多器官超声检查对肺栓塞的诊断价值

Rosen Petkov, N. Kurtelova, Y. Yamakova, E. Mekov
{"title":"多器官超声检查对肺栓塞的诊断价值","authors":"Rosen Petkov, N. Kurtelova, Y. Yamakova, E. Mekov","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism (PE) are nonspecific and multidetector CT pulmonary angiography (MCTPA) is largely used as a second-line imaging test, exposing patients to high-dose radiation and potential complications. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of multiorgan ultrasonography (MOUS): chest (ChUS), heart (EchCG), and leg vein compression ultrasonography (CUS) combined with Wells score and D-dimer. Methods: In a prospective study (02.2017-02.2018) we observed 55 consecutive adults (28 males and 27 females) age x = 56.2 ± SD 14.0 with suspected PE. All patients with Wells score >4 and those with score Results: PE was diagnosed in 42 of 55 enrolled patients (76.4%). ChUS yielded sensitivity (Se) 66% and specificity (Sp) of 77%, EchCG 69% and 92%, and CUS 59% and 100%, respectively. One positive result of MOUS was with accuracy (Acc) 91%, Se 95%, Sp 77% for PE. In patients with ≥2 positive US tests the Acc was 84%, Se 81% and Sp 92%. No patient received PE as a final diagnosis among the MOUS negative patients (n=10, 18%). Conclusions: MOUS is more accurate and sensitive than each one single-organ ultrasonography. In emergency conditions and/or in cases contraindicated for CTPA it could be used as an alternative imaging method for PE diagnosis, safely reducing the MCTPA burden.","PeriodicalId":20797,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary embolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiorgan ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism\",\"authors\":\"Rosen Petkov, N. Kurtelova, Y. Yamakova, E. Mekov\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism (PE) are nonspecific and multidetector CT pulmonary angiography (MCTPA) is largely used as a second-line imaging test, exposing patients to high-dose radiation and potential complications. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of multiorgan ultrasonography (MOUS): chest (ChUS), heart (EchCG), and leg vein compression ultrasonography (CUS) combined with Wells score and D-dimer. Methods: In a prospective study (02.2017-02.2018) we observed 55 consecutive adults (28 males and 27 females) age x = 56.2 ± SD 14.0 with suspected PE. All patients with Wells score >4 and those with score Results: PE was diagnosed in 42 of 55 enrolled patients (76.4%). ChUS yielded sensitivity (Se) 66% and specificity (Sp) of 77%, EchCG 69% and 92%, and CUS 59% and 100%, respectively. One positive result of MOUS was with accuracy (Acc) 91%, Se 95%, Sp 77% for PE. In patients with ≥2 positive US tests the Acc was 84%, Se 81% and Sp 92%. No patient received PE as a final diagnosis among the MOUS negative patients (n=10, 18%). Conclusions: MOUS is more accurate and sensitive than each one single-organ ultrasonography. In emergency conditions and/or in cases contraindicated for CTPA it could be used as an alternative imaging method for PE diagnosis, safely reducing the MCTPA burden.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary embolism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary embolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary embolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺栓塞(PE)的临床症状是非特异性的,多探头CT肺血管造影(MCTPA)主要用作二线影像学检查,使患者暴露于高剂量辐射和潜在的并发症。本研究的目的是探讨多器官超声检查(MOUS):胸部(ChUS)、心脏(EchCG)和腿部静脉压迫超声(CUS)结合Wells评分和d -二聚体的诊断价值。方法:在一项前瞻性研究(02.2017-02.2018)中,我们观察了55名年龄x = 56.2±SD 14.0的疑似PE的连续成年人(28名男性,27名女性)。结果:55例入组患者中有42例(76.4%)被诊断为PE。ChUS的敏感性(Se) 66%,特异性(Sp) 77%, eccg分别为69%和92%,CUS分别为59%和100%。其中,MOUS阳性结果的准确率(Acc)为91%,Se为95%,Sp为77%。≥2例US检测阳性的患者Acc为84%,Se为81%,Sp为92%。在mou阴性患者中,没有患者最终诊断为PE (n=10, 18%)。结论:超声造影比单器官超声检查更准确、更灵敏。在紧急情况和/或CTPA禁忌病例中,它可以作为PE诊断的替代成像方法,安全地减少MCTPA负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multiorgan ultrasonography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism
Clinical symptoms of pulmonary embolism (PE) are nonspecific and multidetector CT pulmonary angiography (MCTPA) is largely used as a second-line imaging test, exposing patients to high-dose radiation and potential complications. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic value of multiorgan ultrasonography (MOUS): chest (ChUS), heart (EchCG), and leg vein compression ultrasonography (CUS) combined with Wells score and D-dimer. Methods: In a prospective study (02.2017-02.2018) we observed 55 consecutive adults (28 males and 27 females) age x = 56.2 ± SD 14.0 with suspected PE. All patients with Wells score >4 and those with score Results: PE was diagnosed in 42 of 55 enrolled patients (76.4%). ChUS yielded sensitivity (Se) 66% and specificity (Sp) of 77%, EchCG 69% and 92%, and CUS 59% and 100%, respectively. One positive result of MOUS was with accuracy (Acc) 91%, Se 95%, Sp 77% for PE. In patients with ≥2 positive US tests the Acc was 84%, Se 81% and Sp 92%. No patient received PE as a final diagnosis among the MOUS negative patients (n=10, 18%). Conclusions: MOUS is more accurate and sensitive than each one single-organ ultrasonography. In emergency conditions and/or in cases contraindicated for CTPA it could be used as an alternative imaging method for PE diagnosis, safely reducing the MCTPA burden.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信