语法划分和模块化确定性解析1

Stefano Crespi Reghizzi, Giuseppe Psaila
{"title":"语法划分和模块化确定性解析1","authors":"Stefano Crespi Reghizzi,&nbsp;Giuseppe Psaila","doi":"10.1016/S0096-0551(98)00012-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Complex languages are often modularized into sublanguages and the compiler is accordingly organized as a set of separate modules. Modularization (called <em>federalization</em>) is beneficial for beating complexity, for maintenance, and for reuse. Focusing on syntax analysis, we consider the decomposition of a grammar into deterministic subgrammars. We study three conditions for determinism in grammar partitioning: first using homogeneous modules of the LR(1) or LL(1) kind; then using heterogeneous modules (LR(1) or LL(1)). Federalization slightly decreases the generality of LR(1) parsers, but not of LL(1) ones, and it allows to handle some grammars which are not LALR(1). Experimental results show that LR(1) federal automata have fewer (up to 60%) states than monolithic LR(1) automata. Criteria for modularization, practical experiences and hints to semantic decomposition issues conclude the paper.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100315,"journal":{"name":"Computer Languages","volume":"24 4","pages":"Pages 197-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0096-0551(98)00012-5","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grammar partitioning and modular deterministic parsing1\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Crespi Reghizzi,&nbsp;Giuseppe Psaila\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0096-0551(98)00012-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Complex languages are often modularized into sublanguages and the compiler is accordingly organized as a set of separate modules. Modularization (called <em>federalization</em>) is beneficial for beating complexity, for maintenance, and for reuse. Focusing on syntax analysis, we consider the decomposition of a grammar into deterministic subgrammars. We study three conditions for determinism in grammar partitioning: first using homogeneous modules of the LR(1) or LL(1) kind; then using heterogeneous modules (LR(1) or LL(1)). Federalization slightly decreases the generality of LR(1) parsers, but not of LL(1) ones, and it allows to handle some grammars which are not LALR(1). Experimental results show that LR(1) federal automata have fewer (up to 60%) states than monolithic LR(1) automata. Criteria for modularization, practical experiences and hints to semantic decomposition issues conclude the paper.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Languages\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 197-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0096-0551(98)00012-5\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Languages\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096055198000125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096055198000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

复杂的语言通常被模块化成子语言,编译器相应地被组织成一组独立的模块。模块化(称为联邦化)有利于降低复杂性、维护和重用。在语法分析方面,我们考虑将语法分解为确定性子语法。我们研究了语法划分的三种决定论条件:首先使用LR(1)或LL(1)类同构模块;然后使用异构模块(LR(1)或LL(1))。联邦化稍微降低了LR(1)解析器的通用性,但不会降低LL(1)解析器的通用性,并且它允许处理一些非LALR(1)的语法。实验结果表明,LR(1)联邦自动机比单片LR(1)自动机具有更少的状态(高达60%)。本文总结了模块化的标准、实践经验和语义分解问题的提示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Grammar partitioning and modular deterministic parsing1

Complex languages are often modularized into sublanguages and the compiler is accordingly organized as a set of separate modules. Modularization (called federalization) is beneficial for beating complexity, for maintenance, and for reuse. Focusing on syntax analysis, we consider the decomposition of a grammar into deterministic subgrammars. We study three conditions for determinism in grammar partitioning: first using homogeneous modules of the LR(1) or LL(1) kind; then using heterogeneous modules (LR(1) or LL(1)). Federalization slightly decreases the generality of LR(1) parsers, but not of LL(1) ones, and it allows to handle some grammars which are not LALR(1). Experimental results show that LR(1) federal automata have fewer (up to 60%) states than monolithic LR(1) automata. Criteria for modularization, practical experiences and hints to semantic decomposition issues conclude the paper.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信