股票市场信念与投资选择:来自实地实验的证据

Christine Laudenbach, Annika Weber, Johannes Wohlfart
{"title":"股票市场信念与投资选择:来自实地实验的证据","authors":"Christine Laudenbach, Annika Weber, Johannes Wohlfart","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3812346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We survey clients of a German online bank to study retail investors' beliefs about the autocorrelation of annual returns of the aggregate stock market, and the role of these beliefs in financial decisions. A majority of our respondents believe in mean reversion of aggregate returns, and these beliefs predict how respondents adjust their portfolios in response to market movements. We provide a random half of our respondents with historical information on the low predictive power of realized returns for year-ahead returns. The information intervention persistently reduces respondents' perceived predictability of aggregate stock returns, and shifts their expected year-ahead return towards the unconditional historical average. There are only minor adjustments of portfolio decisions in the short-term in response to the information. However, among those believing in mean reversion before the intervention, treated respondents display a significantly smaller increase in equity purchases in response to the COVID-19 stock market crash four to five months after the treatment. Our results provide causal evidence on the role of beliefs in trading decisions, and have implications for modeling household behavior and financial market dynamics.","PeriodicalId":8731,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal","volume":"2008 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beliefs About the Stock Market and Investment Choices: Evidence from a Field Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Christine Laudenbach, Annika Weber, Johannes Wohlfart\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3812346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We survey clients of a German online bank to study retail investors' beliefs about the autocorrelation of annual returns of the aggregate stock market, and the role of these beliefs in financial decisions. A majority of our respondents believe in mean reversion of aggregate returns, and these beliefs predict how respondents adjust their portfolios in response to market movements. We provide a random half of our respondents with historical information on the low predictive power of realized returns for year-ahead returns. The information intervention persistently reduces respondents' perceived predictability of aggregate stock returns, and shifts their expected year-ahead return towards the unconditional historical average. There are only minor adjustments of portfolio decisions in the short-term in response to the information. However, among those believing in mean reversion before the intervention, treated respondents display a significantly smaller increase in equity purchases in response to the COVID-19 stock market crash four to five months after the treatment. Our results provide causal evidence on the role of beliefs in trading decisions, and have implications for modeling household behavior and financial market dynamics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"2008 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3812346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral & Experimental Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3812346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

我们调查了一家德国网上银行的客户,以研究散户投资者对总体股票市场年收益自相关的信念,以及这些信念在财务决策中的作用。我们的大多数受访者相信总收益的均值回归,这些信念预测了受访者如何调整他们的投资组合以应对市场波动。我们随机抽取了一半的受访者,提供了关于实现回报对未来一年回报的低预测能力的历史信息。信息干预持续降低了受访者对股票总收益的可预测性,并将他们对未来一年的预期收益转向无条件的历史平均水平。根据这些信息,投资组合决策在短期内只会做出微小的调整。然而,在干预前相信均值回归的受访者中,接受治疗的受访者在治疗后4至5个月因COVID-19股市崩盘而购买股票的增幅明显较小。我们的研究结果为信念在交易决策中的作用提供了因果证据,并对家庭行为和金融市场动态的建模产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beliefs About the Stock Market and Investment Choices: Evidence from a Field Experiment
We survey clients of a German online bank to study retail investors' beliefs about the autocorrelation of annual returns of the aggregate stock market, and the role of these beliefs in financial decisions. A majority of our respondents believe in mean reversion of aggregate returns, and these beliefs predict how respondents adjust their portfolios in response to market movements. We provide a random half of our respondents with historical information on the low predictive power of realized returns for year-ahead returns. The information intervention persistently reduces respondents' perceived predictability of aggregate stock returns, and shifts their expected year-ahead return towards the unconditional historical average. There are only minor adjustments of portfolio decisions in the short-term in response to the information. However, among those believing in mean reversion before the intervention, treated respondents display a significantly smaller increase in equity purchases in response to the COVID-19 stock market crash four to five months after the treatment. Our results provide causal evidence on the role of beliefs in trading decisions, and have implications for modeling household behavior and financial market dynamics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信