudential policy tool: Developments in theory and practice\",\"authors\":\"William Gatt\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joes.12548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>I analyze the development of the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio limit for households as a macroprudential policy tool in both theory and practice, by surveying theoretical and empirical literature. I argue that the practical implementation of LTV caps preceded theoretical studies, but research has caught up since the global financial crisis, including research on which indicators seem to work best in flagging a potential future crisis. In practice, LTV ratio limits tend to be effective tools in buffering credit and house price growth, although attributing casual effects in empirical studies is not always straightforward. The benefits of LTV policy seem to outweigh some potential side-effects, such as the output costs of tightening credit. I then survey the recent success with LTV policy in New Zealand and Ireland, particularly by targeting the riskier borrowers. Their experience reveals that learning and fine-tuning of LTV policies along the way are inevitable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Surveys\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"232-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joes.12548\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Surveys\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joes.12548\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Surveys","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joes.12548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我通过对理论和实证文献的调查,分析了作为宏观审慎政策工具的家庭贷款价值比(LTV)限制在理论和实践中的发展。我认为,LTV 上限的实际实施先于理论研究,但自全球金融危机以来,研究已经跟上了步伐,包括研究哪些指标似乎最能警示潜在的未来危机。在实践中,LTV 比率限制往往是缓冲信贷和房价增长的有效工具,尽管在实证研究中归因于偶然效应并不总是那么简单。按揭成数限制政策的好处似乎超过了一些潜在的副作用,如收紧信贷的产出成本。然后,我考察了新西兰和爱尔兰最近在最低贷款成数政策方面取得的成功,尤其是针对风险较高的借款人的政策。它们的经验表明,在实践中学习和微调最低贷款成数政策是不可避免的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Loan-to-value limits as a macroprudential policy tool: Developments in theory and practice

Loan-to-value limits as a macroprudential policy tool: Developments in theory and practice

I analyze the development of the loan-to-value (LTV) ratio limit for households as a macroprudential policy tool in both theory and practice, by surveying theoretical and empirical literature. I argue that the practical implementation of LTV caps preceded theoretical studies, but research has caught up since the global financial crisis, including research on which indicators seem to work best in flagging a potential future crisis. In practice, LTV ratio limits tend to be effective tools in buffering credit and house price growth, although attributing casual effects in empirical studies is not always straightforward. The benefits of LTV policy seem to outweigh some potential side-effects, such as the output costs of tightening credit. I then survey the recent success with LTV policy in New Zealand and Ireland, particularly by targeting the riskier borrowers. Their experience reveals that learning and fine-tuning of LTV policies along the way are inevitable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: As economics becomes increasingly specialized, communication amongst economists becomes even more important. The Journal of Economic Surveys seeks to improve the communication of new ideas. It provides a means by which economists can keep abreast of recent developments beyond their immediate specialization. Areas covered include: - economics - econometrics - economic history - business economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信