评估美国东南部中期轮作火炬松和竞争植被对疏后施肥和除草剂施用的响应

John B Young, B. Bullock, C. Montes
{"title":"评估美国东南部中期轮作火炬松和竞争植被对疏后施肥和除草剂施用的响应","authors":"John B Young, B. Bullock, C. Montes","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvad035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Mid-rotation silvicultural treatments (MRT) are commonly applied to loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations in the southeastern United States to improve pine productivity. Competing vegetation is often present in operational plantations and limits site resource availability. The benefits of MRT for pine productivity are well known, but competing vegetation growth has not been extensively studied. Pine and competing vegetation growth within two regions of the southeastern United States was monitored for 8 years following a one-time post-thin application of either fertilization (224 kg ha-1 of nitrogen plus 28 kg ha-1 phosphorus), chemical herbicide (0.8 oz glyphosate and 0.8 oz triclopyr L-1 of water) or their combination. Fertilization significantly increased pine volume growth in the Lower Coastal Plain (LCP, 2.67-4.01 m3ha-1yr-1) and the Upper Coastal Plain/ Piedmont (UCPIE, 0.20-3.72 m3ha-1yr-1). Chemical herbicide application in both the LCP (0.34-4.87 m3 ha-1yr-1) and UCPIE (0.89-1.97 m3 ha-1yr-1) also significantly increased pine volume. Chemical herbicide application, individually and combined, did not result in significant decreases in herbaceous vegetation, but reduced woody vegetation by up to -2.40 m3 ha-1yr-1 in the LCP and -5.67 m3 ha-1yr-1 in the UCPIE. Consequently, we suggest that competing vegetation response should be considered within site-specific management plans aimed at maximizing pine productivity.\n Study Implications: Mid-rotation silvicultural treatments (MRT) improve loblolly pine productivity and are common in the southeast United States. Applications of fertilization and vegetation control following thinning is widespread in operational pine plantations. Competing vegetation is common in operational stands and may inhibit pine growth depending on the abundance and vegetation type. Assessment of both competing vegetation and pine growth following MRT can provide insight on site-specific silvicultural demands. Loblolly pine productivity increased with MRT, and cumulative yield was highest following a combined fertilization and vegetation control. Herbaceous vegetation was not found to be a vigorous competitor for site resources, but the removal of woody vegetation was associated with increased pine growth. Varied responses across the region illustrated the importance of site-specific management for maximizing pine production at mid-rotation.","PeriodicalId":23386,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","volume":"72 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Mid-rotation Loblolly Pine and Competing Vegetation Responses to Post-thin Fertilization and Herbicide Application in the Southeastern United States\",\"authors\":\"John B Young, B. Bullock, C. Montes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jofore/fvad035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Mid-rotation silvicultural treatments (MRT) are commonly applied to loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations in the southeastern United States to improve pine productivity. Competing vegetation is often present in operational plantations and limits site resource availability. The benefits of MRT for pine productivity are well known, but competing vegetation growth has not been extensively studied. Pine and competing vegetation growth within two regions of the southeastern United States was monitored for 8 years following a one-time post-thin application of either fertilization (224 kg ha-1 of nitrogen plus 28 kg ha-1 phosphorus), chemical herbicide (0.8 oz glyphosate and 0.8 oz triclopyr L-1 of water) or their combination. Fertilization significantly increased pine volume growth in the Lower Coastal Plain (LCP, 2.67-4.01 m3ha-1yr-1) and the Upper Coastal Plain/ Piedmont (UCPIE, 0.20-3.72 m3ha-1yr-1). Chemical herbicide application in both the LCP (0.34-4.87 m3 ha-1yr-1) and UCPIE (0.89-1.97 m3 ha-1yr-1) also significantly increased pine volume. Chemical herbicide application, individually and combined, did not result in significant decreases in herbaceous vegetation, but reduced woody vegetation by up to -2.40 m3 ha-1yr-1 in the LCP and -5.67 m3 ha-1yr-1 in the UCPIE. Consequently, we suggest that competing vegetation response should be considered within site-specific management plans aimed at maximizing pine productivity.