科学战争之外的女权主义网络:18世纪90年代和90年代的“女性大脑”

Paola Govoni
{"title":"科学战争之外的女权主义网络:18世纪90年代和90年代的“女性大脑”","authors":"Paola Govoni","doi":"10.1098/rsnr.2021.0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores female networking practices by comparing cases two centuries apart, an experiment made possible by a history of science renewed by a mutually enriching dialogue with science, technology and society studies (STS). The first part analyses the networking strategies of Clotilde Tambroni (1758–1817), a scholar who managed a university career in Bologna under the shadow of the Napoleonic wars. The second part presents some results of ongoing research on the networking strategies of a group of female feminist evolutionary biologists who, by building a ‘Darwinian feminism’ tradition, offered an alternative response to the 1990s nature-versus-nurture clashes leading to the so-called science wars. Grappling with the myth of a ‘female brain’ and building diachronic as well as synchronic networks among women scholars in both the Napoleonic wars context and the end of the Cold War, the female scholars examined here transcended dualistic simplifications about the nature of knowledge typical of their times. The two cases suggest a long-term, integrated, gendered approach that finds concrete expression in the outcomes of some recent neuroscience research as well as in the ‘gendered innovations in science’ project mentioned in my conclusions.","PeriodicalId":82881,"journal":{"name":"Tanzania notes and records","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feminist networks beyond the science wars: the ‘female brain’ in the 1790s and the 1990s\",\"authors\":\"Paola Govoni\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsnr.2021.0075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores female networking practices by comparing cases two centuries apart, an experiment made possible by a history of science renewed by a mutually enriching dialogue with science, technology and society studies (STS). The first part analyses the networking strategies of Clotilde Tambroni (1758–1817), a scholar who managed a university career in Bologna under the shadow of the Napoleonic wars. The second part presents some results of ongoing research on the networking strategies of a group of female feminist evolutionary biologists who, by building a ‘Darwinian feminism’ tradition, offered an alternative response to the 1990s nature-versus-nurture clashes leading to the so-called science wars. Grappling with the myth of a ‘female brain’ and building diachronic as well as synchronic networks among women scholars in both the Napoleonic wars context and the end of the Cold War, the female scholars examined here transcended dualistic simplifications about the nature of knowledge typical of their times. The two cases suggest a long-term, integrated, gendered approach that finds concrete expression in the outcomes of some recent neuroscience research as well as in the ‘gendered innovations in science’ project mentioned in my conclusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tanzania notes and records\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tanzania notes and records\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2021.0075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzania notes and records","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2021.0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过比较相隔两个世纪的案例来探索女性网络实践,这一实验是由科学史促成的,而科学史又被与科学、技术和社会研究(STS)的相互丰富的对话所更新。第一部分分析了Clotilde Tambroni(1758-1817)的网络策略,这位学者在拿破仑战争的阴影下在博洛尼亚度过了大学生涯。第二部分介绍了一群女性女权主义进化生物学家正在进行的网络策略研究的一些结果,她们通过建立“达尔文女权主义”传统,为20世纪90年代导致所谓科学战争的先天与后天冲突提供了另一种回应。与“女性大脑”的神话作斗争,在拿破仑战争和冷战结束的背景下,在女性学者之间建立了历时性和共时性的网络,这里考察的女性学者超越了对她们那个时代典型知识本质的二元简化。这两个案例表明了一种长期的、综合的、性别化的方法,这种方法在最近一些神经科学研究的结果以及我在结论中提到的“科学中的性别化创新”项目中得到了具体的表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feminist networks beyond the science wars: the ‘female brain’ in the 1790s and the 1990s
This paper explores female networking practices by comparing cases two centuries apart, an experiment made possible by a history of science renewed by a mutually enriching dialogue with science, technology and society studies (STS). The first part analyses the networking strategies of Clotilde Tambroni (1758–1817), a scholar who managed a university career in Bologna under the shadow of the Napoleonic wars. The second part presents some results of ongoing research on the networking strategies of a group of female feminist evolutionary biologists who, by building a ‘Darwinian feminism’ tradition, offered an alternative response to the 1990s nature-versus-nurture clashes leading to the so-called science wars. Grappling with the myth of a ‘female brain’ and building diachronic as well as synchronic networks among women scholars in both the Napoleonic wars context and the end of the Cold War, the female scholars examined here transcended dualistic simplifications about the nature of knowledge typical of their times. The two cases suggest a long-term, integrated, gendered approach that finds concrete expression in the outcomes of some recent neuroscience research as well as in the ‘gendered innovations in science’ project mentioned in my conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信