{"title":"为什么我们的阅读方式胜过我们的阅读内容","authors":"G. Graff","doi":"10.1632/PROF.2009.2009.1.66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assumption that the quality of the texts we assign determines the educational value of studying those texts seems so self-evident as to be beyond question. It seems obvious that the higher the quality of a text, the more educationally rewarding reading it will be. The most influen tial modern statement of this view is Matthew Arnold's 1888 essay \"The Study of Poetry,\" in which Arnold argued that with the waning of popular religious faith, poetry had to step in and assume the burden of provid ing spiritual comfort and meaning to an emerging mass democratic so ciety. But Arnold stresses that for poetry to fulfill this new responsibil ity, only poetry of the highest literary quality would suffice. As Arnold puts it, we must \"set our standard for poetry high, since poetry, to be ca pable of fulfilling such high destinies, must be poetry of a high order of","PeriodicalId":86631,"journal":{"name":"The Osteopathic profession","volume":"197 1","pages":"66-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why How We Read Trumps What We Read\",\"authors\":\"G. Graff\",\"doi\":\"10.1632/PROF.2009.2009.1.66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The assumption that the quality of the texts we assign determines the educational value of studying those texts seems so self-evident as to be beyond question. It seems obvious that the higher the quality of a text, the more educationally rewarding reading it will be. The most influen tial modern statement of this view is Matthew Arnold's 1888 essay \\\"The Study of Poetry,\\\" in which Arnold argued that with the waning of popular religious faith, poetry had to step in and assume the burden of provid ing spiritual comfort and meaning to an emerging mass democratic so ciety. But Arnold stresses that for poetry to fulfill this new responsibil ity, only poetry of the highest literary quality would suffice. As Arnold puts it, we must \\\"set our standard for poetry high, since poetry, to be ca pable of fulfilling such high destinies, must be poetry of a high order of\",\"PeriodicalId\":86631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Osteopathic profession\",\"volume\":\"197 1\",\"pages\":\"66-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Osteopathic profession\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1632/PROF.2009.2009.1.66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Osteopathic profession","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1632/PROF.2009.2009.1.66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
我们指定的课文的质量决定了学习这些课文的教育价值,这一假设似乎不言自明,毫无疑问。很明显,一篇文章的质量越高,读起来就越有教育意义。这一观点最具影响力的现代陈述是马修·阿诺德(Matthew Arnold) 1888年的文章《诗歌研究》(The Study of Poetry),阿诺德在文中认为,随着大众宗教信仰的衰落,诗歌必须介入,承担起为新兴的大众民主社会提供精神安慰和意义的重担。但阿诺德强调,诗歌要履行这一新的责任,只有具有最高文学品质的诗歌才能满足。正如阿诺德所说,我们必须“把诗歌的标准定得很高,因为诗歌要能够完成如此崇高的使命,就必须是高水平的诗歌。
The assumption that the quality of the texts we assign determines the educational value of studying those texts seems so self-evident as to be beyond question. It seems obvious that the higher the quality of a text, the more educationally rewarding reading it will be. The most influen tial modern statement of this view is Matthew Arnold's 1888 essay "The Study of Poetry," in which Arnold argued that with the waning of popular religious faith, poetry had to step in and assume the burden of provid ing spiritual comfort and meaning to an emerging mass democratic so ciety. But Arnold stresses that for poetry to fulfill this new responsibil ity, only poetry of the highest literary quality would suffice. As Arnold puts it, we must "set our standard for poetry high, since poetry, to be ca pable of fulfilling such high destinies, must be poetry of a high order of