\\n Study Implications: Mid-rotation silvicultural treatments (MRT) improve loblolly pine productivity and are common in the southeast United States. Applications of fertilization and vegetation control following thinning is widespread in operational pine plantations. Competing vegetation is common in operational stands and may inhibit pine growth depending on the abundance and vegetation type. Assessment of both competing vegetation and pine growth following MRT can provide insight on site-specific silvicultural demands. Loblolly pine productivity increased with MRT, and cumulative yield was highest following a combined fertilization and vegetation control. Herbaceous vegetation was not found to be a vigorous competitor for site resources, but the removal of woody vegetation was associated with increased pine growth. Varied responses across the region illustrated the importance of site-specific management for maximizing pine production at mid-rotation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Forestry\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvad035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvad035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国东南部火炬松(Pinus taeda L.)人工林通常采用中期轮作造林处理(MRT)来提高松树生产力。竞争植被经常出现在运营种植园和限制场地资源的可用性。MRT对松树生产力的好处是众所周知的,但竞争植被的生长还没有广泛的研究。对美国东南部两个地区的松树和竞争植被的生长进行了8年的监测,监测方法是一次性薄施施肥(224公斤每公顷氮加28公斤每公顷磷)、化学除草剂(0.8盎司草甘膦和0.8盎司三氯吡啶L-1水)或它们的组合。施肥显著提高了下海岸平原(LCP, 2.67 ~ 4.01 m3ha-1年-1)和上海岸平原/山前地区(UCPIE, 0.20 ~ 3.72 m3ha-1年-1)松木体积生长。在LCP (0.34 ~ 4.87 m3 ha-1 -1)和UCPIE (0.89 ~ 1.97 m3 ha-1 -1)施用化学除草剂也显著增加了松木体积。化学除草剂单独施用和联合施用对草本植被的影响不显著,但对LCP区和UCPIE区木本植被的影响分别高达-2.40 m3 ha- 1year -1和-5.67 m3 ha- 1year -1。因此,我们建议在特定场地的管理计划中考虑竞争植被的反应,以最大限度地提高松树的生产力。研究意义:中期轮作造林处理(MRT)提高火炬松生产力,在美国东南部很常见。在经营中的松树人工林中,施肥和间伐后植被控制的应用是广泛的。竞争植被在经营林分中很常见,并可能抑制松树的生长,这取决于植被的丰度和类型。在MRT之后对竞争植被和松树生长进行评估,可以深入了解特定地点的造林需求。火炬松产量随MRT的增加而增加,且在配施和植被控制后累积产量最高。草本植被并不是立地资源的有力竞争者,但木本植被的移除与松木生长的增加有关。整个地区的不同反应表明,在轮作中期,针对特定地点的管理对于最大限度地提高松树产量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Mid-rotation Loblolly Pine and Competing Vegetation Responses to Post-thin Fertilization and Herbicide Application in the Southeastern United States
Mid-rotation silvicultural treatments (MRT) are commonly applied to loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations in the southeastern United States to improve pine productivity. Competing vegetation is often present in operational plantations and limits site resource availability. The benefits of MRT for pine productivity are well known, but competing vegetation growth has not been extensively studied. Pine and competing vegetation growth within two regions of the southeastern United States was monitored for 8 years following a one-time post-thin application of either fertilization (224 kg ha-1 of nitrogen plus 28 kg ha-1 phosphorus), chemical herbicide (0.8 oz glyphosate and 0.8 oz triclopyr L-1 of water) or their combination. Fertilization significantly increased pine volume growth in the Lower Coastal Plain (LCP, 2.67-4.01 m3ha-1yr-1) and the Upper Coastal Plain/ Piedmont (UCPIE, 0.20-3.72 m3ha-1yr-1). Chemical herbicide application in both the LCP (0.34-4.87 m3 ha-1yr-1) and UCPIE (0.89-1.97 m3 ha-1yr-1) also significantly increased pine volume. Chemical herbicide application, individually and combined, did not result in significant decreases in herbaceous vegetation, but reduced woody vegetation by up to -2.40 m3 ha-1yr-1 in the LCP and -5.67 m3 ha-1yr-1 in the UCPIE. Consequently, we suggest that competing vegetation response should be considered within site-specific management plans aimed at maximizing pine productivity. Study Implications: Mid-rotation silvicultural treatments (MRT) improve loblolly pine productivity and are common in the southeast United States. Applications of fertilization and vegetation control following thinning is widespread in operational pine plantations. Competing vegetation is common in operational stands and may inhibit pine growth depending on the abundance and vegetation type. Assessment of both competing vegetation and pine growth following MRT can provide insight on site-specific silvicultural demands. Loblolly pine productivity increased with MRT, and cumulative yield was highest following a combined fertilization and vegetation control. Herbaceous vegetation was not found to be a vigorous competitor for site resources, but the removal of woody vegetation was associated with increased pine growth. Varied responses across the region illustrated the importance of site-specific management for maximizing pine production at mid-rotation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信