{"title":"Pro Calatoria Themide","authors":"Mariko Igimi","doi":"10.1515/zrgr-2023-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Pro Calatoria Themide. Iusta Case and the Living Conditions of Freed Slaves. The Iusta Case has always been understood as a dispute in which Iusta was claiming her freeborn status (ingenua). Under this conception, however, some unsolved mysteries remain. The author tries to reconstruct the case from the perspective that Iusta was claiming to be a beneficiary of the fideicommissio of Stephanus as one of his freed slaves, by drawing a parallel with D. 34,16,1. Based on this understanding, the documents found in Casa del Bicentenario are, in accordance with Themis’ defence strategy, all in support of Stephanus’ widow who refused to pay the maintenance of the young Iusta for the rest of her life.","PeriodicalId":23880,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung","volume":"43 1","pages":"324 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte. Romanistische Abteilung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zrgr-2023-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
热疗主题。尤斯塔案和被释放奴隶的生活条件。尤斯塔案一直被理解为尤斯塔主张她的自由身份(ingenua)的争端。然而,在这个概念下,仍然存在一些未解之谜。作者试图从尤斯塔声称自己是斯蒂芬努斯作为他的自由奴隶之一的忠诚委托的受益者的角度来重建这个案例,通过与D. 34,16,1进行类比。基于这一理解,根据忒弥斯的辩护策略,在Casa del Bicentenario发现的文件都支持Stephanus的遗孀,她拒绝为年轻的Iusta支付余生的赡养费。
Summary Pro Calatoria Themide. Iusta Case and the Living Conditions of Freed Slaves. The Iusta Case has always been understood as a dispute in which Iusta was claiming her freeborn status (ingenua). Under this conception, however, some unsolved mysteries remain. The author tries to reconstruct the case from the perspective that Iusta was claiming to be a beneficiary of the fideicommissio of Stephanus as one of his freed slaves, by drawing a parallel with D. 34,16,1. Based on this understanding, the documents found in Casa del Bicentenario are, in accordance with Themis’ defence strategy, all in support of Stephanus’ widow who refused to pay the maintenance of the young Iusta for the rest of her life.