{"title":"UiTM正畸患者双颌前突的患病率","authors":"RM Othman, Naa Koay, Shahab Ghani, NH Norman","doi":"10.24191/cos.v6i0.17494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the prevalence of bimaxillary protrusion in general and the prevalence of skeletal Class I and dental Class I bimaxillary protrusion/ proclination among orthodontic patients attending postgraduate orthodontic clinic at Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh, Malaysia. Materials and Methods: This is a cross sectional study which was carried out in two stages. The first part involves a random selection of 100 extra-oral profile photographs taken from postgraduate orthodontic residents’ patient list. The photographs were taken using Canon digital SLR camera EOS 70D with macro lens EF 100mm (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with patients in natural head position. The photographs were visually analysed for its bimaxillary protrusion features by two operators. The second part comprises of analyses of extra-oral profile photographs as well as intra-oral photographs of right buccal segment view which was conducted in two separate sittings. In the first sitting, five assessors analysed 259 extra - and intra-oral photographs followed by 40 photographs assessed in the second sitting for skeletal and dental Class I bimaxillary protrusion/ proclination. Statistical analysis for Kappa score was performed to assess the agreement between assessors using SPSS version 23 and Stata version 13. Results: The first part of the study showed an average prevalence of 34% with bimaxillary protrusion in 100 orthodontic patients. Whilst in the second part, prevalence of skeletal and dental Class I bimax ranging from 28-33 per cent and 38-40 percent respectively with very good and good inter-reliability agreement for both component. Conclusion: The prevalence of bimaxillary protrusion in general among UiTM orthodontic patients was found to range from 31 percent to 37 percent. Whilst the prevalence of skeletal and dental Class I bimax ranging from 28-33 percent and 38-40 percent respectively.","PeriodicalId":10525,"journal":{"name":"Compendium of Oral Science","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Bimaxillary Protrusion among UiTM Orthodontic Patients\",\"authors\":\"RM Othman, Naa Koay, Shahab Ghani, NH Norman\",\"doi\":\"10.24191/cos.v6i0.17494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To determine the prevalence of bimaxillary protrusion in general and the prevalence of skeletal Class I and dental Class I bimaxillary protrusion/ proclination among orthodontic patients attending postgraduate orthodontic clinic at Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh, Malaysia. Materials and Methods: This is a cross sectional study which was carried out in two stages. The first part involves a random selection of 100 extra-oral profile photographs taken from postgraduate orthodontic residents’ patient list. The photographs were taken using Canon digital SLR camera EOS 70D with macro lens EF 100mm (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with patients in natural head position. The photographs were visually analysed for its bimaxillary protrusion features by two operators. The second part comprises of analyses of extra-oral profile photographs as well as intra-oral photographs of right buccal segment view which was conducted in two separate sittings. In the first sitting, five assessors analysed 259 extra - and intra-oral photographs followed by 40 photographs assessed in the second sitting for skeletal and dental Class I bimaxillary protrusion/ proclination. Statistical analysis for Kappa score was performed to assess the agreement between assessors using SPSS version 23 and Stata version 13. Results: The first part of the study showed an average prevalence of 34% with bimaxillary protrusion in 100 orthodontic patients. Whilst in the second part, prevalence of skeletal and dental Class I bimax ranging from 28-33 per cent and 38-40 percent respectively with very good and good inter-reliability agreement for both component. Conclusion: The prevalence of bimaxillary protrusion in general among UiTM orthodontic patients was found to range from 31 percent to 37 percent. Whilst the prevalence of skeletal and dental Class I bimax ranging from 28-33 percent and 38-40 percent respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Compendium of Oral Science\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Compendium of Oral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24191/cos.v6i0.17494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compendium of Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/cos.v6i0.17494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:了解马来西亚Sungai Buloh市玛拉理工大学(UiTM)牙科学院研究生正畸门诊就诊的正畸患者中一般双颌前突的患病率以及骨骼I类和牙齿I类双颌前突/前倾的患病率。材料与方法:本研究为横断面研究,分两个阶段进行。第一部分包括从研究生正畸住院医师患者名单中随机选择100张口腔外侧面照片。照片使用佳能数码单反相机EOS 70D和EF 100mm微距镜头(佳能公司,东京,日本)拍摄,患者处于自然头部位置。两名操作人员对其双颌突出特征进行了视觉分析。第二部分包括分析口腔外侧面照片和口腔内照片的右颊段视图,这是在两个单独的坐姿进行。在第一次会议上,五名评估员分析了259张口腔外和口腔内照片,随后在第二次会议上评估了骨骼和牙齿I类双颌前伸/前倾的40张照片。采用SPSS version 23和Stata version 13对Kappa评分进行统计分析,评估评估者之间的一致性。结果:研究的第一部分显示100例正畸患者中双颌前突的平均患病率为34%。而在第二部分中,骨骼和牙齿I类的患病率分别从28- 33%和38- 40%不等,这两个组件的相互可靠性协议非常好。结论:在UiTM正畸患者中,双颌前突的发生率为31% ~ 37%。而骨骼和牙齿I类患病率最高,分别为28- 33%和38- 40%。
Prevalence of Bimaxillary Protrusion among UiTM Orthodontic Patients
Objective: To determine the prevalence of bimaxillary protrusion in general and the prevalence of skeletal Class I and dental Class I bimaxillary protrusion/ proclination among orthodontic patients attending postgraduate orthodontic clinic at Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Sungai Buloh, Malaysia. Materials and Methods: This is a cross sectional study which was carried out in two stages. The first part involves a random selection of 100 extra-oral profile photographs taken from postgraduate orthodontic residents’ patient list. The photographs were taken using Canon digital SLR camera EOS 70D with macro lens EF 100mm (Canon Inc., Tokyo, Japan) with patients in natural head position. The photographs were visually analysed for its bimaxillary protrusion features by two operators. The second part comprises of analyses of extra-oral profile photographs as well as intra-oral photographs of right buccal segment view which was conducted in two separate sittings. In the first sitting, five assessors analysed 259 extra - and intra-oral photographs followed by 40 photographs assessed in the second sitting for skeletal and dental Class I bimaxillary protrusion/ proclination. Statistical analysis for Kappa score was performed to assess the agreement between assessors using SPSS version 23 and Stata version 13. Results: The first part of the study showed an average prevalence of 34% with bimaxillary protrusion in 100 orthodontic patients. Whilst in the second part, prevalence of skeletal and dental Class I bimax ranging from 28-33 per cent and 38-40 percent respectively with very good and good inter-reliability agreement for both component. Conclusion: The prevalence of bimaxillary protrusion in general among UiTM orthodontic patients was found to range from 31 percent to 37 percent. Whilst the prevalence of skeletal and dental Class I bimax ranging from 28-33 percent and 38-40 percent respectively.