{"title":"惊吓试验(后坐力)与非应激试验的前瞻性比较。","authors":"H. Gabert, Joseph M. Miller","doi":"10.1080/714052738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : Our purpose was to compare fetal heart rate reaction to external physical stimulation with the non-stress test (NST). Methods : This was a prospective study evaluating documentation of fetal heart accelerations by two methods. The standard NST was performed prior to the ultrasound evaluation. The NST results were not available to the ultrasonographer. M-mode ultrasound was used to establish a stable fetal heart rate. The ultrasound transducer was used to stimulate fetal movement by indentations of the uterus over the fetal small parts. A second fetal heart rate was determined within 15 s after stimulation. Results : A total of 122 patients had 159 studies performed. The fetal heart rate range due to fetal startle (recoil) was m 22 to 14 (median of 3) in the 45 fetuses with non-reactive NSTs and 1 to 38 (median of 15) in the 114 fetuses with a reactive NST ( p < 0.001). A receiver operating curve comparing the fetal response to the startle and the NST revealed an area under the curve of 0.9...","PeriodicalId":79464,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","volume":"1995 1","pages":"159-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective comparison of the startle test (recoil) and non-stress test.\",\"authors\":\"H. Gabert, Joseph M. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/714052738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective : Our purpose was to compare fetal heart rate reaction to external physical stimulation with the non-stress test (NST). Methods : This was a prospective study evaluating documentation of fetal heart accelerations by two methods. The standard NST was performed prior to the ultrasound evaluation. The NST results were not available to the ultrasonographer. M-mode ultrasound was used to establish a stable fetal heart rate. The ultrasound transducer was used to stimulate fetal movement by indentations of the uterus over the fetal small parts. A second fetal heart rate was determined within 15 s after stimulation. Results : A total of 122 patients had 159 studies performed. The fetal heart rate range due to fetal startle (recoil) was m 22 to 14 (median of 3) in the 45 fetuses with non-reactive NSTs and 1 to 38 (median of 15) in the 114 fetuses with a reactive NST ( p < 0.001). A receiver operating curve comparing the fetal response to the startle and the NST revealed an area under the curve of 0.9...\",\"PeriodicalId\":79464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine\",\"volume\":\"1995 1\",\"pages\":\"159-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/714052738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/714052738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prospective comparison of the startle test (recoil) and non-stress test.
Objective : Our purpose was to compare fetal heart rate reaction to external physical stimulation with the non-stress test (NST). Methods : This was a prospective study evaluating documentation of fetal heart accelerations by two methods. The standard NST was performed prior to the ultrasound evaluation. The NST results were not available to the ultrasonographer. M-mode ultrasound was used to establish a stable fetal heart rate. The ultrasound transducer was used to stimulate fetal movement by indentations of the uterus over the fetal small parts. A second fetal heart rate was determined within 15 s after stimulation. Results : A total of 122 patients had 159 studies performed. The fetal heart rate range due to fetal startle (recoil) was m 22 to 14 (median of 3) in the 45 fetuses with non-reactive NSTs and 1 to 38 (median of 15) in the 114 fetuses with a reactive NST ( p < 0.001). A receiver operating curve comparing the fetal response to the startle and the NST revealed an area under the curve of 0.9...