亚里士多德的《时代心理学批判》

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY

Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science Pub Date : 2017-01-26 DOI:10.1515/rhiz-2017-0003

J. Carter

{"title":"亚里士多德的《时代心理学批判》","authors":"J. Carter","doi":"10.1515/rhiz-2017-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Of all the criticisms that Aristotle gives of his predecessors’ theories of soul in De anima I.3–5, none seems more unmotivated than the ones directed against the world soul of Plato’s Timaeus. Against the current scholarly consensus, I claim that the status of Aristotle’s criticisms is philosophical rather than eristical, and that they provide important philosophical reasons, independent of Phys. VIII.10 and Metaph. Λ.6, for believing that νοῦς is without spatial extension, and that its thinking is not a physical motion.","PeriodicalId":40571,"journal":{"name":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","volume":"8 1","pages":"51 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aristotle’s Critique of Timaean Psychology\",\"authors\":\"J. Carter\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/rhiz-2017-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Of all the criticisms that Aristotle gives of his predecessors’ theories of soul in De anima I.3–5, none seems more unmotivated than the ones directed against the world soul of Plato’s Timaeus. Against the current scholarly consensus, I claim that the status of Aristotle’s criticisms is philosophical rather than eristical, and that they provide important philosophical reasons, independent of Phys. VIII.10 and Metaph. Λ.6, for believing that νοῦς is without spatial extension, and that its thinking is not a physical motion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"51 - 78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2017-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2017-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 16

摘要

摘要:亚里士多德在《论灵魂》I.3-5中对前人的灵魂理论进行了批判，其中对柏拉图的《蒂迈奥》中世界灵魂的批判似乎是最没有根据的。与目前的学术共识相反，我主张亚里士多德的批评的地位是哲学的，而不是统计的，它们提供了重要的哲学理由，独立于物理学。VIII.10和Metaph。Λ。6、因为相信νο ο ς没有空间延伸，它的思维不是一种物理运动。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Aristotle’s Critique of Timaean Psychology

Abstract: Of all the criticisms that Aristotle gives of his predecessors’ theories of soul in De anima I.3–5, none seems more unmotivated than the ones directed against the world soul of Plato’s Timaeus. Against the current scholarly consensus, I claim that the status of Aristotle’s criticisms is philosophical rather than eristical, and that they provide important philosophical reasons, independent of Phys. VIII.10 and Metaph. Λ.6, for believing that νοῦς is without spatial extension, and that its thinking is not a physical motion.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Rhizomata-A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量