S. K. Landersoe, K. Petersen, D. Vassard, E. Larsen, H. S. Nielsen, A. Pinborg, B. Nøhr, A. Nyboe Andersen, L. Schmidt
{"title":"对复方口服避孕药使用者和过去使用者未来生育能力的关切:一项问卷调查","authors":"S. K. Landersoe, K. Petersen, D. Vassard, E. Larsen, H. S. Nielsen, A. Pinborg, B. Nøhr, A. Nyboe Andersen, L. Schmidt","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2019.1639659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: The combined oral contraceptive pill is the most preferred contraceptive method worldwide. Despite high life-time prevalence of infertility of 16–26%, scarce data about concerns of future fertility among COC users are available. We aimed to study whether COC usage induces concerns about fertility. Methods: Online questionnaire-based survey included 1283 current COC users and 1006 past users. The questionnaire covered knowledge and concerns of various aspects of fertility with respect to COC usage. Results: Significantly, more current users (66%) than past users (52%) had considered whether or not COC usage could affect future fertility (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.3–1.9). Nearly 50% of both groups believed COC usage could impair conception rates after discontinuation. Furthermore, 28% current vs. 19% past users believed COC could diminish the ovarian reserve more permanently. Conversely, 14% current and 11% past users believed that lack of ovulation could ‘spare’ the eggs (OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.7–1.3). Significantly fewer current users (22%) vs. past users (35%) had heard, primarily by female friends, that a short break of 1–2 months during long-term COC usage was healthy, (OR 0.72, 95%CI = 0.56–0.92). Conclusions: Health care professionals prescribing hormonal contraception should be aware of misapprehensions and concerns of fertility among users of COC.","PeriodicalId":22423,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","volume":"14 1","pages":"347 - 355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concerns on future fertility among users and past-users of combined oral contraceptives: a questionnaire survey\",\"authors\":\"S. K. Landersoe, K. Petersen, D. Vassard, E. Larsen, H. S. Nielsen, A. Pinborg, B. Nøhr, A. Nyboe Andersen, L. Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13625187.2019.1639659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective: The combined oral contraceptive pill is the most preferred contraceptive method worldwide. Despite high life-time prevalence of infertility of 16–26%, scarce data about concerns of future fertility among COC users are available. We aimed to study whether COC usage induces concerns about fertility. Methods: Online questionnaire-based survey included 1283 current COC users and 1006 past users. The questionnaire covered knowledge and concerns of various aspects of fertility with respect to COC usage. Results: Significantly, more current users (66%) than past users (52%) had considered whether or not COC usage could affect future fertility (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.3–1.9). Nearly 50% of both groups believed COC usage could impair conception rates after discontinuation. Furthermore, 28% current vs. 19% past users believed COC could diminish the ovarian reserve more permanently. Conversely, 14% current and 11% past users believed that lack of ovulation could ‘spare’ the eggs (OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.7–1.3). Significantly fewer current users (22%) vs. past users (35%) had heard, primarily by female friends, that a short break of 1–2 months during long-term COC usage was healthy, (OR 0.72, 95%CI = 0.56–0.92). Conclusions: Health care professionals prescribing hormonal contraception should be aware of misapprehensions and concerns of fertility among users of COC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"347 - 355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2019.1639659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2019.1639659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
摘要目的:复方口服避孕药是目前世界范围内最常用的避孕方法。尽管不孕不育的终生患病率高达16-26%,但很少有关于COC使用者未来生育问题的数据。我们的目的是研究COC的使用是否会引起对生育的担忧。方法:采用在线问卷调查的方式,对1283名COC当前用户和1006名COC过去用户进行调查。调查表涵盖了有关COC使用的生育各方面的知识和关注。结果:值得注意的是,当前用户(66%)比过去用户(52%)更多地考虑过COC的使用是否会影响未来的生育能力(or = 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-1.9)。两组都有近50%的人认为服用COC会影响停药后的受孕率。此外,28%的当前用户和19%的过去用户认为COC可以更永久地减少卵巢储备。相反,14%的当前用户和11%的过去用户认为缺乏排卵可以“节省”卵子(OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.3)。当前用户(22%)与过去用户(35%)相比,更少的人(主要是女性朋友)听说,在长期使用COC期间短暂休息1-2个月是健康的(OR 0.72, 95%CI = 0.56-0.92)。结论:开具激素避孕处方的卫生保健专业人员应了解COC使用者对生育的误解和担忧。
Concerns on future fertility among users and past-users of combined oral contraceptives: a questionnaire survey
Abstract Objective: The combined oral contraceptive pill is the most preferred contraceptive method worldwide. Despite high life-time prevalence of infertility of 16–26%, scarce data about concerns of future fertility among COC users are available. We aimed to study whether COC usage induces concerns about fertility. Methods: Online questionnaire-based survey included 1283 current COC users and 1006 past users. The questionnaire covered knowledge and concerns of various aspects of fertility with respect to COC usage. Results: Significantly, more current users (66%) than past users (52%) had considered whether or not COC usage could affect future fertility (OR = 1.6, 95% CI 1.3–1.9). Nearly 50% of both groups believed COC usage could impair conception rates after discontinuation. Furthermore, 28% current vs. 19% past users believed COC could diminish the ovarian reserve more permanently. Conversely, 14% current and 11% past users believed that lack of ovulation could ‘spare’ the eggs (OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.7–1.3). Significantly fewer current users (22%) vs. past users (35%) had heard, primarily by female friends, that a short break of 1–2 months during long-term COC usage was healthy, (OR 0.72, 95%CI = 0.56–0.92). Conclusions: Health care professionals prescribing hormonal contraception should be aware of misapprehensions and concerns of fertility among users of COC.