ESC马德里宣言:在尊重人权的情况下促进基于证据的SRHR政策

P. De Sutter
{"title":"ESC马德里宣言:在尊重人权的情况下促进基于证据的SRHR政策","authors":"P. De Sutter","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2019.1662393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite many advancements in the past decades, we are currently being confronted with a threat of regression of SRHR. In several European countries, SRHR-related policies and laws have been made more restrictive. The situation in Poland is particularly worrying, as abortion is severely restricted in the country and the emergency contraception pill is no longer freely available. These restrictive policychanges are influenced by ultra-conservative forces that are actively working against progress in SRHR and advancements in gender equality [1]. They oppose access to contraception and safe and legal abortion, deny the need for comprehensive sexuality and reproductive health education (CSRE) and want to roll-back the rights of LGBTI-people. They want to promote the so-called ‘traditional’ family and do not want to protect the rights of minorities that do not fit in this picture. The ultra-conservative forces Europe have been extremely well-organised in their campaigns to roll back human rights for SRH. The European Parliamentary Forum for sexual and reproductive rights (EPF) launched a report which provides insight into the clandestine workings and deliberate strategy of the anti-choice advocacy network ‘Agenda Europe’, which is driven by religious dogma [2]. Agenda Europe was established in 2013 and holds annual summits attended by over 100 anti-SRHR activists from all over Europe. Being aware and understanding this ultra-conservative movement is essential for those who want to safeguard a modern, inclusive and tolerant Europe. The European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health (ESC) has been increasingly worried about the appearance of these anti-gender views and publicity, and is concerned that this might undermine the organisation’s aim to improve and facilitate knowledge on SRHR. Therefore, the ESC decided to draft a Position Paper on SRHR that was launched in September 2019 in Madrid at the World Contraception Day event organised by the Spanish Society of Contraception. The decision to develop this paper was also triggered by the inspirational and comprehensive report from the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission that was launched in 2018 and proposed a new, comprehensive definition of SRHR, an associated essential package of health services, and outlines several actions needed within and beyond the health sector to uphold human rights [3]. The Madrid Declaration is based on this report but focuses in particular on the European perspective and is therefore relevant for all 53 states within the WHO Europe region. The paper is an important contribution to ongoing discussions in European governments and civil society on a wide range of SRHR-related issues. It highlights in particular the importance of evidence-based decisionmaking and respect for human rights when planning and implementing SRHR policies. Evidence-based medicine and policy-making","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"13 1","pages":"325 - 326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ESC Madrid Declaration: promoting evidence-based SRHR policies with respect for human rights\",\"authors\":\"P. De Sutter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13625187.2019.1662393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite many advancements in the past decades, we are currently being confronted with a threat of regression of SRHR. In several European countries, SRHR-related policies and laws have been made more restrictive. The situation in Poland is particularly worrying, as abortion is severely restricted in the country and the emergency contraception pill is no longer freely available. These restrictive policychanges are influenced by ultra-conservative forces that are actively working against progress in SRHR and advancements in gender equality [1]. They oppose access to contraception and safe and legal abortion, deny the need for comprehensive sexuality and reproductive health education (CSRE) and want to roll-back the rights of LGBTI-people. They want to promote the so-called ‘traditional’ family and do not want to protect the rights of minorities that do not fit in this picture. The ultra-conservative forces Europe have been extremely well-organised in their campaigns to roll back human rights for SRH. The European Parliamentary Forum for sexual and reproductive rights (EPF) launched a report which provides insight into the clandestine workings and deliberate strategy of the anti-choice advocacy network ‘Agenda Europe’, which is driven by religious dogma [2]. Agenda Europe was established in 2013 and holds annual summits attended by over 100 anti-SRHR activists from all over Europe. Being aware and understanding this ultra-conservative movement is essential for those who want to safeguard a modern, inclusive and tolerant Europe. The European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health (ESC) has been increasingly worried about the appearance of these anti-gender views and publicity, and is concerned that this might undermine the organisation’s aim to improve and facilitate knowledge