用单轴拉伸和水力膨胀试验测定双相钢的力学性能

Rui Amaral , Abel D. Santosa , A.B. Lopes
{"title":"用单轴拉伸和水力膨胀试验测定双相钢的力学性能","authors":"Rui Amaral ,&nbsp;Abel D. Santosa ,&nbsp;A.B. Lopes","doi":"10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Numerical simulations of sheet metal forming processes need the establishment of highly reliable results, which in turn need the accurate identification of mechanical properties. In this paper a study is presented on the choice of the characterization function of flow stress-strain curve of sheet metal materials, as well as the selection of the best yield locus, based on experimental uniaxial tensile and biaxial hydraulic bulge tests performed on dual-phase steels of industrial interest. To obtain a better characterization of the hardening curve, a combination is made using the uniaxial tensile test data with biaxial hydraulic bulge test results, since bulge test covers a larger range of plastic strain when compared to tensile test. Since the two flow curves have different strain paths, they can’t be directly compared or combined. Therefore, it is necessary a transformation of flow stress-strain curve provided from biaxial bulge test into equivalent stress-strain curve. Different methodologies were applied to transform biaxial stress-strain curve to an equivalent one and the different results are compared and evaluated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10198,"journal":{"name":"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais","volume":"29 1","pages":"Pages e239-e243"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.007","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical properties determination of dual-phase steels using uniaxial tensile and hydraulic bulge test\",\"authors\":\"Rui Amaral ,&nbsp;Abel D. Santosa ,&nbsp;A.B. Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Numerical simulations of sheet metal forming processes need the establishment of highly reliable results, which in turn need the accurate identification of mechanical properties. In this paper a study is presented on the choice of the characterization function of flow stress-strain curve of sheet metal materials, as well as the selection of the best yield locus, based on experimental uniaxial tensile and biaxial hydraulic bulge tests performed on dual-phase steels of industrial interest. To obtain a better characterization of the hardening curve, a combination is made using the uniaxial tensile test data with biaxial hydraulic bulge test results, since bulge test covers a larger range of plastic strain when compared to tensile test. Since the two flow curves have different strain paths, they can’t be directly compared or combined. Therefore, it is necessary a transformation of flow stress-strain curve provided from biaxial bulge test into equivalent stress-strain curve. Different methodologies were applied to transform biaxial stress-strain curve to an equivalent one and the different results are compared and evaluated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages e239-e243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ctmat.2016.06.007\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870831217300277\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciência & Tecnologia dos Materiais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0870831217300277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

板料成形过程的数值模拟需要建立高可靠性的结果,这反过来又需要准确的力学性能识别。本文通过对工业用双相钢进行的单轴拉伸和双轴水力膨胀试验,研究了金属板材流动应力-应变曲线表征函数的选择以及最佳屈服轨迹的选择。为了更好地表征硬化曲线,将单轴拉伸试验数据与双轴水力膨胀试验结果结合使用,因为与拉伸试验相比,膨胀试验涵盖了更大的塑性应变范围。由于两种流动曲线具有不同的应变路径,不能直接进行比较或组合。因此,有必要将双轴胀形试验提供的流动应力-应变曲线转化为等效应力-应变曲线。采用不同的方法将双轴应力-应变曲线转化为等效曲线,并对不同的结果进行了比较和评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanical properties determination of dual-phase steels using uniaxial tensile and hydraulic bulge test

Numerical simulations of sheet metal forming processes need the establishment of highly reliable results, which in turn need the accurate identification of mechanical properties. In this paper a study is presented on the choice of the characterization function of flow stress-strain curve of sheet metal materials, as well as the selection of the best yield locus, based on experimental uniaxial tensile and biaxial hydraulic bulge tests performed on dual-phase steels of industrial interest. To obtain a better characterization of the hardening curve, a combination is made using the uniaxial tensile test data with biaxial hydraulic bulge test results, since bulge test covers a larger range of plastic strain when compared to tensile test. Since the two flow curves have different strain paths, they can’t be directly compared or combined. Therefore, it is necessary a transformation of flow stress-strain curve provided from biaxial bulge test into equivalent stress-strain curve. Different methodologies were applied to transform biaxial stress-strain curve to an equivalent one and the different results are compared and evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信