电生理分级评价有症状糖尿病患者腕管综合征的严重程度

R. Habib, Dilruba Alam, R. Islam, R. Islam, N. B. Bhowmik, A. Haque
{"title":"电生理分级评价有症状糖尿病患者腕管综合征的严重程度","authors":"R. Habib, Dilruba Alam, R. Islam, R. Islam, N. B. Bhowmik, A. Haque","doi":"10.3329/bjn.v32i2.57447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most frequent compressive focal mononeuropathy found in clinical practice. Patients mostly experience pain, paresthesia, and less commonly, weakness in the median nerve distribution which badly affects dexterity and grip. Common risk factors include repetitive wrist movements, metabolic and degenerative diseases, connective tissue disease and pregnancy. Nerve conduction study is one of the most sensitive and specific tools to diagnose CTS. This study was aimed to grade the CTS cases according to the severity based on electrophysiological findings and explore its association with clinical presentation of diabetic patients had nerve conduction study at BIRDEM General Hospital. Materials and Methods: This observational study was done in the electro diagnostic clinic of Neurology department, BIRDEM during the period Sept 2015 to Feb 2016. The study included 100 hands of 84 patients suffering from CTS consecutively attending the clinic. All the patients were interviewed and clinically examined. Demographic data including age, gender, occupation, affected hand and hand dominance along with duration of disease were recorded. Patients were graded according to clinical history and objective findings and again based on the Canterbury NCS Severity Scale. \nResults: Of these 84 diabetic patients presenting with impression of CTS 96% were females. Mean age of the study subjects was 49.6±10.1 (28-85). Most of the female patients were housewives. Clinical grading of CTS was as follows: mild symptoms in 54.76%, moderate symptoms in 23.8% and severe symptoms in 28.58% patients. According to The Canterbury NCS Severity Scale out of total 100 hands,3.5% had Grade 2 (Mild ) 30.5%had Grade 3 (Moderate) ,29.4 % had Grade 4 (Severe), 34.1% had Grade 5 (Very severe) disease. Only 2 patients had Grade 6 (extremely severe) lesion. Of the study subjects 22 (26.19%) had bilateral and rest (73.81%) had unilateral disease. \nConclusion: Data demonstrated female preponderance of the diabetic CTS cases of middle age. Proportional graded deterioration of electrophysiological parameters along with the clinical severity grades highlights the fact that NCS provide additional and independent objective evidence in the diagnosis and severity assessment of CTS and plausibly has important role in prioritizing treatment plan. \nBangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2016; Vol. 32 (2): 98-105","PeriodicalId":8727,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrophysiological Grading to Assess the Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Symptomatic Diabetic Patients\",\"authors\":\"R. Habib, Dilruba Alam, R. Islam, R. Islam, N. B. Bhowmik, A. Haque\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/bjn.v32i2.57447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most frequent compressive focal mononeuropathy found in clinical practice. Patients mostly experience pain, paresthesia, and less commonly, weakness in the median nerve distribution which badly affects dexterity and grip. Common risk factors include repetitive wrist movements, metabolic and degenerative diseases, connective tissue disease and pregnancy. Nerve conduction study is one of the most sensitive and specific tools to diagnose CTS. This study was aimed to grade the CTS cases according to the severity based on electrophysiological findings and explore its association with clinical presentation of diabetic patients had nerve conduction study at BIRDEM General Hospital. Materials and Methods: This observational study was done in the electro diagnostic clinic of Neurology department, BIRDEM during the period Sept 2015 to Feb 2016. The study included 100 hands of 84 patients suffering from CTS consecutively attending the clinic. All the patients were interviewed and clinically examined. Demographic data including age, gender, occupation, affected hand and hand dominance along with duration of disease were recorded. Patients were graded according to clinical history and objective findings and again based on the Canterbury NCS Severity Scale. \\nResults: Of these 84 diabetic patients presenting with impression of CTS 96% were females. Mean age of the study subjects was 49.6±10.1 (28-85). Most of the female patients were housewives. Clinical grading of CTS was as follows: