大型企业中漏洞管理的最佳实践:对通用漏洞评分系统的批判观点

Jaqueline Hans, R. Brandtweiner
{"title":"大型企业中漏洞管理的最佳实践:对通用漏洞评分系统的批判观点","authors":"Jaqueline Hans, R. Brandtweiner","doi":"10.2495/ssr220101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past decade, enterprises have been increasingly suffering from attacks conducted by cybercriminals. Potential losses are not only reflected on their revenue or stolen data, but also on their damaged reputation. Most often, these attacks were possible due to the successful exploitation of vulnerabilities within the company’s system. Many of such attacks could have been mitigated, if responsible actors took the right actions related to the management of such vulnerabilities. This paper aims to summarize good practices regarding vulnerability management, with essential focus on the matter of prioritization. For this, several vulnerability scoring systems such as the Common Vulnerability Scoring System were analyzed according to the way they are portrayed in scientific literature. It will also analyze non-technical, human factors as well by reflecting on organizational aspects. The aim is to provide an overview about the options large enterprises have in this regard and to inform about potential consequences they could face. It will also reflect on the problematic behind the trade-off between investing enough in a cybersecurity foundation, while simultaneously remaining profitable.","PeriodicalId":23773,"journal":{"name":"WIT Transactions on the Built Environment","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BEST PRACTICES FOR VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT IN LARGE ENTERPRISES: A CRITICAL VIEW ON THE COMMON VULNERABILITY SCORING SYSTEM\",\"authors\":\"Jaqueline Hans, R. Brandtweiner\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/ssr220101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the past decade, enterprises have been increasingly suffering from attacks conducted by cybercriminals. Potential losses are not only reflected on their revenue or stolen data, but also on their damaged reputation. Most often, these attacks were possible due to the successful exploitation of vulnerabilities within the company’s system. Many of such attacks could have been mitigated, if responsible actors took the right actions related to the management of such vulnerabilities. This paper aims to summarize good practices regarding vulnerability management, with essential focus on the matter of prioritization. For this, several vulnerability scoring systems such as the Common Vulnerability Scoring System were analyzed according to the way they are portrayed in scientific literature. It will also analyze non-technical, human factors as well by reflecting on organizational aspects. The aim is to provide an overview about the options large enterprises have in this regard and to inform about potential consequences they could face. It will also reflect on the problematic behind the trade-off between investing enough in a cybersecurity foundation, while simultaneously remaining profitable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WIT Transactions on the Built Environment\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WIT Transactions on the Built Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/ssr220101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIT Transactions on the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/ssr220101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的十年中,企业越来越多地遭受网络犯罪分子的攻击。潜在的损失不仅体现在他们的收入或数据被盗上,还体现在他们的声誉受损上。大多数情况下,这些攻击是由于成功利用了公司系统中的漏洞而成为可能的。如果负责任的参与者采取与此类漏洞管理相关的正确行动,许多此类攻击本可以得到缓解。本文旨在总结有关漏洞管理的良好实践,重点放在优先级问题上。为此,根据科学文献中描述的方式,分析了几种漏洞评分系统,如Common vulnerability scoring System。它还将通过反映组织方面来分析非技术的、人为的因素。其目的是概述大型企业在这方面的选择,并告知它们可能面临的潜在后果。它还将反映出在网络安全基础上投入足够资金与同时保持盈利之间权衡背后的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
BEST PRACTICES FOR VULNERABILITY MANAGEMENT IN LARGE ENTERPRISES: A CRITICAL VIEW ON THE COMMON VULNERABILITY SCORING SYSTEM
Over the past decade, enterprises have been increasingly suffering from attacks conducted by cybercriminals. Potential losses are not only reflected on their revenue or stolen data, but also on their damaged reputation. Most often, these attacks were possible due to the successful exploitation of vulnerabilities within the company’s system. Many of such attacks could have been mitigated, if responsible actors took the right actions related to the management of such vulnerabilities. This paper aims to summarize good practices regarding vulnerability management, with essential focus on the matter of prioritization. For this, several vulnerability scoring systems such as the Common Vulnerability Scoring System were analyzed according to the way they are portrayed in scientific literature. It will also analyze non-technical, human factors as well by reflecting on organizational aspects. The aim is to provide an overview about the options large enterprises have in this regard and to inform about potential consequences they could face. It will also reflect on the problematic behind the trade-off between investing enough in a cybersecurity foundation, while simultaneously remaining profitable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信