中等尺寸钻孔井承载力试验研究

IF 0.4 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
K. Lee, S. You, Jeongjun Park, Jung-Mann Yun, G. Hong
{"title":"中等尺寸钻孔井承载力试验研究","authors":"K. Lee, S. You, Jeongjun Park, Jung-Mann Yun, G. Hong","doi":"10.12814/JKGSS.2019.18.4.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the results of bearing capacity using field loading test of pile, in order to extend the applicability of drilled shaft with mid-size, and the results were compared with the prediction results of design bearing capacity by empirical formular. The static load test result showed that the allowable bearing capacity of high pile strength was about 2.4 times higher than that of low pile strength. The dynamic load test result showed that the allowable bearing capacity of high pile strength was about 1.4 times∼1.5 times higher than that of low pile strength. The comparison result of allowable bearing capacity between static and dynamic load test showed that the difference of allowable load ranged from 3% to 6% under the same settlement conditions. As a result of comparing the ultimate bearing capacity by load test and design bearing capacity, it was found that the FHWA proposed equation could be more reasonable than the other proposed equation in load sharing ratios of end bearing and skin friction.","PeriodicalId":42164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society","volume":"36 1","pages":"263-272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Experimental Study on Bearing Capacity of Drilled Shaft with Mid-size\",\"authors\":\"K. Lee, S. You, Jeongjun Park, Jung-Mann Yun, G. Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.12814/JKGSS.2019.18.4.263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes the results of bearing capacity using field loading test of pile, in order to extend the applicability of drilled shaft with mid-size, and the results were compared with the prediction results of design bearing capacity by empirical formular. The static load test result showed that the allowable bearing capacity of high pile strength was about 2.4 times higher than that of low pile strength. The dynamic load test result showed that the allowable bearing capacity of high pile strength was about 1.4 times∼1.5 times higher than that of low pile strength. The comparison result of allowable bearing capacity between static and dynamic load test showed that the difference of allowable load ranged from 3% to 6% under the same settlement conditions. As a result of comparing the ultimate bearing capacity by load test and design bearing capacity, it was found that the FHWA proposed equation could be more reasonable than the other proposed equation in load sharing ratios of end bearing and skin friction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"263-272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12814/JKGSS.2019.18.4.263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Geosynthetic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12814/JKGSS.2019.18.4.263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了扩大中等尺寸钻孔井的适用性,本文采用现场荷载试验方法对桩的承载力进行了分析,并与经验公式计算的设计承载力预测结果进行了比较。静载试验结果表明,高强度桩的许用承载力约为低强度桩的2.4倍。动载试验结果表明,高强度桩的容许承载力比低强度桩的容许承载力约高1.4 ~ 1.5倍。静、动荷载试验的许用承载力对比结果表明,在相同沉降条件下,许用荷载的差异在3% ~ 6%之间。通过荷载试验极限承载力与设计极限承载力的比较,发现FHWA提出的方程在端部承载分担比和表面摩擦分担比上比其他提出的方程更为合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Experimental Study on Bearing Capacity of Drilled Shaft with Mid-size
This paper describes the results of bearing capacity using field loading test of pile, in order to extend the applicability of drilled shaft with mid-size, and the results were compared with the prediction results of design bearing capacity by empirical formular. The static load test result showed that the allowable bearing capacity of high pile strength was about 2.4 times higher than that of low pile strength. The dynamic load test result showed that the allowable bearing capacity of high pile strength was about 1.4 times∼1.5 times higher than that of low pile strength. The comparison result of allowable bearing capacity between static and dynamic load test showed that the difference of allowable load ranged from 3% to 6% under the same settlement conditions. As a result of comparing the ultimate bearing capacity by load test and design bearing capacity, it was found that the FHWA proposed equation could be more reasonable than the other proposed equation in load sharing ratios of end bearing and skin friction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信