使用Talking Stick方法和学习习惯对X MAN 3镇经济学生学习结果的影响

Willy Septiani Putri, S. Wahyuni, Jimi Ronald
{"title":"使用Talking Stick方法和学习习惯对X MAN 3镇经济学生学习结果的影响","authors":"Willy Septiani Putri, S. Wahyuni, Jimi Ronald","doi":"10.22202/horizon.v2i4.5946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the Influence of the Use of Talking Stick Methods and Study Habits on the Economic Learning Outcomes of Class X Students in MAN 3 Padang City. Based on the analysis of data it is known that both classes of samples are usually distributed and homogeneous. The results of the hypothesis test through two way ANOVA results are as follows: 1) The first hypothesis obtained a sig value of 0.000, this means that the sig value. less than the value (a= 0.05 (sig.<(a) then thus the H0 accepted Ha rejected, so it can be concluded that the learning outcomes of students taught using the talking stick method are higher than those taught using conventional learning methods (discovery learning). 2) the second hypothesis, obtained the value of the sig. 0.000, this means that the value of the sig. less than the value (a = 0.05 (sig.< (a) then thus H0 accepted Ha rejected, so it can be concluded that students who have good study habits have high learning outcomes than the learning outcomes of students who have poor study habits. 3) the third hypothesis, obtained the value of the sig level. = 0.401, this means that the value of sig. is greater than the value (a = 0.05 (sig. < (a) then thus the H0 rejected Ha accepted, so that there is no interaction of learning models  talking sticks and study habits towards student learning outcomes.","PeriodicalId":81462,"journal":{"name":"Horizon : a magazine of the arts","volume":"40 5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pengaruh Penggunaan Metode Talking Stick Dan Kebiasaan Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas X MAN 3 Kota Padang\",\"authors\":\"Willy Septiani Putri, S. Wahyuni, Jimi Ronald\",\"doi\":\"10.22202/horizon.v2i4.5946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to analyze the Influence of the Use of Talking Stick Methods and Study Habits on the Economic Learning Outcomes of Class X Students in MAN 3 Padang City. Based on the analysis of data it is known that both classes of samples are usually distributed and homogeneous. The results of the hypothesis test through two way ANOVA results are as follows: 1) The first hypothesis obtained a sig value of 0.000, this means that the sig value. less than the value (a= 0.05 (sig.<(a) then thus the H0 accepted Ha rejected, so it can be concluded that the learning outcomes of students taught using the talking stick method are higher than those taught using conventional learning methods (discovery learning). 2) the second hypothesis, obtained the value of the sig. 0.000, this means that the value of the sig. less than the value (a = 0.05 (sig.< (a) then thus H0 accepted Ha rejected, so it can be concluded that students who have good study habits have high learning outcomes than the learning outcomes of students who have poor study habits. 3) the third hypothesis, obtained the value of the sig level. = 0.401, this means that the value of sig. is greater than the value (a = 0.05 (sig. < (a) then thus the H0 rejected Ha accepted, so that there is no interaction of learning models  talking sticks and study habits towards student learning outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Horizon : a magazine of the arts\",\"volume\":\"40 5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Horizon : a magazine of the arts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22202/horizon.v2i4.5946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Horizon : a magazine of the arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22202/horizon.v2i4.5946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析巴东市曼3中学X班学生使用说话棒方法和学习习惯对经济学习成果的影响。根据对数据的分析,我们知道这两类样本通常是分布的和均匀的。通过双向方差分析的假设检验结果如下:1)第一个假设得到的sig值为0.000,这意味着sig值。小于值(a= 0.05 (sig.<(a)),则H0接受了Ha拒绝,因此可以得出结论,使用手杖法教学的学生的学习成果高于使用传统学习方法(发现学习)的学生。2)第二个假设,得到了sig. 0.000的值,这意味着sig.的值小于值(a = 0.05) (sig.< (a))那么H0接受了Ha拒绝了,因此可以得出结论,学习习惯好的学生的学习成果比学习习惯差的学生的学习成果高。3)第三个假设,得到了sig水平的值。= 0.401,这意味着sig.的值大于(a = 0.05)的值(sig. < (a)),那么H0拒绝了Ha接受了,因此学习模式、说话棒和学习习惯对学生的学习成果没有交互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pengaruh Penggunaan Metode Talking Stick Dan Kebiasaan Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas X MAN 3 Kota Padang
This study aims to analyze the Influence of the Use of Talking Stick Methods and Study Habits on the Economic Learning Outcomes of Class X Students in MAN 3 Padang City. Based on the analysis of data it is known that both classes of samples are usually distributed and homogeneous. The results of the hypothesis test through two way ANOVA results are as follows: 1) The first hypothesis obtained a sig value of 0.000, this means that the sig value. less than the value (a= 0.05 (sig.<(a) then thus the H0 accepted Ha rejected, so it can be concluded that the learning outcomes of students taught using the talking stick method are higher than those taught using conventional learning methods (discovery learning). 2) the second hypothesis, obtained the value of the sig. 0.000, this means that the value of the sig. less than the value (a = 0.05 (sig.< (a) then thus H0 accepted Ha rejected, so it can be concluded that students who have good study habits have high learning outcomes than the learning outcomes of students who have poor study habits. 3) the third hypothesis, obtained the value of the sig level. = 0.401, this means that the value of sig. is greater than the value (a = 0.05 (sig. < (a) then thus the H0 rejected Ha accepted, so that there is no interaction of learning models  talking sticks and study habits towards student learning outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信