分配主义的哲学基础:天主教社会训导与辅助原则

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Lu
{"title":"分配主义的哲学基础:天主教社会训导与辅助原则","authors":"M. Lu","doi":"10.5840/QD20178110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is sometimes difficult to nail down exactly what Distributism is (or entails) as a social and political theory. Nonetheless, it is widely accepted that Distributism is an attempt to develop and apply the Catholic Social Teaching (CST) that began evolving seriously in the nineteenth century through the teaching of Leo XIII and his successors. For instance, in his book Toward a Truly Free Market, John Médaille summarizes his Distributist understanding of the principles of government: “Against the clash of special interests, we assert ‘The Principle of The Common Good’; against the centralizing tendency, we assert ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity’; against the tendency to favor the rich and powerful, we assert ‘The Principle of Solidarity’ ” (ch. 13).1 It seems clear that these three principles— the common good, subsidiarity, and solidarity— must be central to the philosophical foundations of any developed Distributist theory.2 Though they are all deeply interrelated and cannot be properly understood apart from one another, in this article, I want to focus on subsidiarity in particular. Without discounting the others, I think subsidiarity is of particular philosophical interest, not least because it has taken on a life of its own in political theorizing outside of Catholic teaching— for instance, in the debates about the structure of the European Union. Even so, to properly understand subsidiarity requires seeing how it developed in the context of CST, which is its true home.3","PeriodicalId":40384,"journal":{"name":"Quaestiones Disputatae","volume":"16 1","pages":"20 - 7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Philosophical Foundations of Distributism: Catholic Social Teaching and the Principle of Subsidiarity\",\"authors\":\"M. Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/QD20178110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is sometimes difficult to nail down exactly what Distributism is (or entails) as a social and political theory. Nonetheless, it is widely accepted that Distributism is an attempt to develop and apply the Catholic Social Teaching (CST) that began evolving seriously in the nineteenth century through the teaching of Leo XIII and his successors. For instance, in his book Toward a Truly Free Market, John Médaille summarizes his Distributist understanding of the principles of government: “Against the clash of special interests, we assert ‘The Principle of The Common Good’; against the centralizing tendency, we assert ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity’; against the tendency to favor the rich and powerful, we assert ‘The Principle of Solidarity’ ” (ch. 13).1 It seems clear that these three principles— the common good, subsidiarity, and solidarity— must be central to the philosophical foundations of any developed Distributist theory.2 Though they are all deeply interrelated and cannot be properly understood apart from one another, in this article, I want to focus on subsidiarity in particular. Without discounting the others, I think subsidiarity is of particular philosophical interest, not least because it has taken on a life of its own in political theorizing outside of Catholic teaching— for instance, in the debates about the structure of the European Union. Even so, to properly understand subsidiarity requires seeing how it developed in the context of CST, which is its true home.3\",\"PeriodicalId\":40384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaestiones Disputatae\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"20 - 7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaestiones Disputatae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD20178110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaestiones Disputatae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/QD20178110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

有时很难确切地确定分配主义作为一种社会和政治理论是什么(或需要什么)。尽管如此,人们普遍认为,分配论是一种发展和应用天主教社会教学(CST)的尝试,该教学在19世纪通过利奥十三世及其继任者的教学开始严重演变。例如,在他的《走向真正的自由市场》一书中,约翰·姆萨达耶总结了他的分配主义者对政府原则的理解:“为了反对特殊利益的冲突,我们主张‘共同利益原则’;针对集中化倾向,我们主张“辅助性原则”;为了反对偏袒富人和有权有势的倾向,我们主张‘团结原则’”(第13章)很明显,这三个原则——共同利益、辅助性和团结性——必须成为任何发达的分配主义理论的哲学基础的中心虽然它们都是密切相关的,不能分开来正确理解,但在本文中,我想特别关注辅助性。在不贬低其他观点的情况下,我认为辅助性具有特别的哲学意义,尤其是因为它在天主教教义之外的政治理论中有了自己的生命——例如,在关于欧盟结构的辩论中。即便如此,要正确理解辅助性,需要看到它是如何在CST的背景下发展起来的,这是它真正的家园
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Philosophical Foundations of Distributism: Catholic Social Teaching and the Principle of Subsidiarity
It is sometimes difficult to nail down exactly what Distributism is (or entails) as a social and political theory. Nonetheless, it is widely accepted that Distributism is an attempt to develop and apply the Catholic Social Teaching (CST) that began evolving seriously in the nineteenth century through the teaching of Leo XIII and his successors. For instance, in his book Toward a Truly Free Market, John Médaille summarizes his Distributist understanding of the principles of government: “Against the clash of special interests, we assert ‘The Principle of The Common Good’; against the centralizing tendency, we assert ‘The Principle of Subsidiarity’; against the tendency to favor the rich and powerful, we assert ‘The Principle of Solidarity’ ” (ch. 13).1 It seems clear that these three principles— the common good, subsidiarity, and solidarity— must be central to the philosophical foundations of any developed Distributist theory.2 Though they are all deeply interrelated and cannot be properly understood apart from one another, in this article, I want to focus on subsidiarity in particular. Without discounting the others, I think subsidiarity is of particular philosophical interest, not least because it has taken on a life of its own in political theorizing outside of Catholic teaching— for instance, in the debates about the structure of the European Union. Even so, to properly understand subsidiarity requires seeing how it developed in the context of CST, which is its true home.3
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quaestiones Disputatae
Quaestiones Disputatae HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信