Maike Holthuijzen, Dave Higdon, Brian Beckage, Patrick J. Clemins
{"title":"应用过程卷积法校准数值模型输出结果的新方法","authors":"Maike Holthuijzen, Dave Higdon, Brian Beckage, Patrick J. Clemins","doi":"10.1002/env.2822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Output from numerical models at high spatial and temporal resolutions is critical for modeling applications in a variety of disciplines. Prior to its use in modeling, output from climate models must be brought to a finer spatial resolution and calibrated with respect to observations. The calibration of model output, referred to as bias-correction, poses many statistical challenges. Here, we develop a bias-correction method in which systematic biases in the mean and standard deviation of model output are corrected. In addition, we employ a novel process convolution approach to correct bias in temporal dependence. We apply this approach to temperature simulations generated by a regional climate model over the Northeastern USA. The goal of this study was to correct systematic bias in model simulations over historical (1976–2005) and future (2006–2099) time periods while simultaneously preserving future trends resulting from carbon emissions scenarios. We compare the proposed method to a quantile mapping method (empirical quantile mapping, EQM). The proposed method resulted in a more effective correction of seasonal biases and temporal dependence compared to EQM.</p>","PeriodicalId":50512,"journal":{"name":"Environmetrics","volume":"34 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/env.2822","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel application of a process convolution approach for calibrating output from numerical models\",\"authors\":\"Maike Holthuijzen, Dave Higdon, Brian Beckage, Patrick J. Clemins\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/env.2822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Output from numerical models at high spatial and temporal resolutions is critical for modeling applications in a variety of disciplines. Prior to its use in modeling, output from climate models must be brought to a finer spatial resolution and calibrated with respect to observations. The calibration of model output, referred to as bias-correction, poses many statistical challenges. Here, we develop a bias-correction method in which systematic biases in the mean and standard deviation of model output are corrected. In addition, we employ a novel process convolution approach to correct bias in temporal dependence. We apply this approach to temperature simulations generated by a regional climate model over the Northeastern USA. The goal of this study was to correct systematic bias in model simulations over historical (1976–2005) and future (2006–2099) time periods while simultaneously preserving future trends resulting from carbon emissions scenarios. We compare the proposed method to a quantile mapping method (empirical quantile mapping, EQM). The proposed method resulted in a more effective correction of seasonal biases and temporal dependence compared to EQM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmetrics\",\"volume\":\"34 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/env.2822\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.2822\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmetrics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/env.2822","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Novel application of a process convolution approach for calibrating output from numerical models
Output from numerical models at high spatial and temporal resolutions is critical for modeling applications in a variety of disciplines. Prior to its use in modeling, output from climate models must be brought to a finer spatial resolution and calibrated with respect to observations. The calibration of model output, referred to as bias-correction, poses many statistical challenges. Here, we develop a bias-correction method in which systematic biases in the mean and standard deviation of model output are corrected. In addition, we employ a novel process convolution approach to correct bias in temporal dependence. We apply this approach to temperature simulations generated by a regional climate model over the Northeastern USA. The goal of this study was to correct systematic bias in model simulations over historical (1976–2005) and future (2006–2099) time periods while simultaneously preserving future trends resulting from carbon emissions scenarios. We compare the proposed method to a quantile mapping method (empirical quantile mapping, EQM). The proposed method resulted in a more effective correction of seasonal biases and temporal dependence compared to EQM.
期刊介绍:
Environmetrics, the official journal of The International Environmetrics Society (TIES), an Association of the International Statistical Institute, is devoted to the dissemination of high-quality quantitative research in the environmental sciences.
The journal welcomes pertinent and innovative submissions from quantitative disciplines developing new statistical and mathematical techniques, methods, and theories that solve modern environmental problems. Articles must proffer substantive, new statistical or mathematical advances to answer important scientific questions in the environmental sciences, or must develop novel or enhanced statistical methodology with clear applications to environmental science. New methods should be illustrated with recent environmental data.