2003年版序言

{"title":"2003年版序言","authors":"","doi":"10.1525/9780520957343-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T HE FIRST EDITION OF Caring was published in 1984. In the intervening years, thanks to constructive criticism from people in a variety of fields, I have learned a great deal about my own project. I know more clearly what I was trying to do, what I should have explained more fully, and what I should not have said at all. If I were to undertake the project now, Caring would be a different book, but the text of this edition has not been changed. In this brief preface, I will point to some of the issues that new readers should consider. Perhaps the greatest contribution of care theory as it is developed here is its emphasis on the caring relation. Relations, not individuals, are ontologically basic, and I use \"caring\" to describe a certain kind of relation or encounter. It is certainly true that \"caring\" is also construed as a virtue, as an attribute or disposition frequently exercised by a moral agent. I used the term both ways in Caring, and I was not always careful in noting the distinction. However, my intention is clearly stated at the end of chapter 2 (on the one-caring): \"But caring is a relationship that contains another, the cared-for, and we have already suggested that the one-caring and the cared-for are reciprocally dependent\" (p. 58). Both play significant parts in caring relations. The reciprocity in caring relations is not contractual; that is, we do not expect the cared-for to balance the relation by doing what the one-caring (or carer) does. In equal relations, we do expect that, under appropriate conditions, the parties will exchange places as carer and cared-for. The world is not divided into carers and cared-fors as separate and permanent classes. We are all inevitably cared-fors at many times and, ideally, most of us are carers. However, many relations are not equal or symmetric, and it is in analyzing unequal relations that we see the special contribution of the cared-for. By recognizing the carer's efforts, by responding in some positive way, the cared-for makes a distinctive contribution to the relation and establishes it as caring. In this way, infants contribute to the parent-child rela-","PeriodicalId":79571,"journal":{"name":"Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PREFACE TO THE 2003 EDITION\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/9780520957343-003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"T HE FIRST EDITION OF Caring was published in 1984. In the intervening years, thanks to constructive criticism from people in a variety of fields, I have learned a great deal about my own project. I know more clearly what I was trying to do, what I should have explained more fully, and what I should not have said at all. If I were to undertake the project now, Caring would be a different book, but the text of this edition has not been changed. In this brief preface, I will point to some of the issues that new readers should consider. Perhaps the greatest contribution of care theory as it is developed here is its emphasis on the caring relation. Relations, not individuals, are ontologically basic, and I use \\\"caring\\\" to describe a certain kind of relation or encounter. It is certainly true that \\\"caring\\\" is also construed as a virtue, as an attribute or disposition frequently exercised by a moral agent. I used the term both ways in Caring, and I was not always careful in noting the distinction. However, my intention is clearly stated at the end of chapter 2 (on the one-caring): \\\"But caring is a relationship that contains another, the cared-for, and we have already suggested that the one-caring and the cared-for are reciprocally dependent\\\" (p. 58). Both play significant parts in caring relations. The reciprocity in caring relations is not contractual; that is, we do not expect the cared-for to balance the relation by doing what the one-caring (or carer) does. In equal relations, we do expect that, under appropriate conditions, the parties will exchange places as carer and cared-for. The world is not divided into carers and cared-fors as separate and permanent classes. We are all inevitably cared-fors at many times and, ideally, most of us are carers. However, many relations are not equal or symmetric, and it is in analyzing unequal relations that we see the special contribution of the cared-for. By recognizing the carer's efforts, by responding in some positive way, the cared-for makes a distinctive contribution to the relation and establishes it as caring. In this way, infants contribute to the parent-child rela-\",\"PeriodicalId\":79571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520957343-003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520957343-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一版《关怀》出版于1984年。在这中间的几年里,由于来自各个领域的人的建设性批评,我对自己的项目学到了很多。我更清楚地知道我想做什么,我应该更充分地解释什么,我根本不应该说什么。如果我现在承担这个项目,《关怀》将是一本不同的书,但这一版的文本没有改变。在这篇简短的序言中,我将指出一些新读者应该考虑的问题。也许护理理论最大的贡献,因为它是在这里发展的,是它对护理关系的强调。关系,而不是个体,是本体论的基础,我用“关心”来描述某种关系或遭遇。当然,“关心”也可以被解释为一种美德,一种经常由道德代理人行使的属性或性格。我在“关心”中两种用法都使用了这个词,但我并不总是注意到它们之间的区别。然而,我的意图在第2章(关于一个人的关心)的末尾明确地陈述了:“但是关心是一种包含另一个人的关系,被关心的人,我们已经提出过,一个人的关心和被关心的人是相互依赖的”(第58页)。两者在关爱关系中都扮演着重要的角色。关爱关系中的互惠不是契约性的;也就是说,我们不期望被照顾者通过做照顾者(或照顾者)所做的来平衡关系。在平等关系中,我们确实期望,在适当条件下,各方将交换照顾者和被照顾者的地位。这个世界并没有被分成照顾者和被照顾者这两个独立而永恒的阶级。很多时候,我们都不可避免地被照顾,理想情况下,我们大多数人都是照顾者。然而,许多关系不是平等或对称的,正是在分析不平等关系时,我们看到了被照顾者的特殊贡献。通过承认照顾者的努力,通过以某种积极的方式回应,被照顾者对这种关系做出了独特的贡献,并将其建立为关心。通过这种方式,婴儿有助于亲子关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PREFACE TO THE 2003 EDITION
T HE FIRST EDITION OF Caring was published in 1984. In the intervening years, thanks to constructive criticism from people in a variety of fields, I have learned a great deal about my own project. I know more clearly what I was trying to do, what I should have explained more fully, and what I should not have said at all. If I were to undertake the project now, Caring would be a different book, but the text of this edition has not been changed. In this brief preface, I will point to some of the issues that new readers should consider. Perhaps the greatest contribution of care theory as it is developed here is its emphasis on the caring relation. Relations, not individuals, are ontologically basic, and I use "caring" to describe a certain kind of relation or encounter. It is certainly true that "caring" is also construed as a virtue, as an attribute or disposition frequently exercised by a moral agent. I used the term both ways in Caring, and I was not always careful in noting the distinction. However, my intention is clearly stated at the end of chapter 2 (on the one-caring): "But caring is a relationship that contains another, the cared-for, and we have already suggested that the one-caring and the cared-for are reciprocally dependent" (p. 58). Both play significant parts in caring relations. The reciprocity in caring relations is not contractual; that is, we do not expect the cared-for to balance the relation by doing what the one-caring (or carer) does. In equal relations, we do expect that, under appropriate conditions, the parties will exchange places as carer and cared-for. The world is not divided into carers and cared-fors as separate and permanent classes. We are all inevitably cared-fors at many times and, ideally, most of us are carers. However, many relations are not equal or symmetric, and it is in analyzing unequal relations that we see the special contribution of the cared-for. By recognizing the carer's efforts, by responding in some positive way, the cared-for makes a distinctive contribution to the relation and establishes it as caring. In this way, infants contribute to the parent-child rela-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信