摘要的修辞手法:调查雅加达英语教育系学生的摘要论文

Karmila Karmila, M. Laila
{"title":"摘要的修辞手法:调查雅加达英语教育系学生的摘要论文","authors":"Karmila Karmila, M. Laila","doi":"10.23917/humaniora.v21i2.11208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract in the thesis is a must, even in the journal, research article, conference, or dissertation. People could decide whether they want to continue the full content in the paper through abstract. This research aims to what extent the rhetorical structure of abstracts follows the structure of their RAs in terms of IMRD structure and what rhetorical moves writers most frequently employ in the abstract sections of the Bachelor Abstract Thesis English Education Department. Corpus data was used to do the research. The document of abstracts 40 in total and were chosen from Undergraduate degree students in English Education Department at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. The abstracts were selected randomly, and it is consists of two types of concentrations in the field of education and literature. The selected abstracts were published between 2018 to 2019. The instruments were using Hyland's  (2000) five moves to identify the selected abstracts' rhetorical structure. The result showed that most of the abstracts have a purpose (100%), then method (97,5%), and the result or product is 87,5%. The conclusion is only 22,5%, and the introduction was rarely used, it showed only 5%.","PeriodicalId":55711,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RHETORICAL MOVES OF ABSTRACTS: INVESTIGATING ABSTRACTS THESIS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN SURAKARTA\",\"authors\":\"Karmila Karmila, M. Laila\",\"doi\":\"10.23917/humaniora.v21i2.11208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract in the thesis is a must, even in the journal, research article, conference, or dissertation. People could decide whether they want to continue the full content in the paper through abstract. This research aims to what extent the rhetorical structure of abstracts follows the structure of their RAs in terms of IMRD structure and what rhetorical moves writers most frequently employ in the abstract sections of the Bachelor Abstract Thesis English Education Department. Corpus data was used to do the research. The document of abstracts 40 in total and were chosen from Undergraduate degree students in English Education Department at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. The abstracts were selected randomly, and it is consists of two types of concentrations in the field of education and literature. The selected abstracts were published between 2018 to 2019. The instruments were using Hyland's  (2000) five moves to identify the selected abstracts' rhetorical structure. The result showed that most of the abstracts have a purpose (100%), then method (97,5%), and the result or product is 87,5%. The conclusion is only 22,5%, and the introduction was rarely used, it showed only 5%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55711,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v21i2.11208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v21i2.11208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要在论文是必须的,即使在期刊,研究文章,会议,或论文。人们可以通过摘要来决定是否要继续论文的全部内容。本研究旨在探讨摘要的修辞结构在多大程度上遵循了其IMRD结构的RAs结构,以及作者在本科摘要论文的摘要部分中最常使用的修辞动作。使用语料库数据进行研究。论文摘要共40篇,选自泗水大学英语教育系本科学位学生。摘要是随机选择的,它由两种类型的集中在教育和文学领域。所选摘要发表于2018 - 2019年。这些工具使用Hyland(2000)的五个动作来识别所选摘要的修辞结构。结果表明,大多数摘要有目的(100%),其次是方法(97.5%),结果或产品(87.5%)。结论只有22.5%,引言很少使用,只有5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RHETORICAL MOVES OF ABSTRACTS: INVESTIGATING ABSTRACTS THESIS OF ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT STUDENTS IN SURAKARTA
Abstract in the thesis is a must, even in the journal, research article, conference, or dissertation. People could decide whether they want to continue the full content in the paper through abstract. This research aims to what extent the rhetorical structure of abstracts follows the structure of their RAs in terms of IMRD structure and what rhetorical moves writers most frequently employ in the abstract sections of the Bachelor Abstract Thesis English Education Department. Corpus data was used to do the research. The document of abstracts 40 in total and were chosen from Undergraduate degree students in English Education Department at Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. The abstracts were selected randomly, and it is consists of two types of concentrations in the field of education and literature. The selected abstracts were published between 2018 to 2019. The instruments were using Hyland's  (2000) five moves to identify the selected abstracts' rhetorical structure. The result showed that most of the abstracts have a purpose (100%), then method (97,5%), and the result or product is 87,5%. The conclusion is only 22,5%, and the introduction was rarely used, it showed only 5%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信