{"title":"Muḥammad,修士和犹太人:Baḥīrā传说版本中的比较宗教","authors":"David M. Freidenreich","doi":"10.46586/er.13.2022.9644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":" Early Muslims told a tale about Baḥīrā, a Christian monk who identified the young Muḥammad as the long-awaited prophet and warned the boy’s guardian to protect him from murderous Jews. This legend proved so popular that not only later Muslims but also Christians, Samaritans, and Jews themselves retold it in widely divergent ways. This study analyzes the foundational version of the Baḥīrā legend that appears in the Sīra of Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq (d. ca. 768 CE) alongside others whose genealogical relationship to it is demonstrable. Within these tales, comparison functions as a powerful rhetorical tool by means of which premodern authors denigrate their targets. Academic comparison of the Baḥīrā legend’s many versions, in contrast, reveals the distinctive ways in which premodern authors from different communities understood the similarities and differences not only between their own community and its rivals but also among those rivals. This article demonstrates the utility of Oliver Freiberger’s methodological framework for comparative religion and, more specifically, the analytical value of juxtaposing sources in order to generate insights that deepen understanding of each comparand in its own right.","PeriodicalId":36421,"journal":{"name":"Entangled Religions","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muḥammad, the Monk, and the Jews: Comparative Religion in Versions of the Baḥīrā Legend\",\"authors\":\"David M. Freidenreich\",\"doi\":\"10.46586/er.13.2022.9644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\" Early Muslims told a tale about Baḥīrā, a Christian monk who identified the young Muḥammad as the long-awaited prophet and warned the boy’s guardian to protect him from murderous Jews. This legend proved so popular that not only later Muslims but also Christians, Samaritans, and Jews themselves retold it in widely divergent ways. This study analyzes the foundational version of the Baḥīrā legend that appears in the Sīra of Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq (d. ca. 768 CE) alongside others whose genealogical relationship to it is demonstrable. Within these tales, comparison functions as a powerful rhetorical tool by means of which premodern authors denigrate their targets. Academic comparison of the Baḥīrā legend’s many versions, in contrast, reveals the distinctive ways in which premodern authors from different communities understood the similarities and differences not only between their own community and its rivals but also among those rivals. This article demonstrates the utility of Oliver Freiberger’s methodological framework for comparative religion and, more specifically, the analytical value of juxtaposing sources in order to generate insights that deepen understanding of each comparand in its own right.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entangled Religions\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entangled Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46586/er.13.2022.9644\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entangled Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46586/er.13.2022.9644","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
早期的穆斯林有一个关于Baḥīrā的故事,一个基督教僧侣认出年轻的Muḥammad就是人们期待已久的先知,并警告男孩的监护人保护他免受犹太人的杀戮。事实证明,这个传说非常受欢迎,不仅是后来的穆斯林,还有基督徒、撒玛利亚人和犹太人自己,都以各种不同的方式复述了这个传说。本研究分析了出现在Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq(约公元768年)的s . ra中的Baḥīrā传说的基础版本,以及其他与它有明显家谱关系的版本。在这些故事中,比较是一种强大的修辞工具,前现代作家通过比较来诋毁他们的目标。相比之下,对Baḥīrā传说的许多版本的学术比较揭示了来自不同社区的前现代作家理解他们自己的社区与其竞争对手之间以及竞争对手之间的异同的独特方式。这篇文章展示了Oliver Freiberger的比较宗教方法论框架的实用性,更具体地说,并置资源的分析价值,以产生加深对每个公司本身的理解的见解。
Muḥammad, the Monk, and the Jews: Comparative Religion in Versions of the Baḥīrā Legend
Early Muslims told a tale about Baḥīrā, a Christian monk who identified the young Muḥammad as the long-awaited prophet and warned the boy’s guardian to protect him from murderous Jews. This legend proved so popular that not only later Muslims but also Christians, Samaritans, and Jews themselves retold it in widely divergent ways. This study analyzes the foundational version of the Baḥīrā legend that appears in the Sīra of Muḥammad ibn Isḥāq (d. ca. 768 CE) alongside others whose genealogical relationship to it is demonstrable. Within these tales, comparison functions as a powerful rhetorical tool by means of which premodern authors denigrate their targets. Academic comparison of the Baḥīrā legend’s many versions, in contrast, reveals the distinctive ways in which premodern authors from different communities understood the similarities and differences not only between their own community and its rivals but also among those rivals. This article demonstrates the utility of Oliver Freiberger’s methodological framework for comparative religion and, more specifically, the analytical value of juxtaposing sources in order to generate insights that deepen understanding of each comparand in its own right.