社会取向问题是否掩盖了种族偏见?公众反对移民来源的实验证据

Omer Solodoch
{"title":"社会取向问题是否掩盖了种族偏见?公众反对移民来源的实验证据","authors":"Omer Solodoch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3283038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Civic (\"sociotropic\") concerns are a main source of public opposition to immigration. Yet whether such concerns stem from ethnic biases remains contested because research consistently focuses on native attitudes toward outgroup members. This lack of variation in intergroup relations limits causal inferences regarding the sources of sociotropic concerns. The present experiment asks both natives and immigrants of various origins to evaluate randomly assigned profiles of visa applicants to the Netherlands. Crucially, the experiment assigns an \"ingroup treatment\"--assessing applications of individuals from the same ethno-cultural background as the respondent. The findings show that sociotropic concerns are shared by both natives and immigrants and are not biased towards co-ethnic immigrants. This suggests that sociotropic opposition to immigration reflects a form of civic nationalism, rather than nativism or ethnocentric dispositions.","PeriodicalId":81320,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown immigration law journal","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Sociotropic Concerns Mask Ethnic Biases? Experimental Evidence on the Sources of Public Opposition to Immigration\",\"authors\":\"Omer Solodoch\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3283038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Civic (\\\"sociotropic\\\") concerns are a main source of public opposition to immigration. Yet whether such concerns stem from ethnic biases remains contested because research consistently focuses on native attitudes toward outgroup members. This lack of variation in intergroup relations limits causal inferences regarding the sources of sociotropic concerns. The present experiment asks both natives and immigrants of various origins to evaluate randomly assigned profiles of visa applicants to the Netherlands. Crucially, the experiment assigns an \\\"ingroup treatment\\\"--assessing applications of individuals from the same ethno-cultural background as the respondent. The findings show that sociotropic concerns are shared by both natives and immigrants and are not biased towards co-ethnic immigrants. This suggests that sociotropic opposition to immigration reflects a form of civic nationalism, rather than nativism or ethnocentric dispositions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgetown immigration law journal\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgetown immigration law journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3283038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown immigration law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3283038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公民(“社会取向”)的担忧是公众反对移民的主要原因。然而,这种担忧是否源于种族偏见仍然存在争议,因为研究一直关注的是当地人对群体外成员的态度。群体间关系缺乏变化限制了对社会向性关注来源的因果推断。本实验要求来自不同国家的本地人和移民对随机分配的荷兰签证申请人进行评估。至关重要的是,该实验分配了一种“内群体处理”——评估与被调查者具有相同种族文化背景的个人的申请。研究结果表明,当地人和移民都有社会取向问题,并且对同种族移民没有偏见。这表明,反对移民的社会取向反映了一种公民民族主义,而不是本土主义或种族中心主义倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Sociotropic Concerns Mask Ethnic Biases? Experimental Evidence on the Sources of Public Opposition to Immigration
Civic ("sociotropic") concerns are a main source of public opposition to immigration. Yet whether such concerns stem from ethnic biases remains contested because research consistently focuses on native attitudes toward outgroup members. This lack of variation in intergroup relations limits causal inferences regarding the sources of sociotropic concerns. The present experiment asks both natives and immigrants of various origins to evaluate randomly assigned profiles of visa applicants to the Netherlands. Crucially, the experiment assigns an "ingroup treatment"--assessing applications of individuals from the same ethno-cultural background as the respondent. The findings show that sociotropic concerns are shared by both natives and immigrants and are not biased towards co-ethnic immigrants. This suggests that sociotropic opposition to immigration reflects a form of civic nationalism, rather than nativism or ethnocentric dispositions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信