心脏手术后患者生命周期分析

V. Hajiyev, T. Erkenov, A. Smechowski, S. Just, O. Grimmig, D. Fritzsche
{"title":"心脏手术后患者生命周期分析","authors":"V. Hajiyev, T. Erkenov, A. Smechowski, S. Just, O. Grimmig, D. Fritzsche","doi":"10.4236/wjcs.2020.105008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% are \nat a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and benefit from implantable \ncardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. ICD implantation is not indicated \nduring the first 40 days after acute myocardial infarction and Methods: This is a retrospective \nstudy conducted in the Heart Center in Cottbus. From 02.2015 through 02.2018 26 \nWCD patients were retrospectively analyzed and followed-up. Patient demographics, \ndefibrillation treatments, and daily wear times were retrospectively obtained \nfrom our clinical database and LifeVest network. The patients were questioned \nabout actual NYHA grade and implanted ICD at the end of follow-up. Results: Twenty-five \npatients (mean age 65, 22 men, 3 women) were treated with a WCD in response to \nheart failure (mean EF = 24%) after cardiac surgery (21 CABG, 1 AVR, 1 AVR + \nCABG, 1 AVR + MVR, MVR + CABG). Average daily use of a WCD was 22.1 (SD ± 2.7) hours \nwhich were worn for 85 days (SD ± 35). At that time 11.96 (SD ± 15) events were \ndetected but not treated, 1 defibrillation performed and no asystole seen. At \nthe end of follow-up (12 months, SD ± 9) 20 patients were questioned. All of \nthe patients were alive and 5 (25%) of them were with implanted ICD. 10 (50%) \npatients were in NYHA grade I, 3 (12%) in NYHA grade II, 3 (12%) \nbetween grade II-III, 2 (8%) in grade III and 2 (8%) patients in NYHA grade IV. Conclusions: A WCD is an effective therapy for prevention of sudden \ncardiac death during the recovery period of heart function after cardiac \nsurgery. This is treatment with high patient compliance.","PeriodicalId":23646,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Patients with LifeVest after Cardiac Surgery\",\"authors\":\"V. Hajiyev, T. Erkenov, A. Smechowski, S. Just, O. Grimmig, D. Fritzsche\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/wjcs.2020.105008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% are \\nat a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and benefit from implantable \\ncardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. ICD implantation is not indicated \\nduring the first 40 days after acute myocardial infarction and Methods: This is a retrospective \\nstudy conducted in the Heart Center in Cottbus. From 02.2015 through 02.2018 26 \\nWCD patients were retrospectively analyzed and followed-up. Patient demographics, \\ndefibrillation treatments, and daily wear times were retrospectively obtained \\nfrom our clinical database and LifeVest network. The patients were questioned \\nabout actual NYHA grade and implanted ICD at the end of follow-up. Results: Twenty-five \\npatients (mean age 65, 22 men, 3 women) were treated with a WCD in response to \\nheart failure (mean EF = 24%) after cardiac surgery (21 CABG, 1 AVR, 1 AVR + \\nCABG, 1 AVR + MVR, MVR + CABG). Average daily use of a WCD was 22.1 (SD ± 2.7) hours \\nwhich were worn for 85 days (SD ± 35). At that time 11.96 (SD ± 15) events were \\ndetected but not treated, 1 defibrillation performed and no asystole seen. At \\nthe end of follow-up (12 months, SD ± 9) 20 patients were questioned. All of \\nthe patients were alive and 5 (25%) of them were with implanted ICD. 10 (50%) \\npatients were in NYHA grade I, 3 (12%) in NYHA grade II, 3 (12%) \\nbetween grade II-III, 2 (8%) in grade III and 2 (8%) patients in NYHA grade IV. Conclusions: A WCD is an effective therapy for prevention of sudden \\ncardiac death during the recovery period of heart function after cardiac \\nsurgery. This is treatment with high patient compliance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcs.2020.105008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/wjcs.2020.105008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左心室射血分数(LVEF)≤35%的患者是心源性猝死(SCD)的高危人群,可从植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗中获益。急性心肌梗死后的头40天内不需要植入ICD。方法:这是一项在Cottbus心脏中心进行的回顾性研究。对2015年2月至2018年2月26例WCD患者进行回顾性分析和随访。从我们的临床数据库和LifeVest网络中回顾性获得患者人口统计资料、除颤治疗和每日佩戴次数。随访结束时询问患者实际NYHA分级和植入ICD。结果:25例患者(平均年龄65岁,22例男性,3例女性)在心脏手术(21例CABG, 1例AVR, 1例AVR + CABG, 1例AVR + MVR, MVR + CABG)后因心力衰竭(平均EF = 24%)而接受WCD治疗。WCD平均每天使用22.1 (SD±2.7)小时,使用85天(SD±35)。当时检测到11.96 (SD±15)例事件,但未进行治疗,1例进行除颤,未见心脏骤停。随访结束时(12个月,SD±9)对20例患者进行问询。所有患者均存活,其中5例(25%)植入ICD。NYHA I级10例(50%),NYHA II级3例(12%),II-III级3例(12%),III级2例(8%),IV级2例(8%)。结论:A WCD是预防心脏手术后心功能恢复期心源性猝死的有效治疗方法。这种治疗具有很高的患者依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Patients with LifeVest after Cardiac Surgery
Background: Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% are at a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy. ICD implantation is not indicated during the first 40 days after acute myocardial infarction and Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted in the Heart Center in Cottbus. From 02.2015 through 02.2018 26 WCD patients were retrospectively analyzed and followed-up. Patient demographics, defibrillation treatments, and daily wear times were retrospectively obtained from our clinical database and LifeVest network. The patients were questioned about actual NYHA grade and implanted ICD at the end of follow-up. Results: Twenty-five patients (mean age 65, 22 men, 3 women) were treated with a WCD in response to heart failure (mean EF = 24%) after cardiac surgery (21 CABG, 1 AVR, 1 AVR + CABG, 1 AVR + MVR, MVR + CABG). Average daily use of a WCD was 22.1 (SD ± 2.7) hours which were worn for 85 days (SD ± 35). At that time 11.96 (SD ± 15) events were detected but not treated, 1 defibrillation performed and no asystole seen. At the end of follow-up (12 months, SD ± 9) 20 patients were questioned. All of the patients were alive and 5 (25%) of them were with implanted ICD. 10 (50%) patients were in NYHA grade I, 3 (12%) in NYHA grade II, 3 (12%) between grade II-III, 2 (8%) in grade III and 2 (8%) patients in NYHA grade IV. Conclusions: A WCD is an effective therapy for prevention of sudden cardiac death during the recovery period of heart function after cardiac surgery. This is treatment with high patient compliance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信