通过以学生为中心的方法比较数学与其他学科之间的跨学科联系

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Andreja Drobnič Vidic
{"title":"通过以学生为中心的方法比较数学与其他学科之间的跨学科联系","authors":"Andreja Drobnič Vidic","doi":"10.17583/redimat.10178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In some European countries inquiry-based learning (IBL) has become popular in primary and secondary mathematics education, especially for science-connected content. On the other hand, problem-based learning (PBL) and project-based learning (PjBL) have a longer history in mathematics, science, technology, engineering (STEM) and in some other fields in higher education. After presenting the theoretical similarities and differences among these three interdisciplinary student-centred approaches, we review the use of them in mathematics education. We analyse a selection of n=112 high quality research articles about the use of IBL, PBL or PjBL in mathematics, and its interdisciplinary connection with other subjects, level of education, type of research method, research design and participants for each study. Based on these characteristics, we identify the differences between the approaches in mathematics education. Finally, detailed examination of a subsample of experimental studies, where effect size is or can be measured, describes differences in interdisciplinary connections between the target approaches and indicate what kind of studies are still missing in mathematics education.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Interdisciplinary Connections between Mathematic and other Subjects through Student-centred Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Andreja Drobnič Vidic\",\"doi\":\"10.17583/redimat.10178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In some European countries inquiry-based learning (IBL) has become popular in primary and secondary mathematics education, especially for science-connected content. On the other hand, problem-based learning (PBL) and project-based learning (PjBL) have a longer history in mathematics, science, technology, engineering (STEM) and in some other fields in higher education. After presenting the theoretical similarities and differences among these three interdisciplinary student-centred approaches, we review the use of them in mathematics education. We analyse a selection of n=112 high quality research articles about the use of IBL, PBL or PjBL in mathematics, and its interdisciplinary connection with other subjects, level of education, type of research method, research design and participants for each study. Based on these characteristics, we identify the differences between the approaches in mathematics education. Finally, detailed examination of a subsample of experimental studies, where effect size is or can be measured, describes differences in interdisciplinary connections between the target approaches and indicate what kind of studies are still missing in mathematics education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.10178\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/redimat.10178","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一些欧洲国家,探究性学习(IBL)在中小学数学教育中越来越流行,特别是在与科学相关的内容中。另一方面,基于问题的学习(PBL)和基于项目的学习(PjBL)在数学、科学、技术、工程(STEM)和其他高等教育领域有着更悠久的历史。在介绍了这三种以学生为中心的跨学科方法之间的理论异同之后,我们回顾了它们在数学教育中的应用。我们选取了n=112篇高质量的研究文章,分析了IBL、PBL或PjBL在数学中的应用,以及它与其他学科的跨学科联系、教育水平、研究方法类型、研究设计和每项研究的参与者。基于这些特点,我们确定了数学教育方法之间的差异。最后,对实验研究的子样本进行了详细的检查,其中效应大小是或可以测量的,描述了目标方法之间跨学科联系的差异,并指出数学教育中仍然缺少什么样的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Interdisciplinary Connections between Mathematic and other Subjects through Student-centred Approaches
In some European countries inquiry-based learning (IBL) has become popular in primary and secondary mathematics education, especially for science-connected content. On the other hand, problem-based learning (PBL) and project-based learning (PjBL) have a longer history in mathematics, science, technology, engineering (STEM) and in some other fields in higher education. After presenting the theoretical similarities and differences among these three interdisciplinary student-centred approaches, we review the use of them in mathematics education. We analyse a selection of n=112 high quality research articles about the use of IBL, PBL or PjBL in mathematics, and its interdisciplinary connection with other subjects, level of education, type of research method, research design and participants for each study. Based on these characteristics, we identify the differences between the approaches in mathematics education. Finally, detailed examination of a subsample of experimental studies, where effect size is or can be measured, describes differences in interdisciplinary connections between the target approaches and indicate what kind of studies are still missing in mathematics education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信