“谈论艺术的意义”:戏剧作为一种社会过程的评价

IF 0.3 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Kamila Lewandowska
{"title":"“谈论艺术的意义”:戏剧作为一种社会过程的评价","authors":"Kamila Lewandowska","doi":"10.1080/14682761.2020.1810500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is concerned with collective judgement-making in the theatre field. Using the empirical case of expert theatre panels, it explores the rules of communicating, testing, and validating judgements in social interactions. The research is based on interviews with 30 theatre critics who served on review panels at the National Contemporary Polish Drama Staging Competition. The results shed light on what kind of statements, behaviour, and actions are perceived as manifestations of rationality in group decision-making. The analysis of data allows to elucidate different tactics, strategies, and efforts – such as providing justifications or preserving emotional distance – undertaken by panel members to secure and cultivate what they believe is a proper evaluation.","PeriodicalId":42067,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Theatre and Performance","volume":"20 1","pages":"18 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Talking sense’ about art: Evaluation of theatre as a social process\",\"authors\":\"Kamila Lewandowska\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14682761.2020.1810500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article is concerned with collective judgement-making in the theatre field. Using the empirical case of expert theatre panels, it explores the rules of communicating, testing, and validating judgements in social interactions. The research is based on interviews with 30 theatre critics who served on review panels at the National Contemporary Polish Drama Staging Competition. The results shed light on what kind of statements, behaviour, and actions are perceived as manifestations of rationality in group decision-making. The analysis of data allows to elucidate different tactics, strategies, and efforts – such as providing justifications or preserving emotional distance – undertaken by panel members to secure and cultivate what they believe is a proper evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Theatre and Performance\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"18 - 34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Theatre and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2020.1810500\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Theatre and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14682761.2020.1810500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文关注戏剧领域的集体判断。利用专家戏剧小组的经验案例,它探讨了在社会互动中沟通、测试和验证判断的规则。这项研究是基于对30位戏剧评论家的采访,他们曾在国家当代波兰戏剧表演比赛的评审小组任职。研究结果揭示了在群体决策中,什么样的陈述、行为和行动被认为是理性的表现。对数据的分析可以阐明不同的战术、策略和努力——比如提供理由或保持情感距离——由小组成员采取,以确保和培养他们认为是适当的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Talking sense’ about art: Evaluation of theatre as a social process
ABSTRACT This article is concerned with collective judgement-making in the theatre field. Using the empirical case of expert theatre panels, it explores the rules of communicating, testing, and validating judgements in social interactions. The research is based on interviews with 30 theatre critics who served on review panels at the National Contemporary Polish Drama Staging Competition. The results shed light on what kind of statements, behaviour, and actions are perceived as manifestations of rationality in group decision-making. The analysis of data allows to elucidate different tactics, strategies, and efforts – such as providing justifications or preserving emotional distance – undertaken by panel members to secure and cultivate what they believe is a proper evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信