新辅助化疗对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结淋巴通路的影响

S. Tsuyuki, A. Yamaguchi, N. Senda, Yukiko Kawata, K. Kawaguchi
{"title":"新辅助化疗对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结淋巴通路的影响","authors":"S. Tsuyuki, A. Yamaguchi, N. Senda, Yukiko Kawata, K. Kawaguchi","doi":"10.14800/CCM.850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been the standard therapy for breast cancer; however, whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) should be performed after NAC in clinically node-positive patients is controversial. The indocyanine green (ICG)-fluorescence SLNB method (ICG-SLNB) provides a high identification rate as well as the ability to visualize lymphatic pathways, and previous studies have investigated the lymphatic pathways to sentinel lymph nodes (sentinel lymphatic pathways) using ICG- fluorescence method.  In this study, we used ICG-SLNB to compare the sentinel lymphatic pathways before and after NAC to investigate whether they were affected by chemotherapy. Although the locations of the sentinel lymph nodes were unchanged, NAC did alter 42.8% of the sentinel lymphatic pathway routes. Our data indicate that SLNB after NAC can still detect the sentinel lymph nodes regardless of the presence or absence of metastasis. Since the false negative rates of SLNB after NAC for node-positive patients is higher than that for node-negative patients according to meta-analyses, further investigation is required to determine whether to perform SLNB after NAC for node-positive patients.","PeriodicalId":9576,"journal":{"name":"Cancer cell & microenvironment","volume":"13 7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on lymphatic pathways leading to sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"S. Tsuyuki, A. Yamaguchi, N. Senda, Yukiko Kawata, K. Kawaguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.14800/CCM.850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been the standard therapy for breast cancer; however, whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) should be performed after NAC in clinically node-positive patients is controversial. The indocyanine green (ICG)-fluorescence SLNB method (ICG-SLNB) provides a high identification rate as well as the ability to visualize lymphatic pathways, and previous studies have investigated the lymphatic pathways to sentinel lymph nodes (sentinel lymphatic pathways) using ICG- fluorescence method.  In this study, we used ICG-SLNB to compare the sentinel lymphatic pathways before and after NAC to investigate whether they were affected by chemotherapy. Although the locations of the sentinel lymph nodes were unchanged, NAC did alter 42.8% of the sentinel lymphatic pathway routes. Our data indicate that SLNB after NAC can still detect the sentinel lymph nodes regardless of the presence or absence of metastasis. Since the false negative rates of SLNB after NAC for node-positive patients is higher than that for node-negative patients according to meta-analyses, further investigation is required to determine whether to perform SLNB after NAC for node-positive patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer cell & microenvironment\",\"volume\":\"13 7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer cell & microenvironment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14800/CCM.850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer cell & microenvironment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14800/CCM.850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新辅助化疗(NAC)已成为乳腺癌的标准治疗方法;然而,临床淋巴结阳性患者在NAC后是否应进行前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)存在争议。吲哚菁绿(ICG)-荧光SLNB法(ICG-SLNB)具有较高的识别率和对淋巴通路的可视化能力,已有研究利用ICG-荧光法对前哨淋巴结的淋巴通路(前哨淋巴结)进行了研究。在这项研究中,我们使用ICG-SLNB比较NAC前后的前哨淋巴通路,以研究它们是否受到化疗的影响。虽然前哨淋巴结的位置不变,但NAC确实改变了42.8%的前哨淋巴结通路。我们的数据表明,无论是否存在转移,NAC后的SLNB仍然可以检测到前哨淋巴结。由于meta分析显示淋巴结阳性患者NAC后SLNB假阴性率高于淋巴结阴性患者,因此淋巴结阳性患者NAC后是否需要行SLNB还有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on lymphatic pathways leading to sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been the standard therapy for breast cancer; however, whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) should be performed after NAC in clinically node-positive patients is controversial. The indocyanine green (ICG)-fluorescence SLNB method (ICG-SLNB) provides a high identification rate as well as the ability to visualize lymphatic pathways, and previous studies have investigated the lymphatic pathways to sentinel lymph nodes (sentinel lymphatic pathways) using ICG- fluorescence method.  In this study, we used ICG-SLNB to compare the sentinel lymphatic pathways before and after NAC to investigate whether they were affected by chemotherapy. Although the locations of the sentinel lymph nodes were unchanged, NAC did alter 42.8% of the sentinel lymphatic pathway routes. Our data indicate that SLNB after NAC can still detect the sentinel lymph nodes regardless of the presence or absence of metastasis. Since the false negative rates of SLNB after NAC for node-positive patients is higher than that for node-negative patients according to meta-analyses, further investigation is required to determine whether to perform SLNB after NAC for node-positive patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信