"从健康专家到健康向导":动机访谈的学习过程和影响因素。

IF 1.2 1区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-26 DOI:10.1177/10901981221084271
Sophie Langlois, Johanne Goudreau
{"title":"\"从健康专家到健康向导\":动机访谈的学习过程和影响因素。","authors":"Sophie Langlois, Johanne Goudreau","doi":"10.1177/10901981221084271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motivational interviewing is an evidence-based counseling approach. However, its learning processes and their influencing factors are understudied, failing to address the suboptimal use of motivational interviewing in clinical practice. A participatory action research was conducted in collaboration with 16 primary care clinicians, who encountered similar challenges through their previous counseling approaches. The study aimed to facilitate and describe the clinicians' professional transformation through interprofessional communities of practice on motivational interviewing (ICP-MI). Data were collected using the principal investigator's research journal and participant observation of four independent ICP-MIs (76 h) followed by focus groups (8 h). The co-participants performed inductive qualitative data analysis. Results report that learning motivational interviewing requires a paradigm shift from health experts to health guides. The learning processes were initiated by the creation of an openness to the MI spirit and rapidly evolved into iterative processes of MI spirit embodiment and MI skill building. The intrinsic influencing factors involved the clinician's personal traits and professional background; the extrinsic influencing factor was the shared culture disseminating the expert care model. Previously described in a fragmented manner, motivational interviewing learning processes, and its influencing factors were presented as integrated findings. Considerations in elaborating effective MI training/implementation programs are discussed for clinicians, trainers, and decision-makers. Future areas of investigation are also highlighted calling forth the research community to contribute to knowledge advancement on health education in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45863,"journal":{"name":"RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY","volume":"69 1","pages":"251-259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"From Health Experts to Health Guides\\\": Motivational Interviewing Learning Processes and Influencing Factors.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Langlois, Johanne Goudreau\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10901981221084271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Motivational interviewing is an evidence-based counseling approach. However, its learning processes and their influencing factors are understudied, failing to address the suboptimal use of motivational interviewing in clinical practice. A participatory action research was conducted in collaboration with 16 primary care clinicians, who encountered similar challenges through their previous counseling approaches. The study aimed to facilitate and describe the clinicians' professional transformation through interprofessional communities of practice on motivational interviewing (ICP-MI). Data were collected using the principal investigator's research journal and participant observation of four independent ICP-MIs (76 h) followed by focus groups (8 h). The co-participants performed inductive qualitative data analysis. Results report that learning motivational interviewing requires a paradigm shift from health experts to health guides. The learning processes were initiated by the creation of an openness to the MI spirit and rapidly evolved into iterative processes of MI spirit embodiment and MI skill building. The intrinsic influencing factors involved the clinician's personal traits and professional background; the extrinsic influencing factor was the shared culture disseminating the expert care model. Previously described in a fragmented manner, motivational interviewing learning processes, and its influencing factors were presented as integrated findings. Considerations in elaborating effective MI training/implementation programs are discussed for clinicians, trainers, and decision-makers. Future areas of investigation are also highlighted calling forth the research community to contribute to knowledge advancement on health education in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"251-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981221084271\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981221084271","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动机访谈是一种以证据为基础的咨询方法。然而,人们对其学习过程及其影响因素的研究不足,未能解决激励式面谈在临床实践中使用效果不佳的问题。我们与 16 名初级保健临床医生合作开展了一项参与式行动研究,他们在以往的咨询方法中遇到过类似的挑战。该研究旨在通过激励式访谈(ICP-MI)跨专业实践社区,促进和描述临床医生的专业转型。数据收集采用了主要研究者的研究日志和对四次独立的 ICP-MI 的参与观察(76 小时),然后是焦点小组(8 小时)。共同参与者对数据进行了归纳定性分析。结果表明,学习动机访谈需要从健康专家到健康指导者的范式转变。学习过程由建立对激励式访谈精神的开放性开始,并迅速发展为激励式访谈精神的体现和激励式访谈技能的培养的迭代过程。内在影响因素包括临床医生的个人特质和专业背景;外在影响因素则是传播专家护理模式的共享文化。激励式访谈的学习过程及其影响因素以前是以零散的方式描述的,现在则作为综合研究结果呈现出来。讨论了临床医生、培训师和决策者在制定有效的激励式面谈培训/实施计划时应考虑的因素。此外,还强调了未来的研究领域,呼吁研究界为提高初级保健健康教育的知识水平做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"From Health Experts to Health Guides": Motivational Interviewing Learning Processes and Influencing Factors.

Motivational interviewing is an evidence-based counseling approach. However, its learning processes and their influencing factors are understudied, failing to address the suboptimal use of motivational interviewing in clinical practice. A participatory action research was conducted in collaboration with 16 primary care clinicians, who encountered similar challenges through their previous counseling approaches. The study aimed to facilitate and describe the clinicians' professional transformation through interprofessional communities of practice on motivational interviewing (ICP-MI). Data were collected using the principal investigator's research journal and participant observation of four independent ICP-MIs (76 h) followed by focus groups (8 h). The co-participants performed inductive qualitative data analysis. Results report that learning motivational interviewing requires a paradigm shift from health experts to health guides. The learning processes were initiated by the creation of an openness to the MI spirit and rapidly evolved into iterative processes of MI spirit embodiment and MI skill building. The intrinsic influencing factors involved the clinician's personal traits and professional background; the extrinsic influencing factor was the shared culture disseminating the expert care model. Previously described in a fragmented manner, motivational interviewing learning processes, and its influencing factors were presented as integrated findings. Considerations in elaborating effective MI training/implementation programs are discussed for clinicians, trainers, and decision-makers. Future areas of investigation are also highlighted calling forth the research community to contribute to knowledge advancement on health education in primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY
RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Starting with volume 62 (2009), the University of Chicago Press will publish Renaissance Quarterly on behalf of the Renaissance Society of America. Renaissance Quarterly is the leading American journal of Renaissance studies, encouraging connections between different scholarly approaches to bring together material spanning the period from 1300 to 1650 in Western history. The official journal of the Renaissance Society of America, RQ presents twelve to sixteen articles and over four hundred reviews per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信