功能性神经影像学引导的PCS主动康复:一种针对nvc的治疗方法的回顾性比较研究

Caleb T. Epps, Marci L Johnson, Alina K. Fong, M. Allen
{"title":"功能性神经影像学引导的PCS主动康复:一种针对nvc的治疗方法的回顾性比较研究","authors":"Caleb T. Epps, Marci L Johnson, Alina K. Fong, M. Allen","doi":"10.35248/2168-975X.19.8.255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent work has demonstrated several advancements in therapeutic options for patients with postconcussion syndrome (PCS). Specifically, active rehabilitation has emerged as a promising direction for the best treatment outcomes. Enhanced Performance in Cognition (EPIC) is one form of active rehabilitation for PCS that uses a multi-disciplinary clinical approach focusing on two primary aims: the objective diagnosis of PCS using a quantitative, biomarker-based form of fMRI, and targeted neurorehabilitation. The targeting and rehabilitation of the neurovascular coupling (NVC) unit is an essential and novel component of this approach. This study seeks to contribute to the current field of active PCS therapy by demonstrating the usefulness of targeting NVC dysfunction. Further, we compare the EPIC protocol to treatment as usual using a retrospective comparative study design. Methods: The principal cohort was designated as all patients who received EPIC treatment from the time original pilot data was published to the time of retrospective data analysis and chart review (June 2016-October 2017) (N=375). Pre- and post-EPIC post-concussion symptom scales (PCSS) and severity index scores (SIS) were measured and compared. Then, based on pre-specified inclusion criteria for chart review, two patient cohorts were retrospectively assigned to treatment order 1 (TO1: N=15) and treatment order 2 (TO2: N=28). SIS was measured at pre-/post-EPIC and pre-/post-treatment as usual (TAU) functional neurocognitive imaging scans. SIS results from the treatment periods were compared and reported. Results: For the principal cohort (N=375), there was a statistically significant reduction in post-EPIC SIS and PCSS. Concerning the treatment cohorts, there was a highly significant (p<0.0001) overall effect of treatment type on SIS but no such effect of treatment order. However, analysis of TO2 alone revealed a significant effect on SIS reduction (p<0.001) if TAU occurs after EPIC therapy. Conclusion: The findings in this study appear to agree with the current body of research that demonstrates the effectiveness of active rehabilitation strategies compared to standard symptom-modulating and rest-based PCS therapies. Further, EPIC-style therapies contribute to the field of active PCS treatment by addressing NVC disruption in addition to the autoregulatory/vasoreactive aspects of PCS pathophysiology.","PeriodicalId":9146,"journal":{"name":"Brain disorders & therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Neuroimaging Guided Active Rehabilitation for PCS: A Retrospective Comparative Study of an NVC-Targeting Therapeutic Approach\",\"authors\":\"Caleb T. Epps, Marci L Johnson, Alina K. Fong, M. Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2168-975X.19.8.255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Recent work has demonstrated several advancements in therapeutic options for patients with postconcussion syndrome (PCS). Specifically, active rehabilitation has emerged as a promising direction for the best treatment outcomes. Enhanced Performance in Cognition (EPIC) is one form of active rehabilitation for PCS that uses a multi-disciplinary clinical approach focusing on two primary aims: the objective diagnosis of PCS using a quantitative, biomarker-based form of fMRI, and targeted neurorehabilitation. The targeting and rehabilitation of the neurovascular coupling (NVC) unit is an essential and novel component of this approach. This study seeks to contribute to the current field of active PCS therapy by demonstrating the usefulness of targeting NVC dysfunction. Further, we compare the EPIC protocol to treatment as usual using a retrospective comparative study design. Methods: The principal cohort was designated as all patients who received EPIC treatment from the time original pilot data was published to the time of retrospective data analysis and chart review (June 2016-October 2017) (N=375). Pre- and post-EPIC post-concussion symptom scales (PCSS) and severity index scores (SIS) were measured and compared. Then, based on pre-specified inclusion criteria for chart review, two patient cohorts were retrospectively assigned to treatment order 1 (TO1: N=15) and treatment order 2 (TO2: N=28). SIS was measured at pre-/post-EPIC and pre-/post-treatment as usual (TAU) functional neurocognitive imaging scans. SIS results from the