新冠肺炎疫情对英国器官捐献和移植的影响

Shivani Sharma, F. Giovinazzo, Abigail Hucker, Ken Farrington, Chris Lawrence, Guilio Valentino Dalla Riva, A. Cronin
{"title":"新冠肺炎疫情对英国器官捐献和移植的影响","authors":"Shivani Sharma, F. Giovinazzo, Abigail Hucker, Ken Farrington, Chris Lawrence, Guilio Valentino Dalla Riva, A. Cronin","doi":"10.38192/1.7.3.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has placed considerable strain on the allocation of healthcare resources. In this research, we explored the views of healthcare professionals in the UK on the countrywide management of organ donation and transplantation during the first COVID-19 surge in the spring of 2020. \nMethods: An internet-based survey was developed and distributed over a 2-week period in May/June 2020. \nResults: Three hundred and fourteen professionals responded, covering all organ donation and transplant regions across the UK. Data suggest a considerable degree of scaling back of activity in all but one region (Northern Ireland). A range of absolute criteria for organ donation and transplantation were highlighted that have since been implemented in practice. \nNotable strengths of the countrywide response included the donation and transplant community acting responsibly and proportionately (51.6%), providing access to up-to-date information and data (43.9%,) and communicating risk (40.8%). Mixed views were expressed on equity in resource allocation, with 32% aligning with inequity, 28% with equity and 17% of respondents stating that equity issues are not relevant in a crisis. \nConclusion: Findings highlight that managing scarcity is complex during a pandemic. Embedding ethical values in recovery and future threats preparedness should be prioritised.","PeriodicalId":75015,"journal":{"name":"The Homoeopathic physician","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of COVID-19 on Organ Donation and Transplantation in the UK\",\"authors\":\"Shivani Sharma, F. Giovinazzo, Abigail Hucker, Ken Farrington, Chris Lawrence, Guilio Valentino Dalla Riva, A. Cronin\",\"doi\":\"10.38192/1.7.3.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic has placed considerable strain on the allocation of healthcare resources. In this research, we explored the views of healthcare professionals in the UK on the countrywide management of organ donation and transplantation during the first COVID-19 surge in the spring of 2020. \\nMethods: An internet-based survey was developed and distributed over a 2-week period in May/June 2020. \\nResults: Three hundred and fourteen professionals responded, covering all organ donation and transplant regions across the UK. Data suggest a considerable degree of scaling back of activity in all but one region (Northern Ireland). A range of absolute criteria for organ donation and transplantation were highlighted that have since been implemented in practice. \\nNotable strengths of the countrywide response included the donation and transplant community acting responsibly and proportionately (51.6%), providing access to up-to-date information and data (43.9%,) and communicating risk (40.8%). Mixed views were expressed on equity in resource allocation, with 32% aligning with inequity, 28% with equity and 17% of respondents stating that equity issues are not relevant in a crisis. \\nConclusion: Findings highlight that managing scarcity is complex during a pandemic. Embedding ethical values in recovery and future threats preparedness should be prioritised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Homoeopathic physician\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Homoeopathic physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38192/1.7.3.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Homoeopathic physician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38192/1.7.3.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19大流行给卫生保健资源的分配带来了相当大的压力。在这项研究中,我们探讨了英国医疗保健专业人员在2020年春季第一次COVID-19激增期间对全国器官捐赠和移植管理的看法。方法:于2020年5月/ 6月开展为期两周的网络调查。结果:314名专业人员回应,涵盖了英国所有器官捐赠和移植地区。数据表明,除一个地区(北爱尔兰)外,所有地区的活动都在相当程度上缩减。强调了一系列器官捐赠和移植的绝对标准,这些标准已在实践中得到实施。全国范围内应对措施的显著优势包括:捐赠和移植社区采取负责任和相称的行动(51.6%),提供获取最新信息和数据的途径(43.9%),以及通报风险(40.8%)。受访者对资源分配中的公平性的看法不一,32%的受访者认为不公平,28%的受访者认为公平,17%的受访者认为公平问题与危机无关。结论:调查结果突出表明,在大流行期间管理物资短缺是复杂的。应优先考虑在恢复和未来威胁防范中嵌入道德价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of COVID-19 on Organ Donation and Transplantation in the UK
The COVID-19 pandemic has placed considerable strain on the allocation of healthcare resources. In this research, we explored the views of healthcare professionals in the UK on the countrywide management of organ donation and transplantation during the first COVID-19 surge in the spring of 2020. Methods: An internet-based survey was developed and distributed over a 2-week period in May/June 2020. Results: Three hundred and fourteen professionals responded, covering all organ donation and transplant regions across the UK. Data suggest a considerable degree of scaling back of activity in all but one region (Northern Ireland). A range of absolute criteria for organ donation and transplantation were highlighted that have since been implemented in practice. Notable strengths of the countrywide response included the donation and transplant community acting responsibly and proportionately (51.6%), providing access to up-to-date information and data (43.9%,) and communicating risk (40.8%). Mixed views were expressed on equity in resource allocation, with 32% aligning with inequity, 28% with equity and 17% of respondents stating that equity issues are not relevant in a crisis. Conclusion: Findings highlight that managing scarcity is complex during a pandemic. Embedding ethical values in recovery and future threats preparedness should be prioritised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信