住工艺

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Zachary Tavlin
{"title":"住工艺","authors":"Zachary Tavlin","doi":"10.1353/jnc.2021.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:As contemporary literary scholars continue to debate the use-value of \"lived experience\" and testimonial evidence for the discipline—one arm of a larger debate over the ideologies of critique and postcritique—they often overlook the relevance of sites of literary making, or techne, where such distinctions are mediated. This essay argues that scholars need not choose between lived experience and critical distance ahead of their readings. By understanding how literary work depends upon techne and technologies, and how literary archives embody and inscribe transindividual craftwork and knowledge, we can better locate authorial and cultural causes of the texts we read without reducing either in the process.","PeriodicalId":41876,"journal":{"name":"J19-The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists","volume":"13 1","pages":"91 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lived Craftwork\",\"authors\":\"Zachary Tavlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jnc.2021.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:As contemporary literary scholars continue to debate the use-value of \\\"lived experience\\\" and testimonial evidence for the discipline—one arm of a larger debate over the ideologies of critique and postcritique—they often overlook the relevance of sites of literary making, or techne, where such distinctions are mediated. This essay argues that scholars need not choose between lived experience and critical distance ahead of their readings. By understanding how literary work depends upon techne and technologies, and how literary archives embody and inscribe transindividual craftwork and knowledge, we can better locate authorial and cultural causes of the texts we read without reducing either in the process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J19-The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"91 - 96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J19-The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jnc.2021.0010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J19-The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jnc.2021.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:随着当代文学学者继续争论“生活经验”的使用价值和该学科的见证证据(关于批评和后批评意识形态的更大争论的一部分),他们往往忽视了文学创作场所或技术的相关性,这些区别是中介的。这篇文章认为,学者们不需要在阅读之前在生活经验和临界距离之间做出选择。通过了解文学作品如何依赖于技术和技术,以及文学档案如何体现和记录跨个体的工艺和知识,我们可以更好地定位我们所阅读文本的作者和文化原因,而不会在此过程中减少其中任何一个。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lived Craftwork
Abstract:As contemporary literary scholars continue to debate the use-value of "lived experience" and testimonial evidence for the discipline—one arm of a larger debate over the ideologies of critique and postcritique—they often overlook the relevance of sites of literary making, or techne, where such distinctions are mediated. This essay argues that scholars need not choose between lived experience and critical distance ahead of their readings. By understanding how literary work depends upon techne and technologies, and how literary archives embody and inscribe transindividual craftwork and knowledge, we can better locate authorial and cultural causes of the texts we read without reducing either in the process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信