波罗的海的核能:发展的历史和政治经济特征

Геннадий Викторович Кретинин
{"title":"波罗的海的核能:发展的历史和政治经济特征","authors":"Геннадий Викторович Кретинин","doi":"10.5922/2074-9848-2013-2-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the issues of development of peaceful nuclear power. The author pays attention to the fact that nuclear power as a rather young branch of national economy, however, over recent decades, it has seen rises and falls and a number of states have had tragic experiences of nuclear emergencies; nevertheless, the interest in development, generation, and application of nuclear power is strong in many countries, including the Baltics. In the Baltics, nuclear power dates back to the Soviet times, but its development was suspended pursuant to the EU regulations (the Ignalina NPP). Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia have been striving for energy independence from Russia – the principal supplier of energy carriers to these countries. For a long time, the three Baltic states have been proclaiming their unanimity on the general European path of development. However, the reality proved it to be different. The touchstone for the achievement of common goals was the idea of constructing a new NPP at the site of the closed Ignalina NPP. The author comes to a conclusion that the joint construction of a new NPP is quite questionable. When it comes to politics, each Baltic state is ready to build its own NPP. Thus, the development of nuclear power in the Baltic region requires joint coordinated actions independent of bloc-inspired interests of the states involved. Moreover, this success will be cemented, if the actions are taken at the level of modern technologies and innovative decisions.","PeriodicalId":30492,"journal":{"name":"Baltijskij Region","volume":"29 1","pages":"41-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Атомная энергетика Прибалтики: история возникновения и политико-экономические особенности развития\",\"authors\":\"Геннадий Викторович Кретинин\",\"doi\":\"10.5922/2074-9848-2013-2-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyses the issues of development of peaceful nuclear power. The author pays attention to the fact that nuclear power as a rather young branch of national economy, however, over recent decades, it has seen rises and falls and a number of states have had tragic experiences of nuclear emergencies; nevertheless, the interest in development, generation, and application of nuclear power is strong in many countries, including the Baltics. In the Baltics, nuclear power dates back to the Soviet times, but its development was suspended pursuant to the EU regulations (the Ignalina NPP). Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia have been striving for energy independence from Russia – the principal supplier of energy carriers to these countries. For a long time, the three Baltic states have been proclaiming their unanimity on the general European path of development. However, the reality proved it to be different. The touchstone for the achievement of common goals was the idea of constructing a new NPP at the site of the closed Ignalina NPP. The author comes to a conclusion that the joint construction of a new NPP is quite questionable. When it comes to politics, each Baltic state is ready to build its own NPP. Thus, the development of nuclear power in the Baltic region requires joint coordinated actions independent of bloc-inspired interests of the states involved. Moreover, this success will be cemented, if the actions are taken at the level of modern technologies and innovative decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltijskij Region\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"41-50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltijskij Region\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5922/2074-9848-2013-2-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltijskij Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5922/2074-9848-2013-2-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了和平发展核能的若干问题。作者注意到,核电作为国民经济中一个相当年轻的部门,但近几十年来,它经历了兴衰起伏,许多国家都有过核应急的悲惨经历;然而,在包括波罗的海国家在内的许多国家,对发展、发电和应用核能的兴趣很强。在波罗的海国家,核电可以追溯到苏联时代,但根据欧盟的规定(伊格纳利纳核电站),其发展被暂停。立陶宛、拉脱维亚和爱沙尼亚一直在努力摆脱俄罗斯的能源独立,俄罗斯是这些国家的主要能源供应国。长期以来,三个波罗的海国家一直在宣布它们对欧洲总体发展道路的一致意见。然而,现实证明并非如此。实现共同目标的试金石是在关闭的伊格纳利纳核电站的原址上建造一座新核电站的想法。作者得出结论,联合建设新核电站是非常值得怀疑的。说到政治,每个波罗的海国家都准备建立自己的核电站。因此,波罗的海地区核电的发展需要独立于相关国家集团利益的联合协调行动。此外,如果在现代技术和创新决策层面采取行动,这一成功将得到巩固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Атомная энергетика Прибалтики: история возникновения и политико-экономические особенности развития
This article analyses the issues of development of peaceful nuclear power. The author pays attention to the fact that nuclear power as a rather young branch of national economy, however, over recent decades, it has seen rises and falls and a number of states have had tragic experiences of nuclear emergencies; nevertheless, the interest in development, generation, and application of nuclear power is strong in many countries, including the Baltics. In the Baltics, nuclear power dates back to the Soviet times, but its development was suspended pursuant to the EU regulations (the Ignalina NPP). Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia have been striving for energy independence from Russia – the principal supplier of energy carriers to these countries. For a long time, the three Baltic states have been proclaiming their unanimity on the general European path of development. However, the reality proved it to be different. The touchstone for the achievement of common goals was the idea of constructing a new NPP at the site of the closed Ignalina NPP. The author comes to a conclusion that the joint construction of a new NPP is quite questionable. When it comes to politics, each Baltic state is ready to build its own NPP. Thus, the development of nuclear power in the Baltic region requires joint coordinated actions independent of bloc-inspired interests of the states involved. Moreover, this success will be cemented, if the actions are taken at the level of modern technologies and innovative decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信