《创造就业法案》与《劳动法》之间:什么是特定时间雇员协议(PKWT)?

A. Gunadi, Suwinto Johan, Amad Sudiro
{"title":"《创造就业法案》与《劳动法》之间:什么是特定时间雇员协议(PKWT)?","authors":"A. Gunadi, Suwinto Johan, Amad Sudiro","doi":"10.25077/nalrev.v.5.i.2.p.160-170.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"President Jokowi signed the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation (UU Cipta Kerja), but the Constitutional Court (MK) decided to conduct a judicial review. According to the Constitutional Court, the government must revise the Job Creation Law within two years. Two of the five petitioners for judicial review express concern about the Job Creation Law's inclusion of Specific Time Employee Agreements (PKWT). A Specific Time Employee Agreement is a contract between a business/employer and its employees for a specified period. The purpose of this study is to examine Specific Time Employee Agreements. This study employs a normative judicial methodology. The research is unique in discussing Specific Time Employee Agreements from two perspectives: the worker and the employer. Additionally, this research examines how Specific Time Employee Agreements have been implemented in practice thus far. The research concludes that workers lack understanding of Specific Time Employee Agreements, raising concerns about the Job Creation Law. The absence of a formulation regarding precarious work creates legal uncertainty for workers. Ineffective communication between the employer and employees has raised suspicions regarding the Specific Time Employee Agreement between the two parties. The Job Creation Law's socialization of labor cluster legislation requires improvement. To avoid misinterpretation, the definition of non-permanent work must be clarified","PeriodicalId":33148,"journal":{"name":"Nagari Law Review","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between the Job Creation Act and Labor Act: What’s Specific Time Employee Agreement (PKWT)?\",\"authors\":\"A. Gunadi, Suwinto Johan, Amad Sudiro\",\"doi\":\"10.25077/nalrev.v.5.i.2.p.160-170.2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"President Jokowi signed the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation (UU Cipta Kerja), but the Constitutional Court (MK) decided to conduct a judicial review. According to the Constitutional Court, the government must revise the Job Creation Law within two years. Two of the five petitioners for judicial review express concern about the Job Creation Law's inclusion of Specific Time Employee Agreements (PKWT). A Specific Time Employee Agreement is a contract between a business/employer and its employees for a specified period. The purpose of this study is to examine Specific Time Employee Agreements. This study employs a normative judicial methodology. The research is unique in discussing Specific Time Employee Agreements from two perspectives: the worker and the employer. Additionally, this research examines how Specific Time Employee Agreements have been implemented in practice thus far. The research concludes that workers lack understanding of Specific Time Employee Agreements, raising concerns about the Job Creation Law. The absence of a formulation regarding precarious work creates legal uncertainty for workers. Ineffective communication between the employer and employees has raised suspicions regarding the Specific Time Employee Agreement between the two parties. The Job Creation Law's socialization of labor cluster legislation requires improvement. To avoid misinterpretation, the definition of non-permanent work must be clarified\",\"PeriodicalId\":33148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nagari Law Review\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nagari Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.5.i.2.p.160-170.2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nagari Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.5.i.2.p.160-170.2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

佐科威总统签署了关于创造就业的2020年第11号印度尼西亚共和国法(UU Cipta Kerja),但宪法法院决定进行司法审查。根据宪法裁判所的判决,政府必须在2年内修改《创造工作岗位法》。要求司法审查的五名请愿者中有两名对《创造就业法》将特定时间雇员协议(PKWT)纳入其中表示担忧。特定时间雇员协议是企业/雇主与其雇员在特定时期内签订的合同。本研究的目的是检验特定时间员工协议。本研究采用规范的司法方法。该研究的独特之处在于,它从员工和雇主两个角度来讨论特定时间员工协议。此外,本研究考察了具体时间员工协议迄今为止在实践中的实施情况。该研究的结论是,员工对特定时间员工协议的理解不足,这引发了对《创造就业机会法》的担忧。缺乏关于不稳定工作的规定给工人带来了法律上的不确定性。雇主与雇员之间沟通不畅,导致双方签订的《特定时间雇员协议》受到质疑。《就业创造法》关于劳动集群社会化的立法有待完善。为了避免误解,必须澄清非永久性工作的定义
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between the Job Creation Act and Labor Act: What’s Specific Time Employee Agreement (PKWT)?
President Jokowi signed the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 11 of 2020 on Job Creation (UU Cipta Kerja), but the Constitutional Court (MK) decided to conduct a judicial review. According to the Constitutional Court, the government must revise the Job Creation Law within two years. Two of the five petitioners for judicial review express concern about the Job Creation Law's inclusion of Specific Time Employee Agreements (PKWT). A Specific Time Employee Agreement is a contract between a business/employer and its employees for a specified period. The purpose of this study is to examine Specific Time Employee Agreements. This study employs a normative judicial methodology. The research is unique in discussing Specific Time Employee Agreements from two perspectives: the worker and the employer. Additionally, this research examines how Specific Time Employee Agreements have been implemented in practice thus far. The research concludes that workers lack understanding of Specific Time Employee Agreements, raising concerns about the Job Creation Law. The absence of a formulation regarding precarious work creates legal uncertainty for workers. Ineffective communication between the employer and employees has raised suspicions regarding the Specific Time Employee Agreement between the two parties. The Job Creation Law's socialization of labor cluster legislation requires improvement. To avoid misinterpretation, the definition of non-permanent work must be clarified
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信