treatment periods were compared and reported. Results: For the principal cohort (N=375), there was a statistically significant reduction in post-EPIC SIS and PCSS. Concerning the treatment cohorts, there was a highly significant (p<0.0001) overall effect of treatment type on SIS but no such effect of treatment order. However, analysis of TO2 alone revealed a significant effect on SIS reduction (p<0.001) if TAU occurs after EPIC therapy. Conclusion: The findings in this study appear to agree with the current body of research that demonstrates the effectiveness of active rehabilitation strategies compared to standard symptom-modulating and rest-based PCS therapies. Further, EPIC-style therapies contribute to the field of active PCS treatment by addressing NVC disruption in addition to the autoregulatory/vasoreactive aspects of PCS pathophysiology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain disorders & therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain disorders & therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2168-975X.19.8.255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain disorders & therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2168-975X.19.8.255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:最近的研究表明,脑震荡后综合征(PCS)患者的治疗选择取得了一些进展。具体来说,积极康复已经成为一个有希望获得最佳治疗结果的方向。认知增强表现(EPIC)是一种针对PCS的主动康复形式,它采用多学科临床方法,重点关注两个主要目标:使用定量的、基于生物标志物的fMRI形式对PCS进行客观诊断,以及有针对性的神经康复。神经血管耦合(NVC)单元的靶向和康复是该方法的重要和新颖的组成部分。本研究旨在通过证明针对NVC功能障碍的有效性,为当前活跃的PCS治疗领域做出贡献。此外,我们使用回顾性比较研究设计将EPIC方案与常规治疗进行比较。方法:指定主要队列为从原始试点数据发表时间到回顾性数据分析和图表审查时间(2016年6月- 2017年10月)接受EPIC治疗的所有患者(N=375)。测量和比较epic前后脑震荡后症状量表(PCSS)和严重程度指数评分(SIS)。然后,根据预先指定的纳入标准进行图表回顾,回顾性地将两个患者队列分配到治疗顺序1 (TO1: N=15)和治疗顺序2 (TO2: N=28)。在epic前/后和治疗前/治疗后(TAU)功能神经认知成像扫描时测量SIS。比较并报告各治疗期的SIS结果。结果:在主要队列(N=375)中,epic后SIS和PCSS有统计学意义上的显著降低。在治疗队列中,治疗类型对SIS的总体影响非常显著(p<0.0001),而治疗顺序对SIS的影响不显著。然而,单独分析TO2显示,如果在EPIC治疗后发生TAU,则对SIS降低有显著影响(p<0.001)。结论:本研究的结果似乎与目前的研究一致,即与标准的症状调节和休息为基础的PCS治疗相比,积极康复策略是有效的。此外,EPIC-style疗法通过解决NVC破坏以及PCS病理生理的自我调节/血管反应性方面,有助于主动PCS治疗领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional Neuroimaging Guided Active Rehabilitation for PCS: A Retrospective Comparative Study of an NVC-Targeting Therapeutic Approach
Background: Recent work has demonstrated several advancements in therapeutic options for patients with postconcussion syndrome (PCS). Specifically, active rehabilitation has emerged as a promising direction for the best treatment outcomes. Enhanced Performance in Cognition (EPIC) is one form of active rehabilitation for PCS that uses a multi-disciplinary clinical approach focusing on two primary aims: the objective diagnosis of PCS using a quantitative, biomarker-based form of fMRI, and targeted neurorehabilitation. The targeting and rehabilitation of the neurovascular coupling (NVC) unit is an essential and novel component of this approach. This study seeks to contribute to the current field of active PCS therapy by demonstrating the usefulness of targeting NVC dysfunction. Further, we compare the EPIC protocol to treatment as usual using a retrospective comparative study design. Methods: The principal cohort was designated as all patients who received EPIC treatment from the time original pilot data was published to the time of retrospective data analysis and chart review (June 2016-October 2017) (N=375). Pre- and post-EPIC post-concussion symptom scales (PCSS) and severity index scores (SIS) were measured and compared. Then, based on pre-specified inclusion criteria for chart review, two patient cohorts were retrospectively assigned to treatment order 1 (TO1: N=15) and treatment order 2 (TO2: N=28). SIS was measured at pre-/post-EPIC and pre-/post-treatment as usual (TAU) functional neurocognitive imaging scans. SIS results from the treatment periods were compared and reported. Results: For the principal cohort (N=375), there was a statistically significant reduction in post-EPIC SIS and PCSS. Concerning the treatment cohorts, there was a highly significant (p<0.0001) overall effect of treatment type on SIS but no such effect of treatment order. However, analysis of TO2 alone revealed a significant effect on SIS reduction (p<0.001) if TAU occurs after EPIC therapy. Conclusion: The findings in this study appear to agree with the current body of research that demonstrates the effectiveness of active rehabilitation strategies compared to standard symptom-modulating and rest-based PCS therapies. Further, EPIC-style therapies contribute to the field of active PCS treatment by addressing NVC disruption in addition to the autoregulatory/vasoreactive aspects of PCS pathophysiology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信