废除圆满:需要在婚姻中去本质化性

Diksha Sanyal, Arijeet Ghosh
{"title":"废除圆满:需要在婚姻中去本质化性","authors":"Diksha Sanyal, Arijeet Ghosh","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2022.2074708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article critiques the centrality of heteronormative sex and “functional” bodies within marriage by analysing provisions on non-consummation andfault-based grounds of divorce, in codified personal laws. Such provisions, arguably, allows judges to construct marriage as an institution entrenched in heterosexual performatives. When heterosexual intercourse is construed as an obligation it leads to three problems. First, courts use such provisions to direct parties to undergo humiliating gender and impotency tests Second, it blurs the distinction between marital rape and marital sexuality. Finally, such provisions present a challenge to the recognition of non-normative,marriages as well, if they come to be recognized in India. Given this, we argue for de-essentialising of sex within marriage through the removal of consummation as a ground of annulment and more broadly, for the introduction of a no-fault regime of divorce. Reliance is placed on recent developments in the arena of privacy jurisprudence in India.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abolishing consummation: the need to de-essentialise sex within marriage\",\"authors\":\"Diksha Sanyal, Arijeet Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/24730580.2022.2074708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article critiques the centrality of heteronormative sex and “functional” bodies within marriage by analysing provisions on non-consummation andfault-based grounds of divorce, in codified personal laws. Such provisions, arguably, allows judges to construct marriage as an institution entrenched in heterosexual performatives. When heterosexual intercourse is construed as an obligation it leads to three problems. First, courts use such provisions to direct parties to undergo humiliating gender and impotency tests Second, it blurs the distinction between marital rape and marital sexuality. Finally, such provisions present a challenge to the recognition of non-normative,marriages as well, if they come to be recognized in India. Given this, we argue for de-essentialising of sex within marriage through the removal of consummation as a ground of annulment and more broadly, for the introduction of a no-fault regime of divorce. Reliance is placed on recent developments in the arena of privacy jurisprudence in India.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2022.2074708\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2022.2074708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文通过分析成文法中关于非完婚和基于过错的离婚理由的规定,批评了异性恋性和“功能性”身体在婚姻中的中心地位。可以说,这样的规定允许法官将婚姻构建为一种根深蒂固的异性恋行为。当异性性交被解释为一种义务时,它会导致三个问题。首先,法院利用这些条款指示当事人接受侮辱性的性别和阳痿检查。其次,它模糊了婚内强奸和婚内性行为之间的区别。最后,如果非规范性婚姻在印度得到承认,这些规定也对承认它们提出了挑战。鉴于此,我们主张通过取消圆满作为婚姻无效的理由,更广泛地说,引入无过错离婚制度,从而使婚姻中的性行为去本质化。印度隐私法理学领域的最新发展是值得信赖的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abolishing consummation: the need to de-essentialise sex within marriage
ABSTRACT This article critiques the centrality of heteronormative sex and “functional” bodies within marriage by analysing provisions on non-consummation andfault-based grounds of divorce, in codified personal laws. Such provisions, arguably, allows judges to construct marriage as an institution entrenched in heterosexual performatives. When heterosexual intercourse is construed as an obligation it leads to three problems. First, courts use such provisions to direct parties to undergo humiliating gender and impotency tests Second, it blurs the distinction between marital rape and marital sexuality. Finally, such provisions present a challenge to the recognition of non-normative,marriages as well, if they come to be recognized in India. Given this, we argue for de-essentialising of sex within marriage through the removal of consummation as a ground of annulment and more broadly, for the introduction of a no-fault regime of divorce. Reliance is placed on recent developments in the arena of privacy jurisprudence in India.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信