老年男性皮质骨面积与骨矿物质密度独立预测骨折事件

C. Ohlsson, D. Sundh, Andreas Wallerek, M. Nilsson, M. Karlsson, H. Johansson, D. Mellström, M. Lorentzon
{"title":"老年男性皮质骨面积与骨矿物质密度独立预测骨折事件","authors":"C. Ohlsson, D. Sundh, Andreas Wallerek, M. Nilsson, M. Karlsson, H. Johansson, D. Mellström, M. Lorentzon","doi":"10.1210/jc.2016-3177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used clinically to predict fracture but does not discriminate between trabecular and cortical bone assessment. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether information on cortical and trabecular bone predict fracture risk independently of aBMD and clinical risk factors. Design and Participants: Cortical area, bone mass, porosity, and trabecular bone volume fraction (BVTV) were measured at the tibia using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in 456 men (80.2 ± 3.5 years) recruited from the general population in Gothenburg, Sweden. aBMD was measured using DXA. Incident fractures (71 men) were X-ray verified. Associations were evaluated using Cox regression. Results: Cortical area [hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation (SD) decrease, 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.58 to 2.65], cortical bone mass (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.70), and BVTV (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.07), but not cortical porosity, were independently associated with fracture risk. These associations remained after adjustment for femoral neck aBMD and Fracture Risk Assessment risk factors (area: HR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.66; mass: HR 1.99, 95% CI, 1.45 to 2.74; BV/TV: HR 1.46, 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.96). After entering BV/TV and cortical area or bone mass simultaneously in the adjusted models, only the cortical parameters remained important predictors of fracture. Conclusion: HR-pQCT measurement of cortical area and mass might add clinically useful information for the evaluation of fracture risk.","PeriodicalId":22632,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"51 1","pages":"516–524"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cortical Bone Area Predicts Incident Fractures Independently of Areal Bone Mineral Density in Older Men\",\"authors\":\"C. Ohlsson, D. Sundh, Andreas Wallerek, M. Nilsson, M. Karlsson, H. Johansson, D. Mellström, M. Lorentzon\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/jc.2016-3177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used clinically to predict fracture but does not discriminate between trabecular and cortical bone assessment. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether information on cortical and trabecular bone predict fracture risk independently of aBMD and clinical risk factors. Design and Participants: Cortical area, bone mass, porosity, and trabecular bone volume fraction (BVTV) were measured at the tibia using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in 456 men (80.2 ± 3.5 years) recruited from the general population in Gothenburg, Sweden. aBMD was measured using DXA. Incident fractures (71 men) were X-ray verified. Associations were evaluated using Cox regression. Results: Cortical area [hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation (SD) decrease, 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.58 to 2.65], cortical bone mass (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.70), and BVTV (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.07), but not cortical porosity, were independently associated with fracture risk. These associations remained after adjustment for femoral neck aBMD and Fracture Risk Assessment risk factors (area: HR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.66; mass: HR 1.99, 95% CI, 1.45 to 2.74; BV/TV: HR 1.46, 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.96). After entering BV/TV and cortical area or bone mass simultaneously in the adjusted models, only the cortical parameters remained important predictors of fracture. Conclusion: HR-pQCT measurement of cortical area and mass might add clinically useful information for the evaluation of fracture risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"516–524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-3177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-3177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

背景:使用双能x线骨密度仪(DXA)测量的面骨矿物质密度(aBMD)在临床上用于预测骨折,但不能区分小梁骨和皮质骨评估。目的:本研究旨在探讨皮质骨和骨小梁信息是否独立于aBMD和临床危险因素预测骨折风险。设计和参与者:采用高分辨率外周定量计算机断层扫描(HR-pQCT)测量了456名男性(80.2±3.5岁)的胫骨皮质面积、骨量、孔隙度和骨小梁体积分数(BVTV)。用DXA测定aBMD。对71例男性的偶发性骨折进行了x线检查。使用Cox回归评估相关性。结果:皮质面积[每标准差风险比(HR) (SD)降低,2.05;95%可信区间(CI), 1.58 ~ 2.65],皮质骨量(HR, 2.07;95% CI, 1.58 ~ 2.70)和BVTV (HR, 1.62;95% CI, 1.26 - 2.07),但皮质孔隙度与骨折风险无关。在调整股骨颈aBMD和骨折风险评估危险因素后,这些相关性仍然存在(区域:HR 1.96, 95% CI 1.44 ~ 2.66;质量:HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.45 ~ 2.74;BV/TV: HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.09 ~ 1.96)。在调整后的模型中同时输入BV/TV和皮质面积或骨量后,只有皮质参数仍然是骨折的重要预测因子。结论:HR-pQCT测量皮质面积和质量可为骨折风险评估提供临床有用信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cortical Bone Area Predicts Incident Fractures Independently of Areal Bone Mineral Density in Older Men
Context: Areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used clinically to predict fracture but does not discriminate between trabecular and cortical bone assessment. Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether information on cortical and trabecular bone predict fracture risk independently of aBMD and clinical risk factors. Design and Participants: Cortical area, bone mass, porosity, and trabecular bone volume fraction (BVTV) were measured at the tibia using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in 456 men (80.2 ± 3.5 years) recruited from the general population in Gothenburg, Sweden. aBMD was measured using DXA. Incident fractures (71 men) were X-ray verified. Associations were evaluated using Cox regression. Results: Cortical area [hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation (SD) decrease, 2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.58 to 2.65], cortical bone mass (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.58 to 2.70), and BVTV (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.07), but not cortical porosity, were independently associated with fracture risk. These associations remained after adjustment for femoral neck aBMD and Fracture Risk Assessment risk factors (area: HR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.66; mass: HR 1.99, 95% CI, 1.45 to 2.74; BV/TV: HR 1.46, 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.96). After entering BV/TV and cortical area or bone mass simultaneously in the adjusted models, only the cortical parameters remained important predictors of fracture. Conclusion: HR-pQCT measurement of cortical area and mass might add clinically useful information for the evaluation of fracture risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信