on SRHR. Therefore, the ESC decided to draft a Position Paper on SRHR that was launched in September 2019 in Madrid at the World Contraception Day event organised by the Spanish Society of Contraception. The decision to develop this paper was also triggered by the inspirational and comprehensive report from the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission that was launched in 2018 and proposed a new, comprehensive definition of SRHR, an associated essential package of health services, and outlines several actions needed within and beyond the health sector to uphold human rights [3]. The Madrid Declaration is based on this report but focuses in particular on the European perspective and is therefore relevant for all 53 states within the WHO Europe region. The paper is an important contribution to ongoing discussions in European governments and civil society on a wide range of SRHR-related issues. It highlights in particular the importance of evidence-based decisionmaking and respect for human rights when planning and implementing SRHR policies. Evidence-based medicine and policy-making\",\"PeriodicalId\":22423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"325 - 326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2019.1662393\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2019.1662393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在过去几十年中取得了许多进展,但我们目前正面临着SRHR倒退的威胁。在一些欧洲国家,与性别歧视有关的政策和法律的限制更加严格。波兰的情况尤其令人担忧,因为该国严格限制堕胎,而且不再免费提供紧急避孕药。这些限制性政策变化受到极端保守势力的影响,这些势力积极反对在两性平等方面取得进展。他们反对避孕和安全合法的堕胎,否认全面的性和生殖健康教育(CSRE)的必要性,并希望减少lgbti人群的权利。他们想要促进所谓的“传统”家庭,而不想保护不符合这一图景的少数群体的权利。极端保守的欧洲势力在他们的运动中组织得非常好,以推翻性健康和生殖健康的人权。欧洲议会性权利和生殖权利论坛(EPF)发布了一份报告,该报告深入了解了由宗教教条推动的反选择倡导网络“欧洲议程”的秘密运作和深思熟虑的策略。“欧洲议程”成立于2013年,每年举行一次峰会,来自欧洲各地的100多名反性别歧视活动家参加了峰会。对于那些想要维护一个现代、包容和宽容的欧洲的人来说,意识到并理解这种极端保守的运动是必不可少的。欧洲避孕和生殖健康协会(ESC)越来越担心这些反性别观点和宣传的出现,并担心这可能会破坏该组织改善和促进关于性别与生殖健康的知识的目标。因此,ESC决定起草一份关于SRHR的立场文件,该文件于2019年9月在马德里由西班牙避孕协会组织的世界避孕日活动上发布。古特马赫-柳叶刀委员会(Guttmacher-Lancet Commission)于2018年发布了一份鼓舞人心的全面报告,该报告提出了性健康和生殖健康权利的全新全面定义,即相关的一揽子基本卫生服务,并概述了卫生部门内外为维护人权所需采取的若干行动。《马德里宣言》以该报告为基础,但特别侧重于欧洲视角,因此与世卫组织欧洲区域内的所有53个国家相关。这篇论文对欧洲各国政府和民间社会正在进行的有关性别性别问题的广泛讨论作出了重要贡献。它特别强调了在规划和执行性健康和生殖健康政策时基于证据的决策和尊重人权的重要性。循证医学与政策制定
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ESC Madrid Declaration: promoting evidence-based SRHR policies with respect for human rights
Despite many advancements in the past decades, we are currently being confronted with a threat of regression of SRHR. In several European countries, SRHR-related policies and laws have been made more restrictive. The situation in Poland is particularly worrying, as abortion is severely restricted in the country and the emergency contraception pill is no longer freely available. These restrictive policychanges are influenced by ultra-conservative forces that are actively working against progress in SRHR and advancements in gender equality [1]. They oppose access to contraception and safe and legal abortion, deny the need for comprehensive sexuality and reproductive health education (CSRE) and want to roll-back the rights of LGBTI-people. They want to promote the so-called ‘traditional’ family and do not want to protect the rights of minorities that do not fit in this picture. The ultra-conservative forces Europe have been extremely well-organised in their campaigns to roll back human rights for SRH. The European Parliamentary Forum for sexual and reproductive rights (EPF) launched a report which provides insight into the clandestine workings and deliberate strategy of the anti-choice advocacy network ‘Agenda Europe’, which is driven by religious dogma [2]. Agenda Europe was established in 2013 and holds annual summits attended by over 100 anti-SRHR activists from all over Europe. Being aware and understanding this ultra-conservative movement is essential for those who want to safeguard a modern, inclusive and tolerant Europe. The European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health (ESC) has been increasingly worried about the appearance of these anti-gender views and publicity, and is concerned that this might undermine the organisation’s aim to improve and facilitate knowledge on SRHR. Therefore, the ESC decided to draft a Position Paper on SRHR that was launched in September 2019 in Madrid at the World Contraception Day event organised by the Spanish Society of Contraception. The decision to develop this paper was also triggered by the inspirational and comprehensive report from the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission that was launched in 2018 and proposed a new, comprehensive definition of SRHR, an associated essential package of health services, and outlines several actions needed within and beyond the health sector to uphold human rights [3]. The Madrid Declaration is based on this report but focuses in particular on the European perspective and is therefore relevant for all 53 states within the WHO Europe region. The paper is an important contribution to ongoing discussions in European governments and civil society on a wide range of SRHR-related issues. It highlights in particular the importance of evidence-based decisionmaking and respect for human rights when planning and implementing SRHR policies. Evidence-based medicine and policy-making
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信