mild symptoms in 54.76%, moderate symptoms in 23.8% and severe symptoms in 28.58% patients. According to The Canterbury NCS Severity Scale out of total 100 hands,3.5% had Grade 2 (Mild ) 30.5%had Grade 3 (Moderate) ,29.4 % had Grade 4 (Severe), 34.1% had Grade 5 (Very severe) disease. Only 2 patients had Grade 6 (extremely severe) lesion. Of the study subjects 22 (26.19%) had bilateral and rest (73.81%) had unilateral disease. \\nConclusion: Data demonstrated female preponderance of the diabetic CTS cases of middle age. Proportional graded deterioration of electrophysiological parameters along with the clinical severity grades highlights the fact that NCS provide additional and independent objective evidence in the diagnosis and severity assessment of CTS and plausibly has important role in prioritizing treatment plan. \\nBangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2016; Vol. 32 (2): 98-105\",\"PeriodicalId\":8727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjn.v32i2.57447\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjn.v32i2.57447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:腕管综合征(Carpal tunnel syndrome, CTS)是临床上最常见的压迫性局灶性单神经病变。患者大多经历疼痛、感觉异常,少数情况下,正中神经分布无力,严重影响灵巧性和握力。常见的危险因素包括反复的手腕运动、代谢和退行性疾病、结缔组织疾病和怀孕。神经传导研究是诊断CTS最灵敏、最特异的工具之一。本研究旨在根据电生理结果对CTS病例的严重程度进行分级,并探讨其与BIRDEM总医院接受神经传导研究的糖尿病患者临床表现的关系。材料与方法:本观察性研究于2015年9月至2016年2月在北京中医科学院神经内科电诊断门诊进行。该研究包括84名连续就诊的CTS患者的100只手。所有患者均接受访谈和临床检查。人口统计数据包括年龄、性别、职业、受影响的手和手优势以及疾病持续时间。根据临床病史和客观结果对患者进行分级,并再次根据Canterbury NCS严重程度量表对患者进行分级。结果:84例有CTS印象的糖尿病患者中96%为女性。研究对象的平均年龄为49.6±10.1(28-85)岁。女性患者多为家庭主妇。CTS的临床分级为:轻度症状占54.76%,中度症状占23.8%,重度症状占28.58%。根据Canterbury NCS严重程度量表,在总共100只手中,3.5%为2级(轻度),30.5%为3级(中度),29.4%为4级(严重),34.1%为5级(非常严重)。只有2例患者有6级(极严重)病变。其中22例(26.19%)为双侧病变,其余73.81%为单侧病变。结论:资料显示中年糖尿病CTS患者以女性为主。电生理参数随临床严重程度分级成比例的恶化,凸显了NCS在CTS的诊断和严重程度评估中提供了额外的、独立的客观证据,在确定治疗方案的优先级方面可能具有重要作用。孟加拉国神经科学杂志2016;Vol. 32 (2): 98-105
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Electrophysiological Grading to Assess the Severity of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Symptomatic Diabetic Patients
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most frequent compressive focal mononeuropathy found in clinical practice. Patients mostly experience pain, paresthesia, and less commonly, weakness in the median nerve distribution which badly affects dexterity and grip. Common risk factors include repetitive wrist movements, metabolic and degenerative diseases, connective tissue disease and pregnancy. Nerve conduction study is one of the most sensitive and specific tools to diagnose CTS. This study was aimed to grade the CTS cases according to the severity based on electrophysiological findings and explore its association with clinical presentation of diabetic patients had nerve conduction study at BIRDEM General Hospital. Materials and Methods: This observational study was done in the electro diagnostic clinic of Neurology department, BIRDEM during the period Sept 2015 to Feb 2016. The study included 100 hands of 84 patients suffering from CTS consecutively attending the clinic. All the patients were interviewed and clinically examined. Demographic data including age, gender, occupation, affected hand and hand dominance along with duration of disease were recorded. Patients were graded according to clinical history and objective findings and again based on the Canterbury NCS Severity Scale. Results: Of these 84 diabetic patients presenting with impression of CTS 96% were females. Mean age of the study subjects was 49.6±10.1 (28-85). Most of the female patients were housewives. Clinical grading of CTS was as follows: mild symptoms in 54.76%, moderate symptoms in 23.8% and severe symptoms in 28.58% patients. According to The Canterbury NCS Severity Scale out of total 100 hands,3.5% had Grade 2 (Mild ) 30.5%had Grade 3 (Moderate) ,29.4 % had Grade 4 (Severe), 34.1% had Grade 5 (Very severe) disease. Only 2 patients had Grade 6 (extremely severe) lesion. Of the study subjects 22 (26.19%) had bilateral and rest (73.81%) had unilateral disease. Conclusion: Data demonstrated female preponderance of the diabetic CTS cases of middle age. Proportional graded deterioration of electrophysiological parameters along with the clinical severity grades highlights the fact that NCS provide additional and independent objective evidence in the diagnosis and severity assessment of CTS and plausibly has important role in prioritizing treatment plan. Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2016; Vol. 32 (2): 98-105
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信