惊吓试验(后坐力)与非应激试验的前瞻性比较。

H. Gabert, Joseph M. Miller
{"title":"惊吓试验(后坐力)与非应激试验的前瞻性比较。","authors":"H. Gabert, Joseph M. Miller","doi":"10.1080/714052738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : Our purpose was to compare fetal heart rate reaction to external physical stimulation with the non-stress test (NST). Methods : This was a prospective study evaluating documentation of fetal heart accelerations by two methods. The standard NST was performed prior to the ultrasound evaluation. The NST results were not available to the ultrasonographer. M-mode ultrasound was used to establish a stable fetal heart rate. The ultrasound transducer was used to stimulate fetal movement by indentations of the uterus over the fetal small parts. A second fetal heart rate was determined within 15 s after stimulation. Results : A total of 122 patients had 159 studies performed. The fetal heart rate range due to fetal startle (recoil) was m 22 to 14 (median of 3) in the 45 fetuses with non-reactive NSTs and 1 to 38 (median of 15) in the 114 fetuses with a reactive NST ( p < 0.001). A receiver operating curve comparing the fetal response to the startle and the NST revealed an area under the curve of 0.9...","PeriodicalId":79464,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","volume":"1995 1","pages":"159-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective comparison of the startle test (recoil) and non-stress test.\",\"authors\":\"H. Gabert, Joseph M. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/714052738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective : Our purpose was to compare fetal heart rate reaction to external physical stimulation with the non-stress test (NST). Methods : This was a prospective study evaluating documentation of fetal heart accelerations by two methods. The standard NST was performed prior to the ultrasound evaluation. The NST results were not available to the ultrasonographer. M-mode ultrasound was used to establish a stable fetal heart rate. The ultrasound transducer was used to stimulate fetal movement by indentations of the uterus over the fetal small parts. A second fetal heart rate was determined within 15 s after stimulation. Results : A total of 122 patients had 159 studies performed. The fetal heart rate range due to fetal startle (recoil) was m 22 to 14 (median of 3) in the 45 fetuses with non-reactive NSTs and 1 to 38 (median of 15) in the 114 fetuses with a reactive NST ( p < 0.001). A receiver operating curve comparing the fetal response to the startle and the NST revealed an area under the curve of 0.9...\",\"PeriodicalId\":79464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine\",\"volume\":\"1995 1\",\"pages\":\"159-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/714052738\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/714052738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较体外物理刺激与非应激试验(NST)对胎儿心率的影响。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,通过两种方法评估胎儿心脏加速的记录。在超声评估之前进行标准的NST检查。超声医师无法获得NST结果。采用m型超声确定胎儿心率稳定。超声换能器通过子宫在胎儿小部位上的压痕来刺激胎儿运动。在刺激后15 s内测定第二次胎儿心率。结果:122例患者共进行了159项研究。45例非反应性NST胎儿因惊吓(后坐力)引起的胎儿心率范围为m 22 ~ 14(中位数为3),114例反应性NST胎儿因惊吓(后坐力)引起的胎儿心率范围为1 ~ 38(中位数为15)(p < 0.001)。对比胎儿对惊吓和NST反应的接受者操作曲线显示,曲线下的面积为0.9……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective comparison of the startle test (recoil) and non-stress test.
Objective : Our purpose was to compare fetal heart rate reaction to external physical stimulation with the non-stress test (NST). Methods : This was a prospective study evaluating documentation of fetal heart accelerations by two methods. The standard NST was performed prior to the ultrasound evaluation. The NST results were not available to the ultrasonographer. M-mode ultrasound was used to establish a stable fetal heart rate. The ultrasound transducer was used to stimulate fetal movement by indentations of the uterus over the fetal small parts. A second fetal heart rate was determined within 15 s after stimulation. Results : A total of 122 patients had 159 studies performed. The fetal heart rate range due to fetal startle (recoil) was m 22 to 14 (median of 3) in the 45 fetuses with non-reactive NSTs and 1 to 38 (median of 15) in the 114 fetuses with a reactive NST ( p < 0.001). A receiver operating curve comparing the fetal response to the startle and the NST revealed an area under the curve of 0.9...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信