《国际法与发展》的根本转变?公司、资本主义国家和帝国统治

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Radha D’Souza
{"title":"《国际法与发展》的根本转变?公司、资本主义国家和帝国统治","authors":"Radha D’Souza","doi":"10.1080/02255189.2022.2027232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article describes how the liberal orthodoxy informing the field known as ‘Law and Development’ (L&D), as a field of knowledge, obscures contemporary imperial and neo-colonial governance practices. Through the metaphor of the disciplinary ‘picket fence’, and engagement with three nodes of tension from colonial governance reproduced today, it reveals L&D’s limited and partial production of knowledge on governance exercised by two key actors – transnational corporations and capitalist states. This article argues for a new, more explicitly critical, trajectory of research that foregrounds the corporation-nation governance nexus within a more radical International Law & Development (ILD) field of research.","PeriodicalId":46832,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Development Studies-Revue Canadienne D Etudes Du Developpement","volume":"158 1","pages":"20 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A radical turn in International Law and Development? Corporations, capitalist states and imperial governance\",\"authors\":\"Radha D’Souza\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02255189.2022.2027232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article describes how the liberal orthodoxy informing the field known as ‘Law and Development’ (L&D), as a field of knowledge, obscures contemporary imperial and neo-colonial governance practices. Through the metaphor of the disciplinary ‘picket fence’, and engagement with three nodes of tension from colonial governance reproduced today, it reveals L&D’s limited and partial production of knowledge on governance exercised by two key actors – transnational corporations and capitalist states. This article argues for a new, more explicitly critical, trajectory of research that foregrounds the corporation-nation governance nexus within a more radical International Law & Development (ILD) field of research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46832,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Development Studies-Revue Canadienne D Etudes Du Developpement\",\"volume\":\"158 1\",\"pages\":\"20 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Development Studies-Revue Canadienne D Etudes Du Developpement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2022.2027232\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Development Studies-Revue Canadienne D Etudes Du Developpement","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2022.2027232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文描述了自由主义的正统观念如何将“法律与发展”(L&D)领域作为一个知识领域,掩盖了当代帝国主义和新殖民主义的治理实践。通过学科“尖桩篱笆”的隐喻,以及与今天复制的殖民治理的三个紧张节点的接触,它揭示了L&D对两个关键角色-跨国公司和资本主义国家-行使的治理知识的有限和部分生产。本文主张一种新的、更明确的批判性研究轨迹,将公司-国家治理关系置于更激进的国际法与发展(ILD)研究领域中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A radical turn in International Law and Development? Corporations, capitalist states and imperial governance
ABSTRACT This article describes how the liberal orthodoxy informing the field known as ‘Law and Development’ (L&D), as a field of knowledge, obscures contemporary imperial and neo-colonial governance practices. Through the metaphor of the disciplinary ‘picket fence’, and engagement with three nodes of tension from colonial governance reproduced today, it reveals L&D’s limited and partial production of knowledge on governance exercised by two key actors – transnational corporations and capitalist states. This article argues for a new, more explicitly critical, trajectory of research that foregrounds the corporation-nation governance nexus within a more radical International Law & Development (ILD) field of research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Since 1980, the Canadian Journal of Development Studies has been an interdisciplinary, bilingual forum where scholars, practitioners, and policy-makers explore and exchange ideas on both conventional and alternative approaches to development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信