公众和声誉制裁:卡特尔案例

Franco Mariuzzo, Peter L. Ormosi, Zherou Majied
{"title":"公众和声誉制裁:卡特尔案例","authors":"Franco Mariuzzo, Peter L. Ormosi, Zherou Majied","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3315305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we revive an old debate in the law and economics literature: the relative role of public and private (market-based) sanctions in deterring misconduct. We offer a novel framework, which accounts for public sanctions and a more direct measure of private sanctions, harnessing recent developments in opinion mining. We use the intensity and the sentiment of media exposure of misconduct as a measure of reputational effect and thus an approximation of the private sanction. As a demonstration, we combine event study techniques, sentiment analysis, and classic econometrics on a sample of 339 listed cartel member firms, prosecuted by the European Commission between 1992 and 2015. We offer evidence that in the context of cartels, public and private sanctions act as substitutes.","PeriodicalId":12584,"journal":{"name":"Global Commodity Issues eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public and Reputational Sanctions: The Case of Cartels\",\"authors\":\"Franco Mariuzzo, Peter L. Ormosi, Zherou Majied\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3315305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we revive an old debate in the law and economics literature: the relative role of public and private (market-based) sanctions in deterring misconduct. We offer a novel framework, which accounts for public sanctions and a more direct measure of private sanctions, harnessing recent developments in opinion mining. We use the intensity and the sentiment of media exposure of misconduct as a measure of reputational effect and thus an approximation of the private sanction. As a demonstration, we combine event study techniques, sentiment analysis, and classic econometrics on a sample of 339 listed cartel member firms, prosecuted by the European Commission between 1992 and 2015. We offer evidence that in the context of cartels, public and private sanctions act as substitutes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Commodity Issues eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Commodity Issues eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3315305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Commodity Issues eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3315305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我们将重新讨论法律和经济学文献中的一个老问题:公共和私人(基于市场的)制裁在阻止不当行为方面的相对作用。我们提出了一个新的框架,它考虑到公共制裁和更直接的私人制裁措施,利用舆论挖掘方面的最新发展。我们使用媒体曝光不当行为的强度和情绪作为声誉影响的衡量标准,从而近似于私人制裁。作为实证,我们将事件研究技术、情绪分析和经典计量经济学结合起来,对1992年至2015年间被欧盟委员会起诉的339家上市卡特尔成员公司进行了样本分析。我们提供的证据表明,在卡特尔的背景下,公共和私人制裁起替代作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public and Reputational Sanctions: The Case of Cartels
In this article, we revive an old debate in the law and economics literature: the relative role of public and private (market-based) sanctions in deterring misconduct. We offer a novel framework, which accounts for public sanctions and a more direct measure of private sanctions, harnessing recent developments in opinion mining. We use the intensity and the sentiment of media exposure of misconduct as a measure of reputational effect and thus an approximation of the private sanction. As a demonstration, we combine event study techniques, sentiment analysis, and classic econometrics on a sample of 339 listed cartel member firms, prosecuted by the European Commission between 1992 and 2015. We offer evidence that in the context of cartels, public and private sanctions act as substitutes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信