使用机器学习识别原始和加工的动物纤维

Oliver Rippel, Niclas Bilitewski, K. Rahimi, Juliana Kurniadi, A. Herrmann, D. Merhof
{"title":"使用机器学习识别原始和加工的动物纤维","authors":"Oliver Rippel, Niclas Bilitewski, K. Rahimi, Juliana Kurniadi, A. Herrmann, D. Merhof","doi":"10.1109/I2MTC50364.2021.9460000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Animal fiber identification is a crucial aspect of fabric production, as specialty fibers such as cashmere are often targeted by adulteration attempts. Since animal fiber identification is difficult, it is currently performed by human experts using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Many algorithms have been proposed to tackle the automated identification of animal and specialty fibers in SEM images. While ever-increasing classification performance is reported, the adulteration resistance of the proposed methods has not yet been evaluated. In our work, we perform such an evaluation for the first time. Lacking known ground truth adulterations, we construct a dataset containing specialty as well as conventional animal fibers in a chemically treated and untreated setting, where treated and untreated state differ slightly. We subsequently benchmark the ability of proposed state-of-the-art methods to correctly identify animal fibers including treatment status as a surrogate for adulteration resistance. Our results reveal that not all methods are equally capable at distinguishing treated and untreated fibers. Therefore, future research on animal fiber identification should additionally focus on adulteration resistance.","PeriodicalId":6772,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC)","volume":"2004 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Pristine and Processed Animal Fibers using Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Rippel, Niclas Bilitewski, K. Rahimi, Juliana Kurniadi, A. Herrmann, D. Merhof\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/I2MTC50364.2021.9460000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Animal fiber identification is a crucial aspect of fabric production, as specialty fibers such as cashmere are often targeted by adulteration attempts. Since animal fiber identification is difficult, it is currently performed by human experts using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Many algorithms have been proposed to tackle the automated identification of animal and specialty fibers in SEM images. While ever-increasing classification performance is reported, the adulteration resistance of the proposed methods has not yet been evaluated. In our work, we perform such an evaluation for the first time. Lacking known ground truth adulterations, we construct a dataset containing specialty as well as conventional animal fibers in a chemically treated and untreated setting, where treated and untreated state differ slightly. We subsequently benchmark the ability of proposed state-of-the-art methods to correctly identify animal fibers including treatment status as a surrogate for adulteration resistance. Our results reveal that not all methods are equally capable at distinguishing treated and untreated fibers. Therefore, future research on animal fiber identification should additionally focus on adulteration resistance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC)\",\"volume\":\"2004 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC50364.2021.9460000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/I2MTC50364.2021.9460000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

动物纤维鉴定是织物生产的一个关键方面,因为羊绒等特种纤维经常成为掺假企图的目标。由于动物纤维鉴定困难,目前由人类专家使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)进行。已经提出了许多算法来解决扫描电镜图像中动物纤维和特种纤维的自动识别问题。虽然越来越多的分类性能被报道,但所提出的方法的抗掺假性尚未得到评估。在我们的工作中,我们第一次执行这样的评估。由于缺乏已知的真实掺假,我们在化学处理和未经处理的环境中构建了一个包含特殊和传统动物纤维的数据集,其中处理和未经处理的状态略有不同。随后,我们对所提出的最先进的方法进行基准测试,以正确识别动物纤维,包括作为掺假抗性替代的处理状态。我们的结果表明,并不是所有的方法都能同样地区分处理过的和未处理过的纤维。因此,未来对动物纤维鉴定的研究应进一步关注抗掺假性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Pristine and Processed Animal Fibers using Machine Learning
Animal fiber identification is a crucial aspect of fabric production, as specialty fibers such as cashmere are often targeted by adulteration attempts. Since animal fiber identification is difficult, it is currently performed by human experts using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Many algorithms have been proposed to tackle the automated identification of animal and specialty fibers in SEM images. While ever-increasing classification performance is reported, the adulteration resistance of the proposed methods has not yet been evaluated. In our work, we perform such an evaluation for the first time. Lacking known ground truth adulterations, we construct a dataset containing specialty as well as conventional animal fibers in a chemically treated and untreated setting, where treated and untreated state differ slightly. We subsequently benchmark the ability of proposed state-of-the-art methods to correctly identify animal fibers including treatment status as a surrogate for adulteration resistance. Our results reveal that not all methods are equally capable at distinguishing treated and untreated fibers. Therefore, future research on animal fiber identification should additionally focus on adulteration resistance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信