卡尔·罗杰斯和精神分裂症。罗杰斯关于精神病和精神分裂症思想的演变:文献综述

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
David Oberreiter
{"title":"卡尔·罗杰斯和精神分裂症。罗杰斯关于精神病和精神分裂症思想的演变:文献综述","authors":"David Oberreiter","doi":"10.1080/14779757.2021.1898456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In Carl Rogers’ written work schizophrenia and psychotic symptoms are mentioned over 2300 times. The use of the terms reflects the theoretical background prevailing at the time as well as the practical experience of Carl Rogers. Over the course of the publications a change in access to psychotic phenomena can be observed. In early years, Rogers viewed psychosis as fundamentally different from neurotic or ‘normal’ conditions. He emphasizes the inability of psychotherapy to treat psychosis. This perspective changes with the theoretical development of the person-centered approach. The concept of the dichotomy of neurosis and psychosis is rejected. Rogers is increasingly distancing himself from diagnostic labeling. He succeeds in presenting psychosis as an understandable process and thereby making it accessible to psychotherapy. The description of possible dangers in the therapeutic relationship are initially emphasized, but are losing importance in favor of a strong sense of confidence in the possibilities of the person-centered approach.","PeriodicalId":44274,"journal":{"name":"Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies","volume":"27 1","pages":"152 - 173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carl Rogers and Schizophrenia. The evolution of Carl Rogers’ thinking on psychosis and schizophrenia: a literature survey\",\"authors\":\"David Oberreiter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14779757.2021.1898456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In Carl Rogers’ written work schizophrenia and psychotic symptoms are mentioned over 2300 times. The use of the terms reflects the theoretical background prevailing at the time as well as the practical experience of Carl Rogers. Over the course of the publications a change in access to psychotic phenomena can be observed. In early years, Rogers viewed psychosis as fundamentally different from neurotic or ‘normal’ conditions. He emphasizes the inability of psychotherapy to treat psychosis. This perspective changes with the theoretical development of the person-centered approach. The concept of the dichotomy of neurosis and psychosis is rejected. Rogers is increasingly distancing himself from diagnostic labeling. He succeeds in presenting psychosis as an understandable process and thereby making it accessible to psychotherapy. The description of possible dangers in the therapeutic relationship are initially emphasized, but are losing importance in favor of a strong sense of confidence in the possibilities of the person-centered approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"152 - 173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779757.2021.1898456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Person-Centered and Experiential Psychotherapies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779757.2021.1898456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在卡尔·罗杰斯的著作中,精神分裂症和精神病症状被提及超过2300次。这些术语的使用既反映了当时流行的理论背景,也反映了罗杰斯的实践经验。在出版的过程中,可以观察到精神病现象的变化。早年,罗杰斯认为精神病与神经症或“正常”状态有着根本的区别。他强调心理疗法无法治疗精神病。这种观点随着以人为中心的理论发展而改变。神经症和精神病二分法的概念被拒绝了。罗杰斯越来越远离诊断标签。他成功地将精神病表现为一种可理解的过程,从而使心理治疗能够接触到它。对治疗关系中可能的危险的描述最初被强调,但由于对以人为本的方法的可能性有强烈的信心,它正在失去重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carl Rogers and Schizophrenia. The evolution of Carl Rogers’ thinking on psychosis and schizophrenia: a literature survey
ABSTRACT In Carl Rogers’ written work schizophrenia and psychotic symptoms are mentioned over 2300 times. The use of the terms reflects the theoretical background prevailing at the time as well as the practical experience of Carl Rogers. Over the course of the publications a change in access to psychotic phenomena can be observed. In early years, Rogers viewed psychosis as fundamentally different from neurotic or ‘normal’ conditions. He emphasizes the inability of psychotherapy to treat psychosis. This perspective changes with the theoretical development of the person-centered approach. The concept of the dichotomy of neurosis and psychosis is rejected. Rogers is increasingly distancing himself from diagnostic labeling. He succeeds in presenting psychosis as an understandable process and thereby making it accessible to psychotherapy. The description of possible dangers in the therapeutic relationship are initially emphasized, but are losing importance in favor of a strong sense of confidence in the possibilities of the person-centered approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信